Jessica Methot

1.9K posts

Jessica Methot banner
Jessica Methot

Jessica Methot

@ProfMethot

Prof of HRM @RutgersU @RU_SMLR & DRP @UofEBusiness | PhD in Org Behavior from @UFWarrington #GoGators | Researcher in #workrelationships #socialnetworks

Greater New York City Area Katılım Mayıs 2011
1.7K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Jayne Zirkle
Jayne Zirkle@JayneZirkle·
Zohran Mamdani just became the first NYC mayor in 61 years to skip the Israel Day Parade. Every mayor since 1964 showed up. Mamdani won’t stand with Jewish New Yorkers.
Jayne Zirkle tweet media
English
9.6K
8.1K
30.4K
13.1M
Jessica Methot retweetledi
blue dog geosh
blue dog geosh@bluedoggeosh·
I’d rather vote for the AIPAC candidate than the DSA one. At least one of those is a pro america organization and it isn’t the DSA.
English
417
164
1.6K
565K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Liza Rosen
Liza Rosen@LizaRosen0000·
Sam Harris has triggered the hell out of Hamas supporters online by simply explaining a basic fact: The Muslim terrorists who initiated a war against Israel on October 7 are facing the consequences of that war, not a genocide. They invaded Israel shouting “Allah Akbar”, raped, murdered and burned over 1,000 Jews as Islamic acts of worship, and kidnapped hundreds more into Gaza. They filmed their own atrocities with pride. They chose holy war, aka Jihad. Israel chose to fight back and destroy the enemy that attacked it. That is not genocide. That is war. The people screaming “genocide” are the same ones who celebrated October 7 and still demand more Jewish blood. They started the slaughter and now cry victim when Israel refuses to let them finish the job. Sam Harris is doing what the media and politicians refuse to do: telling the truth without apology. Do you agree with him? Yes/No?
English
1.1K
4.2K
17K
289.7K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
The Atlantic
The Atlantic@TheAtlantic·
Nicholas Kristof's column alleging an Israeli campaign of sexual violence against Palestinians contains “defects of evidence and sourcing” that are alarming many Jews amid intensifying anti-Semitic violence, @davidfrum argues. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/05/…
English
346
112
676
738.8K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
The Moderate Case
The Moderate Case@TheModerateCase·
The “Israel has a right to exist” argument has always bothered me because it accepts a weak premise. Nations do not have some abstract, inherent, metaphysical “right to exist.” Not Israel, America, France, Pakistan, you name the country. States exist because they establish sovereignty, build institutions, control their territory, defend their borders, gain recognition, and survive. That is the realist and only true, logical argument. When someone says “Israel has no right to exist,” the strongest response is not to beg them to recognize Israel’s “right.” This is weak and defensive. That already puts Israel on trial in a way no other country is. The stronger response is to say simply: Israel DOES exist. It achieved sovereignty, built a state, and defended itself through repeated wars. It has borders, institutions, a military, a legal system, international recognition, and a people who are not going anywhere. There is definitely a double standard, though. People do not demand France, Pakistan, Jordan, Turkey, or Egypt justify their “right to exist.” That standard is almost always applied uniquely to Israel, and yes, a lot of the time it is rooted in antisemitism or anti-Jewish hostility. That is exactly why Israel’s defenders should stop making the weakest version of the argument. Israel does not need to defend its existence as if its sovereignty depends on the moral permission of people who hate it. Israel’s case is much stronger than that. Israel DOES exist because the Jewish people returned to political sovereignty in their historic homeland, built functioning institutions, accepted partition, declared independence, survived invasion, defended itself, absorbed refugees, developed a modern state, and maintained that sovereignty for over 75 years. Stop playing into the emotional arguments and get real.
English
405
720
4.7K
128.2K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
The globalized intifada shot 20 bullets into my boyhood synagogue in Toronto. The supposed line between antisemitism and anti-Zionism is a semantic device, not a real barrier. Latest in @TheAtlantic theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/05/…
English
359
513
2.2K
326.2K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Tali Goldsheft
Tali Goldsheft@TaliGoldsheft·
It’s not just a crazy lady in Texas. There’s been a disturbing hijacking of the progressive movement by Jew-haters who deliberately equate Zionists with white supremacists—rhetoric crafted to appeal to the Democratic base. It began gaining momentum during the Women’s March under Linda Sarsour. Now a leading Democratic congressional candidate in Texas, Maureen Galindo, is openly calling to turn an ICE facility into a “prison for American Zionists”—complete with concentration camp echoes. Her rhetoric, if you listen to her, plays right into Sarsour’s messaging. Meanwhile, antisemitic hate crimes are surging, Hassan Piker campaigns with Democrats, a CAIR director vacations with actual white supremacists like Dan Bazarian, and voices like Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens echo the same “antizionist” hate. Wake up, babe…the Nazis are back, and they’ve rebranded as the “antizionist” hate movement.
English
13
78
250
4.5K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Peter Savodnik
Peter Savodnik@petersavodnik·
1. You're arguing in bad faith or very bad at arguing. He's not conflating antisemitism with criticism of Israel. He's saying that the obsession with Israel -- the frothy, laser-like focus on the Jewish state juxtaposed against the apathy with regard to any number of far more serious conflicts -- reveals an antisemitic bias. 2. The notion that Americans should care more about Israel's "crimes" because the U.S. is supposedly implicated in those crimes is risible. Do you know which weapons systems U.S. tax dollars support? Do you know why those weapons systems are necessary? How do you feel about U.S. aid to Egypt and Jordan? Or the U.S. failure to act in Syria, which led to the death of countless Syrians and Palestinians? Or U.S. indifference to the plight of the Uyghurs? Do we not bear responsibility for the things we could have done but didn't do as much as things we did do? Of course, both U.S. and Israeli officials are calling for an end to aid. Will you stop caring about Gaza then? 3. Be honest: You hate Jews. For what it's worth, you also appear to hate Arabs, especially Palestinians, who will benefit enormously from closer ties with the Jewish state. For nearly eight decades, the Arab world labored under the illusion that it could destroy the Jewish state -- directly and/or via the Palestinian battering ram it fabricated. Now, most Arab countries are abandoning the old antisemitism, the old fear of democracy and pluralism and liberalism, the old colonial-style pan-Arabist dream, and coming around, however gradually, to the idea of coexistence with the Jews. Did you not get that memo? Or is it that Jew hate reels in more clicks?
Jenin Younes@JeninYounesEsq

Maher's monologue is so full of illogic and factual inaccuracies it's hard to list them all. He conflates antisemitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism, even substituting the words for each other when allegedly quoting someone. He claims Randy Fine has never called for nuking or killing Palestinians, which is a blatant lie or at best very sloppy, since Fine has done precisely those things. And the claim it's antisemitic to focus on Israel is such a tired one. We don't fund and provide diplomatic cover for the atrocities of any other country the way that we do for Israel. We aren't violating the First Amendment for the Sudanese government, nor are we banning the Taiwanese from this country. North Korea isn't buying an election in Kentucky. Americans single out Israel for criticism because (1) its crimes are horrific and have been going on for 80 years; (2) as Americans, we can potentially influence our government's policy of supporting Israel; and (3) no other country exercises this kind of influence over our laws, policies, and politics. It's not that complicated.

English
17
73
475
30.6K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Ronald Plasterk
Ronald Plasterk@RPlasterk·
Er was geen massale hongersnood in Gaza, er was geen genocide. Het was allemaal propaganda voor Hamas en tegen Joden en Israël. Laten we onthouden wie dit nepnieuws wel en niet kritiekloos hebben overgenomen. commentary.org/seth-mandel/cl…
Nederlands
1.4K
7.1K
13.5K
868.1K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
The Uri
The Uri@uricohenisrael·
Shout out to Bill Maher that dedicated his last monologue to explaining Democrats that they are basically becoming a Nazi party
English
26
231
1.8K
17.6K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Maral Salmassi
Maral Salmassi@MaralSalmassi·
The Palestinian inversion is the propaganda trick that unites Arab national socialists, Marxist postcolonialists, and anti-Zionists. The formula is simple: accuse Jews of the crimes committed against them.
English
47
418
1.2K
17.7K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Michael Roth 🇪🇺🇺🇦🇮🇱🇬🇪
Calling Israel “genocidal” is an antisemitic political weapon, not a legal description. It turns raw Israel‑hatred into a slogan and empties “genocide” of its meaning. We finally owe rhetorical de‑escalation to the victims of real genocides (Shoa, Srebrenica, Armenians).
English
553
165
961
198K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Elad Simchayoff
Elad Simchayoff@Elad_Si·
I spent some time at the anti-Israel protests in Vienna. I want to share a conversation I had there. I spoke to a man who insisted Israel was committing genocide because of the scale. When I challenged the casualty figures he cited, pointing out that by his own math, Israel had managed to kill exactly zero combatants and only civilians, he said that numbers don’t matter. What matters is intent. So I asked, by that logic, did Hamas commit genocide on October 7th? No, he said. Hamas is a resistance movement. I asked whether he considered himself informed. He replied yes. Where did he get his information? Mainly from journalists on social media. Did he follow any Israeli journalists or outlets? No, they all publish propaganda. And how, I asked, does he know that if he doesn’t follow them? He just does, apparently. We spoke for a long time. I think, I hope at least, that I managed to leave him with one thought. There’s a problematic kind of confidence that comes from only ever hearing one side of a story while being sure you know it all.
Elad Simchayoff tweet media
English
124
290
2.8K
110K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Captain Allen
Captain Allen@CptAllenHistory·
This real-time 1948 article from The Economist completely destroys the modern “Nakba” narrative that was invented decades later as political propaganda. Straight from British eyewitnesses in Haifa, October 2, 1948: “Jewish authorities urged all Arabs to remain in Haifa and guaranteed them protection and security ... However, of the 62,000 Arabs who formerly lived in Haifa, not more than 5,000 or 6,000 remained. The most potent factor was the announcements made over the air by the Arab Higher Executive, urging the Arabs to quit ... those who remained and accepted Jewish protection would be regarded as renegades.” They didn’t flee because of “Zionist ethnic cleansing.” They fled because Arab leaders ordered them to get out of the way so their armies could “drive the Jews into the sea.” Then they lost the war they started — and spent the next 77 years rewriting history to blame the Jews. The “Nakba” you were taught? Pure revisionist fiction.
Captain Allen tweet media
Captain Allen@CptAllenHistory

The word “Nakba” (catastrophe) wasn’t invented by Palestinians to describe Jewish “ethnic cleansing.” It was coined in 1948 by a Syrian Arab historian, Constantin Zureiq, in his book The Meaning of the Disaster. He used it to describe the humiliating failure of the Arab world — their leaders’ arrogance, their lies to their own people, their military incompetence, and their refusal to accept a Jewish state. Zureiq wrote that the Arabs had “imaginary victories” and put their public “to sleep” with boasts — until the real disaster hit: they couldn’t wipe out the Jews. The original Nakba wasn’t about refugees. That a rebrand from several decades later. It was about the Arab leaders’ catastrophic decision to launch a war of extermination ... and lose. They’ve spent 77 years rebranding their own failure as Jewish guilt. That’s the only real "Nakba" they can’t forgive.

English
261
4.9K
12.7K
554K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Emily Schrader - אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر
The “nakba” is one of the greatest marketing gimmicks today. Arab leaders were offered a state… they rejected it because the Jews also got one. They then launched an explicitly genocidal war to slaughter the Jews. They lost. Now they claim it’s a “catastrophe” for a nation that didn’t exist at the time. At the same time, many Arab countries expelled or forced out over 800k Jews who lived in their countries in a campaign of ethnic cleansing. Show me what you accuse the Jews of, and I’ll show you what you’re guilty of yourselves.
English
125
468
2.3K
28K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Hen Mazzig
Hen Mazzig@HenMazzig·
“The U.S. Government needs to kill Jews.” Congressman Jared Moskowitz, who represents Florida’s 23rd district, is receiving disturbing antisemitic messages. Note that for the caller, there is no difference between Jews, Jewry, Judaism, Israel, and Zionism. Hate against Israel is a thin disguise for antisemitism. He’s just saying it out loud.
English
55
186
783
30.3K
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Bill Maher
Bill Maher@billmaher·
People say the left and the right can’t agree on anything these days. But there is this one thing:
English
3.7K
4.6K
22.8K
3M
Jessica Methot retweetledi
Strxwmxn
Strxwmxn@strxwmxn·
We don’t talk about other, larger population displacements that took place around the same time of the Nakba (700K) with the same ferocity: • India/Pakistan (10-15 million) • Germans from East Europe (10-12 million) • Greece/Turkey (2 million) • Jews from Arab countries (800K) The main difference is that in none of those cases are activists pretending that they’re “ongoing” or treat descendants as perpetual refugees. The expulsion of Germans from Eastern Europe is probably the closest analogue to the Palestinian displacement. Other than the fact that it was vastly larger, most historians agree that the Germans had it coming to them, having started WWII. Meanwhile, an industry of lies continues to make excuses for the Palestinians, painting them as perfect victims. The Nakba (“catastrophe”) is not a hoax because Palestinians weren’t displaced. They were, and it was tragic. The hoax is the mythology built around it, that the displacement was uniquely evil, uniquely permanent, and completely detached from violent Arab rejectionism. The real “catastrophe” in the Arab psyche was not merely displacement, but the humiliation of losing an ongoing war that many still today hope would end with the Jews driven out of the Middle East.
Strxwmxn@strxwmxn

@RepRashida The Nakba is the greatest hoax in modern history

English
79
674
2.8K
106.2K