ravioli

@jaehyungantenk ahhhh klo kmu mksdnya clingy in an ok way I get it tapi kmu kan bilang itu geli jadi aku kirain kmu ngejekin dia gtuu

@PeopleLover5 Clingy is not bad tho ??? 😭 emang aku bilang gt???? Aku kan bilang dia cling better than my ex dan kita manggil itu papa mama lho lao po lao gong is suami-istri makanya kayak bocah SD and probably menggelikan buat orang-orang lain… Sebenernya problemnya apaaaaaaaa???

Ketemu di bumble, orang chinese yang kerja 3 tahun di Indo Lancar bgt ngomong indo Cling better than any of my ex 😭 mana manggilnya lao po lao gong kayak bocah SD babi, yang chinese asli pasti jijik bacanya 😭

@jaehyungantenk well I'm just saying, this situation imo is not that out of the norm, i wouldn't call it clingy

@PeopleLover5 Itu kamu bertanya atau sarkas atau gimana karena ada tanda “?” Ya normal normal aja, ini bukan pacarku, cuman match bumble dan ya jokes aja sih manggil gitu, jangan serius-serius pls

@jaehyungantenk oke gw gk tau apa elu maksud dengan clingy, tapi behaviour ini after a few weeks of talking is normal for some ppl, if you're not comfortable communicate gak sih?

@PeopleLover5 Gak normal kak

@vngnc blok m is literally the normie hangout spot

normies should be forbidden from entering 1 mile radius around blok m

@BorterPawtrol @JulienHKK @TheOmniZaddy @antoniogm Also ramadans over, it was just eid

@BorterPawtrol @JulienHKK @TheOmniZaddy @antoniogm It's more about being appreciative after ramadan

Living in NYC is so great. Where else can you get iced coffee?

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz .... yh I'm not even gonna comment ngl

@PeopleLover5 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz That was a aside, with a disclaimer stating it wasn't my burden in the first place, but that I had just found the history that proves he is "the dark money guy"

. @TaylorLorenz is too slow to understand that a LLC is dark money by another name but that’s understandable considering she calls herself a “renowned journalist” when she’s been fired from every serious major publication for being unserious

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz ok now connect, how was the claim you made (of 1630 being funded by the llc) refuting her claim? that she knows where her money comes from? (solely the llc funded by the omidyars)

@PeopleLover5 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz Taylor makes claim: 1630 is dark money, dark money is bad because we dont know where it comes from. Destiny: You don't know where your income comes from. How is it different? Taylor: Well, the dark money guy says it isn't dark money. That's where we are right now.

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz you're not refuting her claim. Did she ever make the claim that the LLC doesn't fund dark money orgs? or any claim like that?

@PeopleLover5 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz no, you're doing circular logic, because you forgot I'm not making a claim. I'm refuting her claim

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz I mean you have a right to have your suspicions, it's just not the same situation

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz LMFAOOO yes I understand and I say that logic doesn't follow

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz did you misread the article you cited?

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz you didn't prove that... you proved that the llc funds other dark money orgs. Not that it's receiving dark money itself.

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz A --> B does not imply B-->A this relationship doesn't follow the symmetric property.

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz your logic doesn't connect... do you think this provides as proof or even a reasonable indicator of it being funded by anyone other than omidyars? I don't think her criticism of 1630 wasn't in regards to the entities they fund, more I'm which their funders aren't disclosed.

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz which is known to be a dark money group

@firstfir217469 @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz they don't publish it because they're not required to... but I mean fair point, but still regardless you understand this is not the same both as 1630 fund right? you have an llc that is publicly known to be solely funded by omidyars who doesn't have any controversy vs 1630...

@firstfir217469 @mrtelevoid @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz also literally this

@firstfir217469 @mrtelevoid @grok @Medi4M4inStre4m @ZeeToTheHill @TaylorLorenz The point is you're fighting ghosts. 1630 and omidyar's situation is not at all comparable and the reasons why people sus 1630 doesn't apply to Omidyar.