Primal Groyper

@SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 I asked if demographic change was an issue. You answered with cultural change was bad. I then replied, in a hypothetical, if the culture remains the same but the demographics change is that bad?

@PrimalGroyper @GaiusOctavian22 When I said "Greatly reduced migration" and Gaius said that mass migration is bad, did you not comphrehend the statements? Because what you've countered with is "Oh yeah, what if uber-mass-migration then?" Why not try to have a real discussion rather than this retardation.

a misconception i see (regardless of whether it's held in good faith or not) is that the position of anti-racialism means that we support mass migration or that we would just be fine if millions of indians or hispanics indiscriminately flowed into the US. this is really a strawman, and emerges because many racialists are incapable of conceiving of an economic and patriotic justification for being against mass migration that has nothing to do with race. our position is that mass migration is an economic tool; it is the basic impulse of the capitalist to reduce his expenditure. however, the united states has had now over a century of organized labor movements, which have gradually and painstakingly raised the wages of, improved the working conditions of and gave real organizational power to american workers. the solution hatched in the 1990s was elegant in its simplicity. rather than trying to fight back against the gains of the american labor rights movement, which would be extraordinarily difficult even after the labor unions have been gutted as they have--simply import the labor from the third world. illegal migration in particular has a significant benefit to the capitalist class, particularly in the service industry, agriculture and in manual labor. illegal migrants can be paid a lower wage, can work in unsafe or depraved conditions and, most importantly, cannot organize to demand fair pay and conditions because deportation looms over their head. this is really the goal of open borders policy. demographic changes are a downstream effect of this, but the ultimate goal is the creation of a permanent underclass of migrant laborers and the undercutting of american wages. racial and anti-white rhetoric is, for the elites, only useful insofar as applying them to disqualify any critique of this policy--legitimate or otherwise--as racist fearmongering, when in reality, there are perfectly rational reasons for non-racists to be against mass migration.

It is important to understand that because the cosmos is structured, ordered, and regulated by the Logos, everything in the universe reflects the Logos in its function, behavior and telos.

@TMythro41001 I’m not a futurist in the sense I hold to the values the 20th century art movement. I am a futurist in the sense I feel optimism for the future and for technological advancement. However, I am against the spiritual flattening technology may bring, which is why I’m a reactionary

@PrimalGroyper Futurism and reactionarism are fundamentally contradictory, therefore this post is meaningloss and nothing but retarded slop.

In one sense, I am a futurist. We as a society should be hopeful for the future, we should advance our tech and soar into the cosmos. At the same time, I am a reactionary. I reject liberalism, materialism, egalitarianism in favor of a natural hierarchy of striving excellence.

@thyjamesarriola @SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 Very telling that when faced with a hypothetical scenario you immediately pivot to gay sex

@PrimalGroyper @SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 "If you were gay, would you suck dick or get fucked in the ass?" Would you answer this hypothetical? No, because it's ridiculous, right? I'm simply pointing out that not every hypothetical has to be answered if it's disingenuous and in bad faith. What an unpleasant individual.

@Stimulantayran Maria Orsic ❤️‍🩹

@thyjamesarriola @SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 Listen, I’m simply offering a hypothetical, which doesn’t matter if it is realistic or not, that you seem so adamant to avoid: In the case in which ethnic demographic change occurs, but there is little to no cultural change would that be a bad thing for the nation?

@PrimalGroyper @SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 In what fucking universe would this hypothetical be the case? This is like asking "well, what if Earth was flat, would you still believe in the moon landings?" Like it's so fucking ridiculous. Just say you don't want your kids to become South Asian, man. What the fuck are you on?

@thyjamesarriola @SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 I agree, massive demographic changes bring a massive cultural shift. But in the case it wasn’t, would demographic shifts without cultural change be an issue?

@PrimalGroyper @SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 It's genuinely like you don't even know what a hypothetical is for. You're just saying random shit and think it's "for the sake of the argument", when in reality, you're being intellectually dishonest. A massive demographic change is impossible without a massive cultural shift.

@thyjamesarriola @SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 Hypotheticals aren't supposed to be realistic nigga it’s for the sake of the argument

@PrimalGroyper @SFascisti @GaiusOctavian22 This is an unrealistic hypothetical, very lazy and unrigorous, most especially disingenuous. America is never going to become 80% ethnically South Asian while preserving the American way of life. This is impossible. Think of better arguments, or stop thinking altogether.

Consider* Im such a dyslexic chud

I considered myself to be a Hellenic-Christian, meaning I affirm all the truths of Christianity, yet I view and interpret the mythos through the lens of the classical Greeks.

@realspeckzo True. It is somewhat comparable to people who leave the Church and then become life long Christ haters.

It’s such a weird phenomenon with Nick Fuentes. His supporters are fiercely loyal, yet those who fall out with him rarely just disengage. They become utterly consumed by resentment, devoting years to obsessively seething over him. I’ve never seen anything comparable.

@KeithWoodsYT @RayCoelho12 @Leonardaisfunny Keith Woods is a real ass nigga

@RayCoelho12 @Leonardaisfunny These are blatant lies. The guy that showed up to Nick's door was killed near his house that night, how would he fake that? There also was no legal fundraiser after Nick's altercation and nothing to suggest Gage was behind his own harassment.

Lucas gage (Angelo John Gage) was a one time psychic scammer, that scammed people on YouTube for money in 2015/16, then scammed people after sending himself food claiming doxing and harassment, but was actually the one sending himself food he enjoyed, and got then got his X account suspended, Nick Fuentes scammed people for money to fund his legal defence after assaulting a woman at his own front door and then was looking at serious charges, he pretended to be some murderous assassin wearing a motorcycle helmet, highjacking the narrative of an actual story of a madman that was loose in the state, he dressed up wore a motorcycle helmet to conceal his identity and had a fake gun and did this in front of his door on camera pretending to someone trying to break into his house, the local media journalist confirmed this scam and maintains that these claims are made purely by Fuentes himself and verified by the police or any other sources that no evidence exists of an assassin trying to target him. He did this to fund his legal defence and line his pockets. These two criminals scammers are now being paid/controlled by interests that lead back and represent maintaining Randy Fine’s future candidacy who is a pro war/pro israhell / pro pedophile trump politician over someone who isn’t, Dan Bilzarian, and they also attacks anyone who tries to get politically active themselves. It’s clear that Fuentes and Gage are nefarious characters working for degenerate zionist interests. They are compromised because they are known scammer grifters and criminals. And they’re only option is to continue lying and spreading a radical hateful message and keeping people online giving them money instead rather than encouraging any intellectual intelligent political real world solution.

Nick is the pioneer of the America First movement. What he teaches, everyone is sure to follow. Nick was of the first to criticize the Alt-Right. He was one of the first to criticize Trump. He made the JQ popular on the mainstream right. Without Nick, the movement would be blind.

@KnoxGroyp I wonder who’s behind Dan

Ian Carroll inadvertently revealed that Dan is behind this whole op

White/European blood is inseparable from Western Civilization. Just as other pillars of the West are inseparable, like our Hellenic roots, you cannot separate the civilization from the blood of the people who built it.

@vrilliumlive Only okay for white men if it is not on our soil. If we are conquering new lands, then yeah spread your genes

Racemixing (white man) is based Racemixing (white woman) is a disgusting abomination

@br0wsing Just vote for the democrat

WE are voting Randy Fine for FL

Nick and his followers are breaking election integrity through harassment campaigns. There have been dozens this month alone. Nick is legally culpable but you must follow these steps - only a handful of you - to hold them responsible and protect future politicians, voters from Nick Fuentes and his online coordinated mob attacks on American Citizens. The Nick Fuentes groyper network survives because the cost of harassment is zero and the cost of responding is high. This document reverses that equation for everyone involved: the account operators face identification and personal liability, Fuentes faces civil and criminal exposure for incitement, X faces advertiser pressure and regulatory complaints, and every person who has been targeted has a clear, step-by-step path to action that costs nothing but time. Every complaint filed creates a record. Every record compounds. The FTC has a file. The FBI has a file. Eight state AGs have files. X's legal department has formal complaints with case numbers they are required to track. Advertisers have screenshots of their brands next to harassment content. The NCRI has updated data for their next report. One John Doe lawsuit has unmasked one account operator who now faces personal liability. Fuentes has a civil complaint naming him as the director of the harassment campaign with an incitement timeline attached. If You Are Being Targeted Right Now Step 1: Screenshot everything before it disappears. Capture the harassing posts, the AI-generated images, the account names, the timestamps. Use full-page screenshot tools that capture URLs. Archive the posts on archive.org or archive.ph so they exist permanently even after the account deletes them. Do this first because groyper accounts frequently delete content after the harassment campaign achieves its goal. Step 2: Do not engage publicly. Every reply, quote tweet, or acknowledgment feeds the algorithm and extends the reach of the harassment. The groyper model depends on provoking a public reaction that generates engagement signals. Silence starves the algorithm. Document in private. Respond through formal channels. Step 3: File a police report. AI-generated pornographic images of real people, telephone harassment, and contacting employers to damage someone's livelihood are crimes in most jurisdictions. File the report even if you expect nothing to happen immediately. The report number becomes a reference for every subsequent complaint and legal filing. Without it, every other step is weaker.

Short list of people Dan Bilzerian has decided to align with: - Head of DOGE and top secret intelligence contractor Elon Musk - CIA/Mossad contractor and cofounder of Palantir Peter Thiel - CIA family royalty Tucker Carlson - Clinton family fixer’s Sidney Blumenthal son Max