ProfTalmadge

1.1K posts

ProfTalmadge banner
ProfTalmadge

ProfTalmadge

@ProfTalmadge

MIT professor & Brookings senior fellow ⎮ Foreign policy, military operations, nuclear weapons, authoritarianism ⎮ Book: The Dictator's Army

Washington, DC Katılım Eylül 2018
2.2K Takip Edilen24.2K Takipçiler
ProfTalmadge
ProfTalmadge@ProfTalmadge·
@clary_co Try to relax, Hegseth just told me everything is on plan, on track, there is no war-widening happening.
English
1
2
33
1.1K
Christopher Clary
Christopher Clary@clary_co·
To summarize the last 24 hours: Israel hit the South Pars gas field in Iran, leading to a qualitative escalation of Iranian hits against neighboring countries including Saudi, which in turn sharply increased the likelihood of Pakistani involvement in the war. Is DC in control?
English
13
14
123
12.4K
ProfTalmadge
ProfTalmadge@ProfTalmadge·
Caine reports in briefing this morning that US continuing to strike Iran mine warfare assets, and A-10s are hunting fast attack craft along the coast. Good that this is happening, bad that it is still necessary in week 3 of the war.
English
6
7
34
14.6K
ProfTalmadge
ProfTalmadge@ProfTalmadge·
Hegseth and Caine both state that the campaign is "on plan." Information not provided in the briefing: - What Marines headed to the Gulf will do - Percentage Iranian launchers or mine laying capabilities destroyed - How war will prevent a nuclear Iran - Whether Kharg Island attack has had any political or strategic effects on Iranian behavior - How long war is expected to last
English
6
13
43
19.6K
ProfTalmadge retweetledi
Lara Seligman
Lara Seligman@laraseligman·
President Trump is pressing aides and allies to find ways to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as gas prices rise. His best bet might be the U.S. Marine Corps. My latest wsj.com/world/iran-war…
English
41
44
90
26.8K
ProfTalmadge
ProfTalmadge@ProfTalmadge·
@McFaul I take your broader point but would push back on the starting premise that this campaign is actually disarming Iran with great effectiveness. It's week 3, and Iran is still shooting, Strait still largely closed, nuclear program largely untouched.
English
2
0
2
378
Michael McFaul
Michael McFaul@McFaul·
The mighty militaries of the United States and Israel are disarming Iran with great effectiveness. After the war is over, how much peace will this disarmament campaign provide? 1,2,3, 5 years? Genuine question. Post links to the best experts.
English
160
31
293
36K
ProfTalmadge
ProfTalmadge@ProfTalmadge·
@tshugart3 This. Unless an adversary's ability to resist is destroyed through brute force, ending a war is a cooperative act that requires agreement by both sides.
English
2
0
1
381
Tom Shugart
Tom Shugart@tshugart3·
The problem with "declaring victory & ending the war" is that the loser decides when the war is over. U.S. victory declaration or not, if Iran continues to decide who goes through the SoH unmolested, or continues to attack U.S. bases & partner countries—then the war is not over.
Kelley B. Vlahos@KelleyBVlahos

Wise words from @esaagar : “The Republican base is clearly willing to trust President Trump up to a point but remain weary of any potential escalation. As evidenced by this polling the wisest move would be to declare victory and end this immediately.”

English
28
22
191
24.5K
ProfTalmadge retweetledi
Suzanne Maloney
Suzanne Maloney@MaloneySuzanne·
So we could’ve had a nuclear deal w/verified limits on Iran’s nuclear activities but @POTUS thought he could get a better deal. And never did. Instead we’re in a messy regime change war w/dire economic & security impacts & an Iran with 440k of HEU. 🙄nytimes.com/2026/03/18/opi…
English
2
2
17
2.1K
ProfTalmadge retweetledi
Jacqueline Hazelton drjlhazelton.bsky.social
Important piece from @ProfTalmadge on Iran and the Strait of Hormuz in @IntSecHarvard @BelferCenter @MIT_SSP still highly relevant today. Free to read.
The MIT Press @mitpress.bsky.social@mitpress

"Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz tops the list of global energy security nightmares," wrote Caitlin Talmadge in 2008 in @IntSecHarvard. The aftermath of limited strikes on Iran would be complicated and costly. Free to read for 90 days: direct.mit.edu/isec/article/3…

English
1
3
5
1.7K
ProfTalmadge
ProfTalmadge@ProfTalmadge·
Quite a disconnect between how much the President emphasized Iran's nuclear program as a motive for war yesterday, and the continued CENTCOM targeting updates that do not even mention the nuclear program. Maybe the theory is that these strikes are all preparatory to some action against Iran's nuclear assets later. But there is a large disjuncture between the stated casus belli and what we're actually observing with the military campaign thus far.
U.S. Central Command@CENTCOM

Operation Epic Fury: March 16th Update

English
7
41
96
24.8K
ProfTalmadge
ProfTalmadge@ProfTalmadge·
Putting aside all the legitimate political reasons allies have for declining Trump's request that they send ships, there are legitimate military reasons to not want to conduct naval escorts close to Iran's shores in the middle of a shooting war. The mission would expose escorts to casualties and ship damage, and divert them from other naval tasks. These are major reasons the US isn't already doing escorts despite industry pleas.
English
10
38
151
18.3K