Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky

1.7K posts

Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky banner
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky

Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky

@PubSci

"Sipping, supping & science" monthly public talks in a central London pub (free / donation). Follow us to Bluesky! https://t.co/G77KO3rG1V for all our links.

London Katılım Nisan 2011
1.6K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky
Many thanks to Prof Andrew Jaffe for a thrilling cosmological talk at PubSci last Week. It's not often you find Beer, Burgers and the Big Bang all under the watchful gaze of a king! Watch this space for news of April's PubSci with Joanna Bagniewska. linktr.ee/pubsci
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky tweet mediaScience in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky tweet mediaScience in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky tweet mediaScience in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky tweet media
English
0
0
0
35
Our World in Data
Our World in Data@OurWorldInData·
The number of cancer deaths worldwide has more than doubled since the 1980s. Does that mean we're losing the fight against cancer? Not necessarily, because it depends on how you measure it. On this chart, you can see three ways to look at the same data. The red line shows the total number of cancer deaths. It has increased by about 120%, but this measure doesn't account for the fact that the world's population has also grown enormously over this period. Another approach is to look at the death rate: the number of cancer deaths divided by the total population. That's the brown line, called the crude cancer death rate. It has increased too, but much less — around 20%. But there's still a problem: the world's population has been getting older. Cancer is mostly a disease of old age, so even per capita, we'd expect more cancer deaths simply because there are more older people than before. That's where the method of “age standardization” comes in. It's a way of asking: what would the cancer death rate look like if the age structure of the population hadn't changed? The blue line shows this age-standardized rate: it's fallen by about 25%. At any given age, people are now less likely to die of cancer than they were in the 1980s. The same underlying data gives us three different pictures. The absolute number of deaths is up; the crude rate is up slightly; the age-standardized rate is down. None of these are inaccurate, but they answer different questions. Age standardization is one of the most important statistical methods for making sense of health data. Without it, population aging can hide progress or mask problems.
Our World in Data tweet media
English
54
602
2.7K
225.6K
Foundring 🇺🇸
Foundring 🇺🇸@foundring1·
There was never any "pandemic" btw. It was one of the biggest psyops of all time. I think AI was intimately involved, if not the main culprit.
English
72
96
888
24.8K
Foundring 🇺🇸
Foundring 🇺🇸@foundring1·
@AeldorThalion definitely part of it but also I think a lot of the reports were mass generated somehow, makes sense it was AI-related. You could search for any number and "covid infections" or "deaths" and you would find an article, but the articles are mostly not even real. It was all made up.
English
10
0
41
840
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky
It's not every day you get to hold Einstein's actual brain (or in this case the only 3-d model of it in the world)! But that's PubSci for you — and the fabulously entertaining science communication of Prof Mark Lythgoe. Watch this space for details of next month's event on 18/3
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky tweet media
English
0
0
1
51
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky
There are still a few tickets for "Naked to the Bone: Next Gen. Medical Imaging" on Wednesday 18th February with the amazing Professor Mark Lythgoe. Grab yours on Eventbrite before they all go. As always, PubSci is a "pay what what you can" event! PubSci-February2026.eventbrite.co.uk
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky tweet media
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky@PubSci

At PubSci next week, the one and only Prof. @marklythgoe of @ucl and @TheCrick presents the spectacular wonders of biomedical imaging in "Naked to the Bone: Next Gen Imaging" Reserve you place now, then grab a pint at The Old King's Head, Weds 18th Feb. eventbrite.com/e/18th-feb-nak…

English
0
0
0
63
LastKnownSurvivor
LastKnownSurvivor@4everwalkalone·
@visegrad24 @AestheticSales_ "Fact-checking, content moderation, trust & safety" are all weasel words for censorship. Do people post falsehoods, unknowingly or with intention? Certainly. The thing to do is counter with facts, publicly, rather than imposing silence. That way onlookers learn from it too!
English
36
23
655
58.1K
Visegrád 24
Visegrád 24@visegrad24·
BREAKING: The U.S. has decided to stop issuing and renewing visas for people who work in fact-checking, content moderation, trust and safety, or related activities like “combating misinformation or disinformation.” The U.S. now views it as "censorship" of Americans.
Visegrád 24 tweet media
English
1.2K
5K
31.8K
2.1M
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky
Only two days until @JennyRohn visits The Old King's Head to talk about antimicrobial resistance and what we can do about it. Don't miss this chance to hear a leading scientist in the perfect setting THere's a reason we refer to PubSci as "Sipping • Supping • Science"
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky@PubSci

On 15th October, Prof Jenny Rohn gives the low-down on antimicrobial resistance, a silent pandemic behind millions of deaths every year, and explores our options. With drug-resistant infections up 69% in 4 years, this may be our most important talk ever. PubSci-October2025.eventbrite.co.uk

English
0
0
0
92
Science in the Pub (PubSci) - now on Bluesky
@FreeMindsThrive @DrNeilStone You're right, these are 'HAARP clouds': chemtrails modified into a nefariously regular array by a secret government facility that's so secret, anyone can visit and they're really happy to talk about their work and they'll give you a tour. Yup, they're just clouds really. 😉
English
0
0
1
29
Bobby Vincench
Bobby Vincench@FreeMindsThrive·
@DrNeilStone Those aren’t the types of skies or lines people point to as chemtrails. You’re being disingenuous, I suspect on purpose (but it’s possible you just don’t know what you’re talking about). It’s public knowledge that there’s weather modification and cloud seeding technology.
English
8
0
1
403
Neil Stone
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone·
Chemtrails. Again. Day ruined. I think they might have mRNA in them too. I am fuming
Neil Stone tweet media
English
366
221
3.2K
48.4K