Pyro

49 posts

Pyro banner
Pyro

Pyro

@Pyro_Peru

Meta^n-physics, and meta^n-ethics (0≤n≤3). Philosophy PhD - University of Bristol - University of Southampton Funded by the AHRC @SWWDTP 2 Consortium. (He, him)

Bristol Katılım Nisan 2012
87 Takip Edilen72 Takipçiler
Pyro
Pyro@Pyro_Peru·
@BristolLive any idea about that helicopter making tons of noise right now over Bristol?
English
1
0
1
118
Pyro
Pyro@Pyro_Peru·
I'm @pyr0s.bsky.social in bluesky! Please add me as Im leaving twitter in 7 days ;)
English
0
0
0
34
Pyro
Pyro@Pyro_Peru·
@elonmusk Yea, media owners use their power to benefit their favourite candidate. Like you.
English
0
0
1
2
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Exactly
Western Lensman@WesternLensman

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. In this clip: 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check. To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators: "They did exactly what their bosses wanted."

English
12.8K
53.9K
236.8K
37.1M
Pyro
Pyro@Pyro_Peru·
Finally in my hands!
Pyro tweet media
English
0
2
9
386
Pyro retweetledi
Samuel
Samuel@KimptonNye·
Grounding Supervenience
Samuel tweet media
English
3
14
80
9K
Pyro
Pyro@Pyro_Peru·
'Cause grounding is my boyfriend Grounding is a god Grounding is the breeze in my hair on the weekend Grounding's a relaxing thought Aren't you envious that for you it's not? Me and grounding vibe like that
English
0
0
1
72
Francesca Bellazzi
Francesca Bellazzi@FranciBellazzi·
This week started well as I have just been officially appointed an Honorary Research Fellow at the Department of Science and Technology Studies at @ucl, where I will be working with Prof. Emma Tobin on biochemical classifications, functionality and many other related things 🧬
English
2
0
34
1.4K
Pyro
Pyro@Pyro_Peru·
En este artículo que salió hace poquito, exploro el rol comunicativo que jugaron los famosos "azuzadores" narrados por la prensa peruana durante las últimas protestas. Metaética aplicada: revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/estu…
Español
0
0
1
57
Simone Picenni
Simone Picenni@simone_picenni·
Thrilled to share I successfully defended my #PhD thesis 'Exact Truthmaking, Hyperintensionality, and Paradoxes' with Profs. Michael Glanzberg and Richard Pettigrew as examiners! Passed the viva with no corrections at @PhilATBristol! Just too happy about this achievement! 1/2
Simone Picenni tweet media
English
2
2
25
1.9K
Pyro retweetledi
Naftali Weinberger
Naftali Weinberger@DAGophile·
After a few final apps to do this weekend, I’m done with applying for philosophy TT jobs for good. 10 years on the job market has destroyed my mental health. However this pans out, it’s clear that the philosophy community does not value my research enough to ensure me a position.
English
10
6
69
17.1K
Pyro retweetledi
Letras (Lima) - UNMSM
Letras (Lima) - UNMSM@LetrasLima·
📣 #LetrasRecomienda Te presentamos el artículo «𝐕𝐚𝐜𝐮𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐞: ¿𝐄𝐫𝐚 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞 𝐞𝐥 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐨 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐮𝐚𝐧𝐨?» 💉🩸 👉 doi.org/10.30920/letra… ✒️ Autores: Franklin Ibáñez y Pyro Suarez 📆 2022
Letras (Lima) - UNMSM tweet media
Español
0
3
5
466
Pyro retweetledi
Jay Van Bavel, PhD
Jay Van Bavel, PhD@jayvanbavel·
What happened around the year 2000 that dramatically altered youth culture?
Jay Van Bavel, PhD tweet media
English
246
301
1.4K
1.3M
Pyro
Pyro@Pyro_Peru·
@ChillyKni Group F looks a bit bad, but I think it's accessible for Newcastle.
English
0
0
1
44
Elle C-K
Elle C-K@ChillyKni·
Please be a good draw 🤞⚫️⚪️
English
1
0
1
71
Francesca Bellazzi
Francesca Bellazzi@FranciBellazzi·
Would you like to see a bit of meta-ethics into a MA course in metaphysics? I find moral properties metaphysically interesting
English
1
0
6
757
Pyro retweetledi
David Ludwig
David Ludwig@DavidLudwigWUR·
Are you a philosopher confused by anthropologists talking about "ontology"? An anthropologist confused by philosophers talking about "ontology"? We have a new paper for you exploring productive tensions between different ways of appealing to ontology link.springer.com/article/10.100…
English
4
91
344
30.5K
Pyro
Pyro@Pyro_Peru·
WTF!?!? (why the face)
Pyro tweet media
English
0
0
0
58