Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Piece
30K posts

Piece
@Piecezilla
Giving away little pieces of myself every day, FOR FREE! CEO: 🧩Zilla Entertainment
Stockton, CA Katılım Temmuz 2014
200 Takip Edilen5.7K Takipçiler

@AnneHatfieldVO Love that he can see the venue from his apartment but still went romping around San Francisco 🕺
English

@Piecezilla Huey was doing ice plunges before influencers. He gets all the cool points.
English


Longtime users are frustrated with X because it no longer works the way it used to.
Back in the early days of Twitter, your reach was simple and direct. If you had 5,000 or 10,000,20,000 followers, your posts were delivered to them in real time. It was a true chronological feed—your tweets showed up in the order you posted them, and your audience actually saw your content.
The “old” Twitter (pre-2016) was built around that real-time experience. Your voice reached the people who chose to follow you, without interference.
Today, that’s no longer the case. X relies on an algorithm-driven, engagement-based feed, meaning even your own followers may never see your posts unless the system decides to prioritize them.
That shift—from a guaranteed audience to an unpredictable algorithm—is why so many longtime users feel frustrated and disconnected.
English

@SergioVengeance @99og_grey @Marcute22 @grok, please continue this discussion on my behalf using Jar jar binks style answers. Thank you.
English

@99og_grey @Piecezilla @Marcute22 That's funny considering the perks of paying Elon Musk for a blue check mark is to ensure his posts show up first in threads. An algorithm and editorial decision he pays Musk for.
English

@Piecezilla @SergioVengeance @Marcute22 Lmao your agreement is not required, the ruling he cited is legally binding.
Besides, what you oppose isn't Section 230, it's the 1st Amendment. Exercising editorial control and being publishers is a 1A right.
You disagree with the US Constitution.
English

@99og_grey @SergioVengeance @Marcute22 My argument is: Ranking, recommending, or amplifying posts SHOULD be seen as a form of editorial judgment — just automated and scaled up, which would not be covered by 230.
Your argument is, "But it isn't now." If everyone thought like you, nothing would ever change.✌️
English

@Piecezilla @SergioVengeance @Marcute22 Section 230 protects exercising publisher editorial control, that's the whole purpose of it. It protects publishers.
English






