dr.pi

ša naqba īmuru

Always say your truth, because those who mind don’t matter, and those who matter don’t mind.

@grotye 😂😂😂

Time still flows forward: entropy, memory, cause, effect. But on the quantum level, it might not be linear at all. Both can coexist. The arrow and the loop. Paradox isn’t contradiction…. it’s structure.

If you do not value your time. Somebody will put a price tag on it.

@501stLegiqn No movie from the quotes touches this. None predicted as accurately as this and none are shot at this level. 2001 is a marvel

This movie was made 57 years ago by the way…

you don’t owe anybody and explanation but you owe yourself a destination.

@robpetrozzo You misunderstand Steve’s job and Tim’s. Steve was about making it clear they are disrupters. Tim’s job is to make sure you know who Apple is. Tim made Apple a trillion dollar company not Steve. Steve is the seed and Tim is the person that takes care of the plant.

Steve Jobs debuted the MacBook Air by taking it out of a manilla envelope that he had on stage with him the whole time. Apple events just don’t have that now. I really can’t see Tim Cook ever caring about showmanship like this… but I’d load up on Apple stock if he ever did.

@nikitabier I have been doing so but still trying to find a way to make it palatable whilst not diluting. Any advice?

Me: Maybe you guys should post useful information if you want people to follow you? Everyone: Bro just dropped the secret algo

On light and darkness: Everything is, by essence, light is not just photons, but the expression of vibration itself. Light arises when essence moves into vibration, just as Einstein’s E = mc² shows that matter and energy are interchangeable expressions of the same underlying reality. From a scientific perspective, light is electromagnetic radiation, carried by photons. It emerges whenever charges vibrate or fields shift. Even in apparent emptiness, quantum fluctuations ensure that photons and virtual particles flicker into existence. In this sense, light is always latent. Darkness, by contrast, is not a substance but a condition of perception: the relative absence of visible photons. Yet even in the deepest cosmic void, there is radiation. From infrared to the cosmic microwave background , along with zero-point energy and neutrinos. What we call “darkness” is never truly empty; it is simply the limit of perception, not the absence of process. Epistemologically, then, both “light” and “dark” are human constructs. They don’t exist independently; they only appear in relation to one another. Neither is more real than the other (they are categories we impose on an unbroken field of activity). This is where science and mysticism converge. When physicists suggest that darkness still has light in it, they are rediscovering what spiritual traditions intuited: that apparent opposites are not absolutes but reflections within a deeper ground. The deeper truth is the pleroma (the fullness of phenomena itself). Light is a process. Darkness is a process. Both arise as dependent reflections within the pleroma’s unfolding. The only true existence is the generative field itself, out of which both “light” and “dark” appear as passing mirrors.

@badboirammy @LUISOLIVAS08 I like Albert Camus will check it out

@PitheDoctor @LUISOLIVAS08 You should read “The fall”

@astuteDan_ray @LUISOLIVAS08 You are right but that’s bit more advanced. I found this explanation encapsulates it best “look at a white LCD screen, is it white?” If you say yes it is, you are right. If you say no it’s RGB, you are also right.

@PitheDoctor @LUISOLIVAS08 The hungry self, the lover self, the seeker self… fine. But who strings them into a life you call yours? The Witness? Or just another ‘I’ smuggled back in?

@Scribblemilk @RealEmirHan why so mad bro.

@PitheDoctor @RealEmirHan You’re a shit doctor if you don’t know the difference between association and correlation! Plus going to the gym hardly qualifies you to know anything. Perhaps you just had shite genes!

Henry Cavill turned down steroids and refused to shave his chest for Man of Steel. He trained naturally, saying shortcuts would be “dishonest” to the character. He even showed producers the Death of Superman comics to prove Superman had chest hair.

@Scribblemilk @RealEmirHan I didn’t Disagree Plus, I am a doctor and was an amateur bodybuilder or physique competitor so I think I have a leg to stand on

@PitheDoctor @RealEmirHan Your research is poor as is your understanding of correlation and causation, he may have trained for the film for that long that’s just a finally bulk and shredding stage, he had size to work with before that, and again I say he has good genetics. You can’t count that out.

@Scribblemilk @RealEmirHan My research shows he trained for 8-12 months so that settles it in your logic and mine. Glad we found a middle ground!

@PitheDoctor @RealEmirHan No that isn’t an elite body, he definitely has great genetics though which has allowed him to build a screen body, if you had done your research you would know that he had been working on it for a number of years enough to validate that he isn’t juiced.

@Scribblemilk @RealEmirHan fair so you think he has elite genetics. I’m trying to figure out where you stand. I can get behind that but the fact he got that physique in a short time says otherwise. This needs 5 years of constant training.

@PitheDoctor @RealEmirHan No that’s exactly the opposite of what I’m saying, seriously you don’t know what you are talking about!

@Scribblemilk @RealEmirHan so you think anybody that steps into the gym with the right diet and schedule can achieve his body?

@PitheDoctor @RealEmirHan Fat free index means fuck all, losing fat even back then is far easier than putting on muscle. If you have good genes to build bulk, that’s all that matters.

@LeonardoLFreire @RealEmirHan Only fair point but this is probably enhanced

@PitheDoctor @RealEmirHan Today we also eat and exercise differently then 60 years ago

@DCurtis201 @RealEmirHan And you never stepped foot in a gym lol

@Scribblemilk @RealEmirHan His fat free index is higher than your average rugby player. Debate settled. His genetics are good but doesn’t mean it’s 100% natural. Association is not causation

@PitheDoctor @RealEmirHan Utter rubbish, much depends on genetics and rugby runs in his family so the genetics are there.