Sabitlenmiş Tweet
PreciL
3.6K posts

PreciL
@PreciiiiL
Live and Let Live... Is it difficult to understand???
Katılım Ocak 2014
5 Takip Edilen26 Takipçiler

@RituRathaur Imagine speaking so confidently and being this wrong. #SFX died years before the Inquisition in Goa. Blaming him is ignorance or malice, either way, what Khattar said is filth. Read your history again...
English

Dear Hindus ,
⚠️News BJP IT cell won’t share with you..
Do you know 😱😦❓
In double engine ruled Goa, Hindu RW speaker Gautam Khattar has been booked for speaking against St. Francis Xavier.
FIR filed, police hunting him down!
BJP CM Pramod Sawant has assured Arrest in 2 days.
But history books document the brutal conversion drive led by Xavier during the Inquisition era, so what wrong did Khattar speak?
What kind of Hindutva makes Hindu side of the history untouchable?
These are frauds you have voted to power for the sake of Hindutva?

English

@Naamheen1 @RiseBharata You just said God took human form and was born on earth. That’s literally what a birthday is. Celebrating it as Janmashtami doesn’t change that, just proves the meme is inconsistent...
English

@PreciiiiL @RiseBharata Yup… we celebrate Birthday of God Krishna (The human form) not God Vishnu. You got to know Hinduism more😄
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick You’re demanding one line that says universal leader, while ignoring the pattern right in front of you. Peter singled out, given the keys, tasked over the whole flock, and leading in Acts. Scripture shows primacy even within shared authority...
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick There is visible leadership. Local congregations. Don’t you get it ?Not a singular universal leader. Show me where that is written.
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick I nver denied Acts 1 is abt Judas,the point is wat it shws, d office doesn’t end wit the person. That principle,along wit Peter being uniquely singled out (Mat 16, Lk d, Jn 21), is exactly y leadership in the Church isn’t random or purely local. Dismissing that isn’t an argument.
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick You said earlier that Acts 1 isn’t about Judas.
You are confused.And now go. Away. Not going in circles with you. Good bye.
You still can’t explain why these samples point to a singular universal leader. It doesn’t.
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick Church with visible leadership. Scripture says He did....
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick share authority (Mat 18:18), but Peter is clearly singled out with a unique role. Paul correcting Peter in Gal 2 shows accountability, not absence of authority. And no Catholic denies Christ is the ultimate foundation (1 Cor 3:11) the question is whether Christ built His +
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick No one denies Acts 1 is about Judas. The question is, why replace him at all? Because the office continues. Now add Peter being singled out (Matt 16, John 21) and leadership among the apostles is clearly not random.
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick Nonsense . Read the whole chapter of Acts . It’s about replacing Judas .
And none talks about Peter’s succession.
None talks about a singular universal leadership role. Get your act together .
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick 2 Tim 2:2 shows how authority continues. Acts 1:20 shows that an office continues. Now add Peter being singled out (Matt 16:18–19, John 21:15–17). Put it together, continuity plus primacy equals succession...
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick I have just explained Acts 1:20.
2Tim 2:2 talks about PAUL exhorting Timothy (a local leader) to provide witness and leadership to his local people . What has that got to do with Peter’s lineage ?
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick It’s not about Judas, it’s about the office. Acts 1:20 shows it continues. Then you have 2 Tim 2:2 (entrust to others), Titus 1:5 (appoint leaders). That’s a pattern, not a one off.
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick What has Acts 1:20 got to do with anything ?
When you play that Judas ( an ungodly traitor) was replaced by a godly man (Matthias) is not a precedence for regular succession. Good grief, get real.
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick Telling others to read Scripture while ignoring Acts 1:20 and 2 Tim 2:2 is ironic. The Bible clearly shows continuity of leadership, not a reset every generation.
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick There is no lineage but local elders of local congregations. Apostolic lineage is unbiblical. Read scripture
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick No Pope in the Bible is weak. There’s no Trinity word either. What is there? Peter singled out, given authority, and offices continuing (Acts 1:20). That’s succession, whether you like it or not.
English


@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick Calling us a cult doesn’t answer the point. Peter is singled out in Scripture, given authorityand that leadership continues through his successors. That’s the lineage you’re ignoring...
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick And what has Peter got to do with your cult ?
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick You’re reading structure into the text selectively. The Bible shows both local leadership and a primacy among the apostles, especially Peter. Among the apostles, Peter is singled out repeatedly. Ignoring that doesn’t make it disappear...
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick Yes, local leaders (plural) of local congregations under the authority of the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
A singular universal leader is unbiblical.
English

@Letsrunwild993 @Real___iTamara Pointing out inconsistency isn’t attacking a group, it’s questioning double standards. There’s a difference.
English

@PreciiiiL @Real___iTamara "Whataboutism" is a real argument when people try and use specific examples to attack gays and minorities.
It shows people clear biases and hypocrisy.
U ok?
English

@GeorgeSchulte @oliverburdick Christ is the head, but He still built a Church, not just a concept. He didn’t leave a headless, structureless body. Scripture shows leadership, authority, and a visible Church...
English

@PreciiiiL @oliverburdick His church is his body, with him being the head.
All those who believe in his atoning sacrifice are members. Not a religious institution headquartered in Rome.
English

@omgsidewalks Have already been in this situation n got to her in no time. No questions asked...
English

@JoshuaBarzon You trust the 66 books, but not the authority that identified them? That’s a contradiction.
English









