PunkSOLBrother

@nottellingyou73 What I don’t understand that how Cashcat’s burn is is only 0.86%

Very good sign of $WALLET being the Robinhood Wallet token

@Keetaaahhh @rocketdoc_eth What I don’t understand that how Cashcat’s burn is is only 0.86%

@Punk784 @rocketdoc_eth Do we know the burn mechanics, i.e., is it just a percentage of each transaction?

$wallet fees sit unclaimed.

@nottellingyou73 And don’t forget there are 2 type of burns - one is based on the trading activity and automatically burnt (the 5.48%) and the 21m tokens are ready to be burnt once fees are claimed. So basically 7.6% is already out of circulation in 1 week. At least this is my understanding.

@Keetaaahhh @rocketdoc_eth I think there are 2 type of burns - one is based on the trading activity and automatically burnt (the 5.48%) and the 21m tokens are ready to be burnt once fees are claimed. So basically 7.6% is already out of circulation in 1 week. But maybe someone knows it better.

@ribbita2012 We will sell real estate blind packs

Remember trading Pokémon cards on the playground? That's tokenization now, but with real assets. Everything from real estate to rare art is turning into digital tokens, making your portfolio feel like a backpack full of possibilities!

Hmm… This reply came out of nowhere only after 25 mins of the deployment of $WALLET

@Keetaaahhh I agree, there are certain pretend-to-be-clever KOLs who never heard about 8-k until today trying to spread this BS.

Seeing some claim Robinhood would need to announce $wallet through an 8-K to comply with statutory/regulatory obligations. As an actual American lawyer, I disagree and can envision numerous circumstances in which the creation of $wallet would not trigger a filing obligation.

@obitot0bI DEMO wallet has 1mUSD+ in memecoins on RH chain - if it is compromised why isn't there any sales or transactions?

@Punk784 Not the deployer wallet but DEMO wallet. On arbscan:

My last update to $WALLET I am out until proven otherwise

@Neolawyer1 DEMO wallet has 1mUSD+ in memecoins on RH chain - if it is compromised why isn't there any sales or transactions?

He found that Demo wallet (shared by Vlad months ago and funded by $Wallet dev) funded a fresh new wallet today and that address bought "$1" token. $1 is pumped more than 15x immediately after that. It's suspicious as hell. I think there is a high chance that demo wallet is compromised. So, be cautious before investing in $wallet. @obitot0bI 🫡👏 Demo wallet to new address - funding txn: arbiscan.io/tx/0x1e2dd558f… New wallet "$1" token buy: robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/tx/0x538112b73…

Lot of ‘smart’ accounts will try to convince u that $WALLET is a test token. Just ask them what was RH testing with their deployer account and official logo and slogan in the contract? They won’t be able to answer. Either a RH dev went rogue or RH plans sg with the token.

@SamG1k @thezerokage @vladtenev Its not that simple. They could launch a token if its a fair launch, no own supply, etc. - that would not even require a 8-k

@thezerokage @vladtenev Robinhood is a Nasdaq-listed company bound by Reg FD, insider trading laws and shareholder disclosure rules — a stealth token launch would expose them to massive legal liability

WOW, I found more crazy evidence for $WALLET. The token metadata itself says: “A robust chain needs a robust wallet to match.” That sentence is baked into the $WALLET launch transaction. Why is that crazy? Because @vladtenev tweeted this himself: x.com/vladtenev/stat… Come on. Then there’s this too: crumbs.robinhood.com The page points to a Hansel and Gretel quote about leaving a trail. “I’ve left a trail, like last time!” Hansel whispered to Gretel. Maybe nothing. Maybe crumbs. But with everything else around $WALLET, there are way too many coincidences for this to not be something. VERIFY YOURSELF: Step 1: Open the $WALLET token contract on Robinhood Chain: robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/token/0x0339f5… Step 2: Open the creation transaction: robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/tx/0x63183bb82… Step 3: For the faster way, open the transaction JSON here: robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/api/v2/transac… Step 4: Search the page for this hex: 4120726f6275737420636861696e206e65656473206120726f627573742077616c6c657420746f206d617463682e That hex decodes to: “A robust chain needs a robust wallet to match.” You can paste it into CyberChef and use “From Hex”: gchq.github.io/CyberChef/ This is not hidden in a random image. It’s inside the token launch data. Metadata found in the launch data: I’m not saying Robinhood confirmed anything. I’m saying the breadcrumbs are getting stupid now. $WALLET is getting harder to ignore.

@eip_42069 @rbthreek What type of inefficiencies? And why with a Robinhood Wallet branded coin launched from wallet that is easily traced back to RH? Why not with a clean wallet if they are testing?

@Punk784 @rbthreek Likely looking for any inefficiencies with how the network is functioning since it’s new.. among other things. Is my guess.

Starting to see rumors this may be connected to an actual RH product that most of CT discovered in the recent days, personally think this was a “test” token but if rumors are true then revise that 50m to much higher

@openservai When first burns from revenue?

SERV’s Vision and Plan for Banking In this post we're going to lay out our plans for the banking industry in 2026. Our goal is to bring SERV reasoning into the world’s largest global enterprise markets and establish it as the new industry standard. The strong interest we’ve already received from enterprise is a clear testament to the significant demand for this technology, with banking and finance emerging as one of the most active sectors of interest. The opportunity in this market for SERV is enormous: - Financial institutions are projected to spend $97 billion on AI by 2027, growing at a 29% CAGR, exceeding $200 billion annually by 2030. - McKinsey est. the annual value of AI in banking at $200–340 billion. - Citi projects that AI will add $170 billion in global banking profits by 2028, helping push sector profits toward $2 trillion. This is the trillion-dollar opportunity we are targeting. Why financial institutions are turning to SERV: In banking, where trillions of dollars are at stake, the top three roadblocks preventing widespread AI agent adoption are trust, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. This is exactly why leading financial institutions are turning to SERV. Our technology, built in close collaboration with our enterprise partners, allows financial institutions to accelerate their AI adoption while ensuring it happens in a secure, reliable, and commercially viable way, delivering breakthrough performance without compromising on risk, control, or regulatory compliance. ——- What a bank actually requires to implement agents Every automated system that touches a regulated decision passes through model risk management - SR 11-7 in the US, SS1/23 in the UK - and in most cases, a named bank executive is personally accountable for every AI-driven outcome. That machinery is what we are currently preparing our engine for, fitting all markets SERV is targeting including the US, UK / EUR, Africa, and Singapore. Just a brief look through current compliance ecosystem gives us a good understanding of where things are going: - last April, US regulators revised their model risk guidance (SR 26-2) and explicitly placed generative and agentic AI outside its formal scope. The assurance playbook for agents now has to be built, not inherited from official policies. - this month, the FCA published the Mills Review, laying the foundations for agentic finance in the UK: autonomous agents are coming to retail banking, the regulator will supervise them with its own AI, but accountability stays with named humans. - the EU AI Act classifies creditworthiness assessment as high-risk. After the Digital Omnibus, those obligations land on 2 December 2027 - a fixed deadline banks are being told to spend on governance work. - Singapore's MAS is finalizing AI Risk Management Guidelines that explicitly cover AI agents: full AI inventories, risk materiality assessments, lifecycle controls - and no shifting of accountability to vendors. Four jurisdictions, with one convergent demand: reliability, explainability, auditability, bounded autonomy. None of it can be satisfied by a smarter model. These are precise architecture requirements that our system is ready to meet. The industry's own numbers describe the gap precisely. 99% of companies plan to put agents into production; 11% have (KPMG). 57% of banking executives expect agents fully embedded in risk, compliance, audit and fraud functions within three years (Accenture). ——- How SERV clears the bar Validation: SERV Reasoning Graph Sharding decomposes every agent decision into bounded, schema-forced steps - deterministic code where it can be, model calls only where it must be. A model-risk team reviews a reasoning graph, not a prompt, and the same input produces the same reasoning trace - the property that validation, revalidation, and challenger testing actually require. Auditability: SERV Audit allows insight into decision chains as first-class artifacts: inputs, rules applied, intermediate conclusions, confidence, approvals - exportable as evidence packs shaped for model-risk validation files and AI governance review, and explainable to a supervisor or a customer. Reliability: Shadow Agents and Verification Hints validate every draft at runtime against the brief, policy and constraints before anything ships, and gate irreversible actions behind explicit checks and human checkpoints. Multipath Reasoning lets contradictory rulebooks - credit policy, risk appetite, regulatory constraint - coexist in one reasoning graph, because that is what real banking decisions look like. Security: PromptGuard screens every request inbound for injection before the model runs, and every output outbound for leakage before release. Prompts and data are never stored or trained on, and private, encrypted inference (TEE plus end-to-end encryption) is built for regulated data and residency requirements. Economics: Verification only matters if it pays for itself. Bounded Reasoning Graphs are authored once and amortized across millions of runs, so smaller models execute them reliably - frontier-grade results without frontier-grade unit costs. ——- SERV Roadmap for the Banking Industry H2 2026: - First PoCs / pilots signed with banks and financial institutions - Banking benchmark program opens - Legal entities live across US, Europe, Singapore, Africa - Banking-grade hires: model risk (SR 11-7/SS1/23) - Certifications secured (SOC 2 / ISO 27001) - Neobank integrations - Major DeFi protocol integrations - Fintech pilots converting to paid production 2027: - First Tier 1 bank in production - Agents touching payments under SERV verification - Agentic commerce verification layer ——- Why the window is now Agent-executed payments went live across 30+ card issuers just this month. Regulators on three continents have published their assurance bars. And yet, up to 40% of enterprise agent projects are still expected to be cancelled by 2027 on cost and risk controls. The institutions that win the agent era will be the ones whose agents can be validated, audited, and trusted with real money. One bank becomes the reference, the next ten follow. SERV layer is already running in government production. Banking is next.

@KelchNat What were they testing? Whether a dev at Robinhood can launch a token on a pumpfun clone?

Ok I take this back, from all indication it is a test token. $wallet

@eip_42069 @Nimma_eth What were they testing? Whether a dev at Robinhood can launch a token on a pumpfun clone?

@Nimma_eth Likely for testing purposes. Devs in crypto tinker with all sorts of stuff none of it means anything.

$wallet has to be one of the stupidest things i’ve seen in crypto in a while. Why in tf would the robinhood wallet need a token?

@kaspellion It was deleted from Noxa because revenues would create a regulatory risk under the Howey test. Robinhood is a listed entity, want to avoid any SEC risk.

$Wallet has removed from noxa. That is suspicious for me. I am not gonna touch it. Its obvious that noxa has intimate relation with Robinhood.