Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State

47 posts

Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State banner
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State

Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State

@PetersenForNE

Candidate for Nebraska Secretary of State America/Nebraska First Conservative 🇺🇸 Restore Confidence • Secure Elections • Defend Nebraska

The Cornhusker State Katılım Şubat 2026
167 Takip Edilen54 Takipçiler
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State
Washington is finally talking about election integrity. Nebraska already acted. In 2023, we pushed legislation (LB 193/228/230/457) to strengthen paper ballots, security measures, and transparency and I was part of the team that drafted it. We don’t need to follow. Nebraska needs to lead. whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
English
1
0
3
24
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State
Hamilton County didn’t wait. They led. First to push for hand-counted ballots, now backing our campaign. Appreciate the support from the Hamilton County Republican Party. Let’s keep it going. #NebraskaFirst 🇺🇸
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State tweet media
English
1
3
13
951
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State retweetledi
Mike Lindell Offense Fund
Mike Lindell Offense Fund@MLindellOffense·
50–60 MILLION voter records reviewed. Thousands of ineligible, outdated registrations — including non‑citizens. Some of them VOTED. 🚨🗳️ This is what happens when you gut voter ID and let filthy voter rolls sit for years. Anyone still saying “there’s no problem” is lying or not looking. 🔥
English
3
18
32
266
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State
Got this last night. Handmade. Thoughtful. Awesome. Reminds you what really matters. Thanks for this awesome artwork, Reagan (coolest name ever 😄). Let’s build a Nebraska the next generation can be proud of. 🇺🇸 #NebraskaFirst
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State tweet media
English
0
0
3
38
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State
Bob Evnen’s office entered into an agreement for “Albert Monitoring” of election systems. That agreement REQUIRED counties to provide: • network diagrams • IP ranges (even unused “dark space”) • system configurations • full contact lists of election personnel This isn’t speculation—it’s in the contract. Counties had to provide direct internet access for: • device management • outbound data transmission So the question is simple: 👉 What data is leaving Nebraska’s election systems?
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State tweet mediaScott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State tweet mediaScott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State tweet media
Peter Bernegger@PeterBernegger

🚨Tweet #52 - Is your city or county on the list? Below are details what of cities and counties gave up when they accepted Albert Sensors and CrowdStrike. The Albert Sensor County Memorandum of Agreement, Section C, required every participating county to provide CIS prior to installation - and any time the information changed: ✦ Item 1: Current network diagrams for all portions of the network being monitored ✦ Item 2: In-band remote access via secure internet channel to manage the device ✦ Item 3: Outbound log transmission access via secure internet channel ✦ Item 4: Reasonable assistance to CIS to enable CSS delivery ✦ Item 5: Maintenance of all required hardware, virtual machines, or software - and enabling CIS access to same ✦ Item 6: Public AND Private IP address ranges - including server type, operating system, and configuration - plus all IP ranges and addresses not in use (DarkNet space) ✦ Item 7: Completed Pre-Installation Questionnaires (PIQs) - revised whenever anything changed ✦ Item 8: Accurate and up-to-date name, email, landline, mobile, and pager numbers for all designated authorized Points of Contact with portal access ✦ Item 9: Name, email address, landline, mobile, and pager numbers for all shipping, installation, and security points of contact -Every election official. -Every IT contact. -Every security point of contact. -Name. -Email. -Mobile number. -Pager number. All of it - handed to CIS/CISA as a contractual requirement just to receive a "free" security sensor. This is not just a network map. This is a complete personnel directory of every person with access to county election infrastructure. Now look at who signed up, sample screenshots below. The whole list here for you to look up your jurisdiction: CIS published the full EI-ISAC partner list publicly - but it has been scrubbed! But @GuySmith1713057 found it. The only place it survives is the Wayback Machine, archived January 22, 2022: web.archive.org/web/2022012221… Screenshots of the archived list follow, is your city or county on it? Hmmmm, I see Bexar County Texas. Thousands of cities and counties - all 50 states - contractually surrendered their -network topology, -their IP ranges including dark space, -their server configurations, -and the personal contact details of every election security official they employed. Why was the list scrubbed? ➡️➡️ Ban computers from our elections.

English
6
0
0
61
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State
Nebraskans were told our systems are secure and controlled. But: • Who has access to this data? • What entities outside Nebraska can see it? • Can counties opt out today? These are basic questions—and we deserve answers.
English
0
0
0
19
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State
And here’s what should concern every Nebraskan: The agreement states the service is provided “as-is” —with no liability for accuracy or performance. So: No accountability. But full access.
English
0
0
0
13
Scott Petersen for Nebraska Secretary of State
It doesn’t stop there. Evnen’s own office celebrated placing this monitoring system inside a private election vendor environment. Let that sink in. Monitoring wasn’t just at the county level—it extended into vendor systems.
English
0
0
0
15