Lee Pinkard

@Lina_rays1ya B) No👎🏻

IS MICHELLE OBAMA THE MOST BEAUTIFUL FIRST LADY THE US HAS EVER HAD? A) YES 🙋 B) NO 🙅

@inhisname123 Hell no!

IF I RUN FOR PRESIDENT 2028, WOULD YOU SUPPORT ME? A. Yes 👍 B. No 👎

@MaryLTrump Idiot alert!

I can't believe we're even having this conversation: In the last ten years, NOBODY has engaged in more violent political rhetoric than Donald Trump.

@EliteMan091 I was in Vietnam flying night missions when she was pictured on a anti-aircraft gun in Hanoi, pretending she was shooting down American pilots. So you could say she was "young" or "ideological!" She has proven to a Marxist America hater. Deport her!

Q: Jane Fonda says “ I’m truly Ashamed Of America “ What is your honest response to her ??

@Mark_Wilson_25 Excellent!

🔥 WHAT IF THE TANAKH ITSELF LEAVES YOU WITH ONE NAME? Not because of tradition. Not because of Christianity. But because, when you read the תנ״ך (Tanakh) carefully—slowly, honestly—it begins to press you toward a conclusion you may not have expected. At first, everything seems clear. The prophets describe מלך המשיח (Melech HaMashiach)—a king from the line of David, a בן־דוד who restores Israel, judges righteously, and brings peace to the nations. ישעיהו (Isaiah) 11:9 declares that “the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea.” ירמיהו (Jeremiah) 23:5–6 promises a righteous Branch who will reign as king. זכריה (Zechariah) 14:9 says the Lord will be king over all the earth. If that were the whole picture, the question would be simple. And the first objection would be decisive: ❖ 1. He didn’t bring the kingdom. But the moment you keep reading, the clarity gives way to tension. Because the same Tanakh—without explanation, without transition—introduces another portrait entirely. ישעיהו (Isaiah) 53:5 speaks of one who is “pierced for our transgressions.” דניאל (Daniel) 9:26 says, “משיח יכרת — Mashiach will be cut off.” And זכריה (Zechariah) 12:10 records the Lord saying, “They will look on Me… את אשר דקרו — whom they have pierced.” Now the problem is no longer theological. It is textual. How can the king who brings peace be the same figure who is rejected and cut off? How can the one who reigns also be the one who suffers? This is not a Christian invention. Jewish interpretation itself recognized the tension. Some spoke of Mashiach ben Yosef, the suffering figure. Others of Mashiach ben David, the reigning king. The categories exist because the text itself pulls in two directions. But what if the tension is not meant to divide the identity of Mashiach— but to unfold His mission? Pause and consider that carefully. If you were encountering these passages for the first time, without inherited categories, would you assume two different Messiahs? Or would you ask whether the Tanakh is describing one figure across more than one stage? The tension deepens when you look at the nature of Mashiach Himself. ❖ 2. Mashiach is human, not divine. And of course, he must be human. He must be בן־דוד, from the line of David. But the Tanakh does not stop there. מיכה (Micah) 5:2 says his origins are “מקדם מימי עולם — from ancient days.” ישעיהו (Isaiah) 9:6 gives the child names like אל גבור — Mighty God. תהילים (Psalm) 110:1 presents David saying, “YHWH says to my Lord…” And דניאל (Daniel) 7:14 describes one like a son of man receiving dominion so that all peoples and nations serve him. So which is he? A son of David… or David’s Lord? A human king… or one who receives universal allegiance? The Tanakh does not resolve that tension by reducing one side. It holds both in place, side by side. ❖ 3. There is no second coming. That is true in terms of terminology. The phrase itself is not used. But the pattern is embedded everywhere. In זכריה (Zechariah) 9:9–10, the king arrives humbly, riding on a donkey—and in the very next line, he rules from sea to sea. In ישעיהו (Isaiah) 61:1–2, the proclamation of favor sits right beside the day of vengeance. And in דניאל (Daniel) 9:26, Mashiach comes, is cut off, and only afterward does the destruction of Jerusalem unfold. The prophets place events side by side that history unfolds in sequence. ❖ 4. These texts are being misread. So return to the text itself and let it speak in full. ישעיהו (Isaiah) 53:11 calls the servant righteous and says he will justify many. תהילים (Psalm) 22:16–18 describes pierced hands and feet, garments divided, lots cast. And yet the same psalm ends with a global vision: “All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord.” At some point, the reader must ask: Is this only David? Or is David pointing beyond himself? ❖ 5. Faith in Yeshua departs from Judaism. That concern carries real historical weight. But the prophets speak of covenant renewal within Israel: ירמיהו (Jeremiah) 31:31 “A new covenant with the house of Israel and Judah.” יחזקאל (Ezekiel) 36:26–27 “A new heart… My Spirit within you.” This is not replacement. It is fulfillment—written בתוך הלב, within the heart. ❖ 6. Israel is not yet fully redeemed. And that is true. יחזקאל (Ezekiel) 37:25 promises a future restoration in the land. But the same prophetic sequence reveals something that must come first. זכריה (Zechariah) 12:10 “They will look… on the one they pierced.” זכריה (Zechariah) 13:1 “A fountain… for cleansing.” Recognition precedes restoration. Atonement precedes national fullness. ❖ 7. The Davidic line is broken (Jeconiah curse). This objection is precise. ירמיהו (Jeremiah) 22:30 “No descendant of Jeconiah will sit on David’s throne.” So Mashiach must be: A true בן־דוד A rightful heir Unaffected by the curse The preserved genealogies present two lines—one legal, one biological. The result is a figure who holds rightful kingship while maintaining true descent apart from the cursed branch. What appears at first to be theology becomes textual necessity. The virgin birth resolves a real tension within the Tanakh itself. Now step back. Not one verse. Not one argument. But all of them, at once: A Mashiach who is pierced. A Mashiach who is rejected. A righteous servant who suffers for others. A Mashiach cut off before the destruction of the Second Temple. A בן־דוד king. A figure who receives the service of nations. A future redeemer of Israel. All בתוך התנ״ך. Rabbi Isaac Lichtenstein, a 19th-century Hungarian rabbi, came to believe that Yeshua is the Messiah after carefully studying passages like Isaiah 53, and later wrote: “I found in Him the Messiah of Israel… the One of whom the prophets spoke.” Not by leaving the text— but by following it. And now the question becomes unavoidable. Not: Can these verses be explained individually? But: Who fulfills them together? ישעיהו (Isaiah) 53:5 — pierced דניאל (Daniel) 9:26 — cut off תהילים (Psalm) 110:1 — exalted זכריה (Zechariah) 14:9 — reigning Suffering. Rejection. Exaltation. Kingdom. One Mashiach. And if you follow that convergence patiently, without forcing the text, you may find that the Tanakh is not pointing in many directions. It is pointing—quietly, consistently, and powerfully—to one.

@Tironianae A. Yes

🚨 BREAKING: The U.S. has taken a tough stance, saying that any country that votes against it at the United Nations, chants “Death to America,” or supports anti-American groups will no longer receive American taxpayer money. Do you stand with Donald Trump on this ? A. Yes B. No

@FDogenews32 They hate America ! What is the question ??

@ElonMuskNewsDNA HOPE

@MAGANEWSShapiro 0%

@StandUpForFact Yes!!

Should Ilhan Omar be deported ? A. Yes - per Trump ! B. No C. Tired of politics?

@funder What a joke

AOC just made the move we've been waiting for. She is officially calling for the impeachment of Pam Bondi. 👇 dworkinsubstack.com/p/hope-rises-a…

@TrumpsHurricane Idiot alert! His/Her mother must be so proud! She needs a vocabulary coach!🤣

DERANGED Liberal Woman goes on an UNHINGED tirade and says that MAGA supporters are "deplorable" What is your Response to her ??

@RedEagleUpdates Hell No! I want you in jail!

Would you like to have Obama back for another Presidential term? Be honest A. YES B. NO Everyone better answer this one correctly👆👀!!

@RightScopee 0%

Mike Pence is considering running for PRESIDENT. What are the chances you’d consider him in 2028? A. 100% B. 75% C. 50% D. 25% E. 0% Everyone better answer this one correctly☝️!!

@JDVance JD 100% correct but the left will never stop spinning it. They have to change the topic from corruption, UNPRECEDENTED CORRUPTION! That is the object of the demonstration, " Change the Topic!! No no no

This is preposterous. First of all, she's not waving the officers through and has no right to do so even if she were. She is waving another car through, before the officers approach her car. Second, the officers are not randomly searching her, they are approaching her vehicle because she is violating the law: namely, she is obstructing a lawful enforcement operation. You're not allowed to walk up to or drive up to people who are enforcing the law to make it harder for them to do their jobs. Third, this defense attorney is drawing a meaningless distinction between an ICE officer and a "real police officer." Again, you're not allowed to interrupt a lawful enforcement operation, which is exactly what this woman was doing. Fourth, the officer didn't discharge his weapon to prevent her from fleeing. When he discharged his weapon, she had pointed the vehicle at him and pressed the gas. He discharged his weapon in self defense, and other angles of the video show the woman *clearly* hit the officer with her car while accelerating. The gaslighting is off the charts and I'm having none of it. This guy was doing his job. She tried to stop him from doing his job. When he approached her car, she tried to hit him. A tragedy? Absolutely. But a tragedy that falls on this woman and all of the radicals who teach people that immigration is the one type of law that rioters are allowed to interfere with.

@StandUpForFact Wow you seem to be an educated person. Has the liberal diatribe dumbed you down this bad? Try Ghana! Iran maybe. Good luck

Liberal woman says she’s FLEEING ‘President Trumps America’ for Spain, because he’s deporting illegal immigrants.. Does anyone give af..??

@Emilia__writes @RonDeSantis It is a mandate of the Quran

@RonDeSantis Valid question

Demonstration of the farce that modern refugee policy has become. Seeking refuge in another country only to turn around and vacation in the country you fled? What a joke.

@KristiTalmadge @RonDeSantis Totally agree

@RonDeSantis They are "Economic Refugees" and bankrupting America in the process to enable Democrats' scams. Anyone currently in the United States as a "Refugee" who visits their home country to vacation should have their "Refugee" status and visa yanked immediately. They can stay there.

@flokdex @RonDeSantis This Muslim invasion was NEVER about prosecution! It is a Koran mandate

Refugee policies often prohibit returns to home countries, as it may suggest no ongoing persecution, potentially leading to status revocation (e.g., USCIS guidelines). For Syrians, post-Assad fall, some nations like Germany have stripped status for vacationers, while UNHCR warns of risks like abuses upon return. It's a debated issue—safety isn't uniform. Sources: UNHCR, HRW reports.

@Bitcojner @RonDeSantis That is not solving the problem, it is ignoring it AS A PROBLEM!

@RonDeSantis For the gullible homies x.com/grok/status/20…