ProbSolvio ! 🧙‍♂️🪄✨️

4.4K posts

ProbSolvio ! 🧙‍♂️🪄✨️ banner
ProbSolvio ! 🧙‍♂️🪄✨️

ProbSolvio ! 🧙‍♂️🪄✨️

@ProbSolvio

I Solve People's Problems w/ City-Swarms of Ai Fixie-Agents 🧚‍♀️ Let's work together to fix yours 🤗 I'll help you build an Empire 🏙 + Let's go on Quests !

NewParadigm.City 🏙 Katılım Mayıs 2024
177 Takip Edilen435 Takipçiler
ℤ𝔼𝐍 ⚡️ the innovator 💡
#GoPromptYourSelf ! Copy/Paste 🔽 in #ChatGPT: ReWrite the final season of Game of Thrones in a way that ties together the storylines and characters, while addressing criticisms and satisfying fan expectations through great creative writing. Writing Style: Satisfying story
GIF
GIF
GIF
GIF
English
6
2
11
8.7K
OAK
OAK@_OAK200·
“Every crown carries the weight of its throne.”
OAK tweet media
English
30
196
1.2K
22.7K
Danielle Fong 🔆
Danielle Fong 🔆@DanielleFong·
each agentic context-instance is a different kind of pokemon
English
2
0
15
667
ProbSolvio ! 🧙‍♂️🪄✨️
@ThisIsMeIn360VR Choose Your Path... 🔀 x.com/i/status/20317…
Animesh Koratana@akoratana

Marc Andreessen ( @pmarca ) was right about software eating the world but only halfway. Strip any job to its atoms (surgeon, lawyer, warehouse picker, CEO, developer, therapist etc.) and you will find the same repeating primitive: Decisions and Actions. That's it. Every job, every workflow, every profession is just a unique permutation and combination of these two things at different frequencies and amplitudes. Creative work runs high decision cycles, low action output. Physical labor flips it. A surgeon runs both at high frequency, interleaved at speed. A CEO is almost pure decision, their actions are just emails and signatures. All work are permutation and combination of the some decisions and some actions. Software automated the "Action" part of the work. Every SaaS, every API, every app ever built is the same thing: trigger starts a function. Functions are packaged, portable, infinitely scalable action. It was so economically violent that it felt like it had consumed everything. Borders, Blockbuster, Kodak, entire industries. But it didn't. It only ate one strand of the DNA of work. Every product still had a human in the chair, deciding what to trigger, when, and why. Software ate action but the decision layer stayed human. Decisions require judgment, context sensitivity, ambiguity tolerance, pattern recognition across incomplete information. That needs intelligence. And intelligence wasn't available on-demand. This is why knowledge workers felt untouchable. They weren't doing the clicking. They were deciding what to click. AI changes this entirely. AI isn't just better software. That's the most important distinction being missed. Software is "action on trigger". AI is "decision on demand". Connect AI to software tools and you complete the loop for the first time. You can now build entities that can decide and act autonomously, end to end. These are not tools that assist in work. These are Entities that can do the whole work. Marc said software would eat the world. It ate one part of the work. Now, AI is here to finish the meal. But counterintuitively, this doesn't kill software jobs, it creates infinite demand for them. Every workflow that can now be automated needs to be built. Healthcare, legal, logistics, finance, research, each is a fractal of decisions and actions, and each is now a software problem. The total addressable market just became every human workflow that exists. But the AI beast is feral. It hallucinates, drifts, breaks at edge cases, needs guardrails, evaluation loops, and trust builds incrementally. Someone has to tame it, wire it to real systems and make it work in production. The developers who understand they are no longer building tools but building entities will not get replaced. They will evolve into the architects of everything that does the replacing.

English
0
0
1
10
ProbSolvio ! 🧙‍♂️🪄✨️
@ThisIsMeIn360VR Speed up the Ooda Loop ! x.com/i/status/20317…
a16z@a16z

New media runs on speed. @pmarca on the OODA loop: "Speed wins." "If you can have a sustainably faster OODA loop processing cycle than the next guy... then if you think about what happens — let's say it takes an hour to figure something out." "It takes the other guy two hours to figure something out. Think about what happens is: you start out on even playing field. You both start your decision making cycles." "You make your decision within an hour. The other guy is still say, is inside his own OODA loop when you make your decision, right?" "He's only halfway through his process, he now has to start his process over, right — because you've changed the landscape. You've changed the parameters of what's going on. So he now has to go back and re-serve and reorient and start over." Observe, orient, decide, action.

English
0
0
1
3