Platnum

Proof of FAILED UKRAINIAN Air Defence Systems first hand! Last night in ODESSA, as the UKRAINIAN ARMY were failing miserably to hit incoming Geraniums , they let off an Air defence Missile, which also missed its target! MULTIPLE times before this has happened and residential units have been Hit ! Consequently, Kiev Propaganda would blame Russia for such intentional and indiscriminate bombing , but as I have shown with proof before , what is seen on this clip is in the vast majority the reality of the matter ! Such Air Defence Systems should be on the peripheral of cities....not in the centre!

So here we are watching the rules (for thee but not me) based order perform its favorite magic trick, of turning performative flexing of might into virtue by simply narrating it as law. The United States has kidnapped Venezuela’s sitting president, Nicolás Maduro, along with his wife, via an operation carried out by Delta Force and removed them from the country. The choreography matters. The message matters more: we can reach into your capital, take your head of state, and call it “justice.” But hey, we'll own that it's about oil and minerals in the next breath, so at least we are honest bandits And the world is meant to accept it because the banner says narco-terror and the megaphone says freedom. But strip the branding off and you’re left with something brutally simple, a doctrine of unilateral capture, the right claimed by one state to arrest another state’s leader by force, without a UN mandate, and without an authorization of war by any recognized international mechanism. This sets an extremely dangerous precedent and raises serious questions under the UN Charter. And that’s the point isn’t it? Because rules for thee but not for me, isn’t a slogan anymore. It's long established Imperial hypocrisy. For weeks, Washington has been tightening the maritime noose, seizing tankers, escalating interdictions, floating the language of blockade (armada) while insisting it’s something softer, something cleaner, something that doesn’t smell like an act of war. Yet international law is not fooled by euphemisms. A blockade is a blockade and blockade is specifically listed as a paradigmatic use of force in the legal logic of warfare. So when Washington behaves like a global coast guard with a private statute book, siezing ships, choking ports, “quarantining” a sovereign country’s commerce, the legal argument from much of the non-West is straightforward: this isn’t law enforcement; it’s coercion by force. An illegal act of aggression. And now, with Maduro reportedly seized, the “quarantine” graduates into the purest expression of that gangsterism logic... if we can’t reshape your politics through ballots, and we can’t squeeze you through sanctions alone, we’ll reach in and remove the human hinge of the state. and that is a doctrine of permissible abduction and every American adversary with means will use the precedent. The Taiwan mirror Now zoom out, because the Venezuela episode is not isolated. It’s part of the same imperial grammar used everywhere else: When China conducts drills around Taiwan, like it's "Justice Mission 2025" drill, Washington frames it as “aggression.” But Washington’s own legal posture is far more hypocritical and laughable than its outrage suggests. The U.S. position, spelled out in its by its acceptance of the One China policy, is that it recognizes the PRC as the sole legal government of China and “acknowledges” (but does not endorse) the Chinese position that Taiwan is part of China. Even when U.S. messaging shifts on the margins, Washington continues to insist it remains committed to its One China policy. Essentially Washington wants the ambiguity of a lawyer and the outrage of a revolutionary at the same time. It wants to “acknowledge” a claim when it’s convenient, then behave as if it never acknowledged it when it wants leverage. And here’s the consequence: if you accept the U.S. legal posture as written, then Chinese drills in waters and skies surrounding territory it claims are not foreign adventurism, they are operations in its own strategic perimeter, which the US acknowledges in accepting the One China policy. Part 2/2👇

🚨🌎 NATO Chief Rutte warns “if Russia attack Ukraine again the response will be devastating”‼️