Phil Nguyen

7K posts

Phil Nguyen

Phil Nguyen

@PhilNguyen69

Seattle, WA Katılım Ağustos 2019
473 Takip Edilen746 Takipçiler
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@PhilNguyen69·
@InTheAssembly They have plenty of fund to DCA and always come out profitable long term.
English
1
0
0
39
The Assembly
The Assembly@InTheAssembly·
Cathie Wood did it again. She bought $32.8M of $CBRS at $310, one day after the IPO closed at $311. The stock now trades at $207. Down 33% in 3 weeks. ARKK is still one of the worst performing funds in the entire market.
The Assembly tweet media
The Assembly@InTheAssembly

Cathie Wood might be the most expensive lesson retail investors have ever paid for. Her flagship ARK Innovation ETF is down 23% in the last 5 years. The S&P 500 is up 77% over the same period. She has underperformed the index by 100 percentage points. And she has done it while collecting BILLIONS in management fees. A quick reminder of the highlight reel: – She predicted Tesla would hit $3,000 per share by 2025. It is currently $432. – She predicted Tesla revenue would hit $234 to $367 billion in 2025. The actual number came in under $100 billion. – She made Teladoc her single largest position around $80 per share. It trades at $7 today. – She loaded up on Zoom near $300. It trades at $110. – She dumped almost her entire Nvidia position in January 2023 around $20 per share. Nvidia is now at $220, which means she sold the single greatest stock of this generation right before it 10x’d. Morningstar officially labeled the ARK family of funds a “value destroyer,” noting that her funds lost roughly $14 billion in shareholder value from 2014 to 2024. But here’s the part nobody talks about: ARK Investment Management has been one of the most profitable asset managers of the last decade. Wood has personally made tens of millions in fees while her investors have collectively lost real money. This is the part of Wall Street most retail investors do not understand. You’re not paying for performance, you’re paying for marketing. The people who win are the ones running the fund, not the ones holding it. This Friday, May 15, every fund managing over $100 million is legally required to disclose their Q1 2026 trades to the SEC. We will be breaking down EVERY major filing right here the moment they drop. Follow us with notifications before it’s too late. If you don’t follow us, you might regret it.

English
494
388
4.3K
1.5M
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@PhilNguyen69·
@CKCapitalxx They make great products, but they still depend on others to deploy them before those products can deliver any real value.
English
1
0
2
788
CK Capital
CK Capital@CKCapitalxx·
At what price does $ASTS become attractive again? Blue Origin was a big hit in the gut but thesis is still in tact.
English
139
92
442
49.8K
Phil Nguyen retweetledi
TheSonOfWalkley
TheSonOfWalkley@TheSonOfWalkley·
PEOPLE SELLING $TSLA FOR SPACEX ????
TheSonOfWalkley tweet media
English
100
12
328
24.5K
gravis
gravis@gravis821·
@AccessIPOs They should just let retail take it all
English
2
0
2
867
Craig Stephens | Access IPOs
Brokers are going to lose customers over SpaceX allocations. Gonna get nasty June 12th.
English
9
3
107
19.1K
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@PhilNguyen69·
@blackouttrades @TeslaBoomerMama If SpaceX merged with Tesla: The combined company would likely stay in the S&P 500 (replacing TSLA's spot). It wouldn't kick TSLA out and add SpaceX separately — the survivor just continues as the member with updated size/weight.
English
1
0
1
33
Blackout Trades
Blackout Trades@blackouttrades·
@TeslaBoomerMama Oddly, this is actually very positive news towards a potential merger. While it’s not technically a sure thing even with the merger (would need approval for official inclusion), there is just no way th new entity would be immediately included into the S&P.
English
2
1
1
182
Phil Nguyen retweetledi
AleXandra Merz 🇺🇲
AleXandra Merz 🇺🇲@TeslaBoomerMama·
Quick update on today’s S&P announcement. S&P did not create a fast-track for MegaCaps into the S&P 500. However, they did make some changes to the broader total market indices — and one important pathway for earlier S&P 500 inclusion remains open. I explain it all in this short video + the article below. Watch here 👇
AleXandra Merz 🇺🇲@TeslaBoomerMama

x.com/i/article/2062…

English
19
42
383
45.9K
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@PhilNguyen69·
@realgabe178 @TeslaBoomerMama If SpaceX merged with Tesla: The combined company would likely stay in the S&P 500 (replacing TSLA's spot). It wouldn't kick TSLA out and add SpaceX separately — the survivor just continues as the member with updated size/weight.
English
1
0
1
50
Gab e Hcuo D
Gab e Hcuo D@realgabe178·
@TeslaBoomerMama Mid 2027 + profitable => very unlikely for SPCX “So on its own, a standalone SpaceX listing would need to wait until at least mid-2027 before it could realistically be considered for the S&P 500”
English
1
1
1
263
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@PhilNguyen69·
@DustinHuntwn Sold 2500 shares at $127.52 Thanks the bear. Will buy back in the 90's
English
0
0
2
222
Dustin
Dustin@DustinHuntwn·
$ASTS The bears just keep recycling the same tired playbook. When ASTS was in single digits, they swore the tech was vaporware, manufacturing couldn't scale, regulators would never play ball, and carrier deals would never generate real revenue. How'd that work out? The stock marched through the teens, twenties, thirties, and forties, clearing hurdle after hurdle along the way. Through the fifties, sixties, and seventies, they screamed overvalued at every step and did everything they could to tank the price. Yet here we are — even after pullbacks, still holding above $100. That's not just a win for the bulls. It's a verdict. We were called delusional for calling $100. Now they're saying the same thing about $1,000. They said that before too. Remember how that ended. And when the stock splits eventually come? This story's just getting started. Don’t just watch from the sidelines. Hit follow and let’s stack together.I'll always keep the ASTS channel up to date.
English
3
2
57
4.4K
Wave 3 Trades
Wave 3 Trades@wave3trades·
Would you rather Buy SpaceX at a $2T market cap Or SpaceX’s direct “competitor” $ASTS at a $40B market cap
GIF
English
6
0
57
3.8K
Boodro's Texas Kitchen
initial will scream up 30% then drop to 40% of the initial price in a day. Later in the week, the stock will be up and down, but stay down around the initial prices at 30%. But in 10 years will be 1,000% increase. A stock to hold on to for the long term, just don't buy on the first day. 50 shares bought at $100 will be $5million in 10 years.
English
2
0
2
95
BigDawg
BigDawg@TennBigDawg82·
@TrendSpider At this rate he may overtake King Solomon as the richest person in the history of the world 🤔
English
1
0
0
737
101
101@101sfinance·
$ASTS would've been at $200 by now if the Blue Origin situation hadn't happened, smh...
English
13
4
225
18K
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@PhilNguyen69·
@growthrapidly Watch the stock price will double by the end of the first trading day.
English
0
0
0
151
Joel
Joel@growthrapidly·
$SPCX SpaceX is targeting a $135 IPO price on June 12. Is that normal? I thought most IPOs gave a price range first, then set the final price right before trading. Am I missing something?🤔
Joel tweet media
English
39
2
40
15.1K
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@PhilNguyen69·
@LeviHoliday4 I'd say build quality is premium. Technology is ultra luxury. We just bought a 2026 Toyota sienna Limited for 56k. The build quality is crappy plastic and technology is 10 years behind our Model Y juniper.
English
0
0
1
56
𝕃𝕖𝕧𝕚
𝕃𝕖𝕧𝕚@LeviHoliday4·
Are Teslas considered luxury vehicles?
English
188
1
68
26.7K
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@PhilNguyen69·
@Automoto415792 Many people have said the same thing, and every one of them has gone bankrupt.
English
1
0
2
282
Automoto
Automoto@Automoto415792·
Somebody will have to turnoff the lights at $tsla after spacex ipo next week
English
6
2
30
34.6K