Physics Researchers (an alias for now)

822 posts

Physics Researchers (an alias for now) banner
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)

Physics Researchers (an alias for now)

@PhysxResearchrs

It doesn't matter who you are, or what you 'know', ALWAYS recognize that you may be wrong / mistaken. So, we must all learn to REASON WELL. #scienceandreason 🔭

Australia Katılım Ocak 2018
151 Takip Edilen20 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
"PhysxResearchrs" and "Physics Researchers" are generic placeholders for our real names. We are not quite ready for all the media attention just yet, so we prefer to use these placeholders, for the time being. SHA256's of our real names included in: tinyurl.com/LogicArgs
Physics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet media
English
0
0
0
0
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
Here's a screenshot from our spreadsheet, and our evidence in a simple graph. The curve in this graph, directly attributable to Special Relativity, almost exactly aligns with the 1998 results from the Type 1a supernovae observations (see refs in the 3rd of the 3 tweets above).
Physics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet mediaPhysics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet media
English
0
0
0
0
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
🔆🔆🔆 How to demonstrate for yourself that the 'dark energy' mystery can be explained with Special Relativity... (3 of 3)
Physics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet media
English
1
0
0
0
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
🔆🔆🔆 How to demonstrate for yourself that the 'dark energy' mystery can be explained with Special Relativity... (1 of 3)
Physics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet media
English
1
0
0
0
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
We have identified a crucial assumption of GR (i.e. velocity-dependent gravitational strengthening) that really needs to be tested, as it may be a fundamentally flawed assumption. To help kick things off, we have two Qu's for physicists interested in gravity (see figures)...
Physics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet mediaPhysics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet media
English
0
0
0
0
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
This may look devastating for our research, but none of this has any bearing on our neo-Lorentzian grav. hypothesis. In fact, it has revealed a critically important assumption of GR, which may be fundamentally wrong. It will be difficult to test, but should be looked into...
Physics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet media
English
0
0
0
0
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
We assumed SR and GR don't predict any grav. strengthening in the vicinity of the plane thru the centre of a moving mass, orthogonal to its direction of motion. But both assumptions are wrong. Many thanks to Professor X for helping us gain greater clarity on the issue!
English
0
0
0
0
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
@SpeedWatkins A NEW logical argument worth considering is the 'Gatekeeper Argument' (...for the existence of a God-like Supreme Gatekeeper / Authority of some kind, underpinning the ongoing, super-stable, unchallenged ("OSU") existence of the Laws of Physics). It is based on science & reason!
Physics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet mediaPhysics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet mediaPhysics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet media
English
0
0
0
0
Physics Researchers (an alias for now)
@JTCMD2 @Atheist_Bot If u accept our Key Assumption in Exhibit #4 (see 2 tweets back), then any physical / naturalistic explanation for the OSU existence of the Laws of Physics will run into a logical circularity problem. So there must be a non-phys. / non-naturalistic explanation for OSU existence!
Physics Researchers (an alias for now) tweet media
English
1
0
0
0