Dave Brooks

32.8K posts

Dave Brooks banner
Dave Brooks

Dave Brooks

@PensionsDave

Head of Policy at Broadstone. Basically-a talkative technical pensions geek prone to whimsy & typos. Also a pensions stalwart don't you know...

The Wirral Katılım Temmuz 2012
3.2K Takip Edilen2.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dave Brooks
Dave Brooks@PensionsDave·
Before I was pensions dave I was in a band. Best days ever (sorry pensions world). Here’s our band camp page if you would ever like to have a nose (ear... you know what I mean). bookharrison.bandcamp.com
English
8
2
33
0
Charlie
Charlie@pensionscanwork·
@PensionsDave You've ruined the twist Dave. We should get a picture before we go.
English
1
0
1
18
David Robbins
David Robbins@David_J_Robbins·
He was less full and frank than he could have been about HMG's intentions re: amendments. They certainly can just reinsert the text the Lords removes, as long as they don't mind a short delay to Royal Assent. But why give the impression last week that the BIll would be amended (without quite saying so)?
English
1
0
0
38
David Robbins
David Robbins@David_J_Robbins·
Still no Government amendment limiting the reserve power it is asking Parliament for re: mandating asset allocation in default funds of defined contribution pension schemes. So it's either a last-minute amendment or no amendment at all. The latter would not prevent the Government from making a concession when the Bill returns to the Commons - the Lords may remove the provision altogether and MPs could reinsert either the original text or a watered down version. Prior to the minister's comments last week, I would have guessed that the plan was to make a concession during ping pong. But I'm not sure what has changed since the @PensionsUK_ conference. Have expectations changes re: Opposition peers inflicting a defeat even if the powers are more tightly defined? Is an amendment proving hard to draft? Or, noting that the minister never used the word "amendment", was an amendment not planned to begin with (despite the statement that "the power will only be able to be used exactly for implementing the Accord")?
David Robbins@David_J_Robbins

This morning, @TorstenBell twice sidestepped questions from @PeterABedford about the process for clarifying the mandation power (amendment vs just ministerial comments). 1st answer: "I’ve been very clear... that the only purpose of the reserve power is to make sure that the Mansion House Accord, proposed by the industry itself, actually operates, and that’s what we’re going to do.” 2nd answer: “It’s for the Lords to take forward their policy, but what I’ve always said to you...” [I think he said "take forward their policy" - audio was unclear.]

English
1
1
1
1K
Dave Brooks
Dave Brooks@PensionsDave·
@dontdelay Oddly he's passing on the car and maybe the keys to the mansion in the back ground while he's alive. Unless he's there in ghost form. Anyway, top work from the AI artist there.
English
0
0
1
32
Dave Brooks
Dave Brooks@PensionsDave·
The demographic challenges is starting to hit home. Tough decisions needed as baby boomers reach retirement and beyond. A problem for the next 100 years. Fear the current generation of legislators will kick it and not think about it seriously as the answers are hard.
Zoe Gardner@ZoeJardiniere

Reform & the far right would rather you work into your old age than we allow brown people to come to the country & work to allow us to keep paying pensions. Old, white, worked to death, & poor is how they want us.

English
7
2
9
3.9K
Dave Brooks retweetledi
Colin the Dachshund
Colin the Dachshund@DachshundColin·
"I should add that according to friends he did dodge £600k in tax but say it was a one off. Our next question is from Barry." Barry: "Is it acceptable that a Green MP disgracefully wore a pink blouse with lime green trousers in parliament?"
Colin the Dachshund tweet media
Times Politics@timespolitics

Reform’s Richard Tice avoided nearly £600,000 in tax #Echobox=1773522666" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

English
29
1K
8.5K
172.6K
John Stepek
John Stepek@John_Stepek·
@PensionsDave @Sjg3G @TorstenBell Problem is a) the asset class prescription, I don't think unlisted is sensible or even where the problem is; and b) clause 40 as it stands
English
1
0
1
54
John Stepek
John Stepek@John_Stepek·
This is disingenuous. Restricting tax relief to UK-listed assets was a key element of PEP (ISA precursor) when they launched and also part of many nations' pension regimes. Very different to what's proposed (currently - presumably will be tweaked) in the pensions bill.
Torsten Bell@TorstenBell

This is hilarious. Whose is the peer who has most persistently lobbied me and other ministers to “dictate your pension investments” (by withdrawing tax relief if you don’t invest as she would like)? Ros Altmann. And I told her we weren’t interested

English
17
18
152
35.9K
Dave Brooks
Dave Brooks@PensionsDave·
@Sjg3G @John_Stepek @TorstenBell The issue now becomes the VFM rules. If we don’t have mandation some providers follow mansion house and some don’t. They all then get judged on performance and say the ones not using UK productive finance perform better that looks bad. It has become all or nothing.
English
0
0
2
25
Dave Brooks
Dave Brooks@PensionsDave·
@Sjg3G @John_Stepek @TorstenBell Isn’t making the default fund a minimum uk percentage exactly what they are proposing? Albeit of a particular asset class. People can and won’t opt out is right so it becomes the default asset class.
English
2
0
0
41
Dave Brooks
Dave Brooks@PensionsDave·
Meant to add I’m in the odd position of disagreeing with Ros and Torsten. Intrigued by any proposed amendment.
English
1
0
0
45
Dave Brooks
Dave Brooks@PensionsDave·
So we have mandation vs “incentives” as a technical distinction because economically they'll do as similar thing. However, tax relief is meant to reward saving, not steer asset allocation. It shouldn’t be doing both
English
1
0
2
111
Dave Brooks
Dave Brooks@PensionsDave·
This is an interesting point as Ros argued for tax relief as a condition based on UK investment. She is opposing blanket legal compulsion of a fixed allocation. No to “you must invest X% in the UK by law”. Yes to “you receive tax relief only if you invest X% in the UK”
Torsten Bell@TorstenBell

This is hilarious. Whose is the peer who has most persistently lobbied me and other ministers to “dictate your pension investments” (by withdrawing tax relief if you don’t invest as she would like)? Ros Altmann. And I told her we weren’t interested

English
1
1
1
317
Dave Brooks retweetledi
Rothmus 🏴
Rothmus 🏴@Rothmus·
ZXX
631
1.3K
18.6K
791.5K
Dave Brooks retweetledi
Cory Booker
Cory Booker@CoryBooker·
Here’s a reminder that civility, decency, and humility are not weaknesses in a democracy, they are strengths. You can fight hard without being cruel. You can stand your ground and still find common ground. You don’t have to tear people down in order to lift others up. Decency is not naïveté. Civility is not surrender. They are strengths and often the surest strategy for lasting success, for individuals and for our nation. In a time when our president traffics in cruelty masquerading as strength, shameless hubris, and the weakness of meanness, our nation needs leaders who show something better: the value of vulnerability, the strength of virtue, and the courage to affirm the dignity of even your opponent—even when they refuse to affirm yours.
English
202
1K
6.6K
141.5K