Coffee Brewing 74k_JD & JH

@RippleXrpie I like higher lows!!! Let's go!!

Leave a like if you are still holding the best digital asset ever created called #XRP! 🙌

@GaryGensler Great, but no one's gives a crap about the words that come from you.

As most homeowners know, when plumbing is backed up … things can get messy. So too in our capital markets. The longer it takes for a trade to settle—the slower the plumbing—the more risk our markets assume and the more risk fundamentally that we all assume. (1/3)

@Ledger And this is why I am done with Ledger.

We are 100% focused on following up to last week’s security incident, making sure incidents like this are prevented in the future, and that the ecosystem remains safe. We are aware of approximately $600k in assets impacted, stolen from users blind signing on EVM DApps. Ledger will make sure victims affected will be made whole, and are committing to work with the DApp ecosystem to allow Clear Signing, and no longer allow Blind Signing with Ledger devices by June 2024. Read more: We affirm our CEO & Chairman @_pgauthier’s promise x.com/_pgauthier/sta… to make sure victims who had their assets stolen on Dec 14th, 2023 by the attacker together with angel drainer are made whole, including users who are not Ledger customers. We commit, by any way possible, including gestures of goodwill, to make sure this is done by the end of February, 2024. We are already in contact with many impacted users and are actively working through the specifics with them. We remind users that if you signed a transaction on affected DApps Dec 14th, 2023, best security practices would recommend revoking any authorized transactions to further reduce impact from the malicious code. We are announcing that by June 2024, users will no longer be able to Blind Sign with Ledger devices. Our commitment is to work with the community and DApp ecosystem to allow Clear Signing so users can verify all transactions on Ledger devices before signing. This will lead to a new standard to protect users and encourage Clear Signing across DApps. Front-end attacks have happened many times before and will continue to plague our ecosystem. The only foolproof countermeasure for this type of attack is to always verify what you consent to on your device. This is only possible with Clear Signing: meaning you can see and verify exactly what you sign on a secure display. If the ecosystem continues to allow Blind Signing, users remain at risk. We ask DApp developers to support the Clear Signing security brick. Please reach out to us through our Developer portal (developer.ledger.com) or Discord (discord.com/invite/ledger) so we can work together to add Clear Signing to your DApp. We have detailed the cause of this hack and our security team’s response to this in a Ledger Connect Kit Incident Report on our Ledger tech and security blog: ledger.com/blog/security-… We remind you your Ledger devices and Ledger Live have always been secure to use, and were not made vulnerable by this exploit. If you believe you may have been affected by the attack, please reach out via our Ledger Help Center to find out more: support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/artic… Thank you again, stay safe and Happy Holidays.

@MarioNawfal If anyone should be removed, it's our current president.

🚨STATE BY STATE UPDATE ON EFFORTS TO REMOVE TRUMP FROM THE BALLOTS: COLORADO: The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that Trump is ineligible for the state's primary ballot, pending a potential U.S. Supreme Court review. MAINE: Decision expected Friday. CALIFORNIA: Efforts are underway to disqualify Trump, with the Lieutenant Governor calling on the Secretary of State to explore legal options. NEW HAMPSHIRE: The state is considering the applicability of the 14th Amendment to Trump's candidacy. MICHIGAN: A lawsuit seeks to bar Trump from the ballot over insurrection allegations, and the Michigan Supreme Court is reviewing an appeal on the matter. Additionally, Michigan may soon join other states in removing Trump from its ballot. ARIZONA: The Secretary of State has said he lacks the authority to disqualify Trump, but the issue remains open. NEW MEXICO: Similar efforts to disqualify Trump are also occurring.

@JohnEDeaton1 Dude, u @JohnEDeaton1 are the phacking man! U need not to explain to no one. Screw the haters and just keep doing you man. The world and the SEC knows who's really corrupt (thanks to you and a few others).

Anyone who has seriously followed me knows this. When I sued the SEC, SEC lawyers like Jorge Tenreiro lied and told the Judge I was a disgruntled #XRP holder who was upset because I bet on the wrong token and lost money. The truth was when the SEC filed suit on December 22, 2020, I had made significant money on #XRP. At the time, I owned 3 tokens, and #XRP was my smallest investment behind #BTC and #ETH. The SEC never lets the truth get in the way of their lies. The case was much bigger than #XRP. But, I did buy more #XRP AFTER the lawsuit because I knew we would win. Plus, It was like betting on myself and betting the judge would follow the law.

I’m going to @AnodosFinance’s upcoming Space. Will you join too? x.com/i/spaces/1djGX…

Today, we are going to talk about the importance of on-chain liquidity and why everyone should participate in the upcoming #XRPL AMM - #XLS30! 🧵1/22

The Real-World Asset (#RWA) Tokenization combined with the Internet of Value (#IoV) is going to be the biggest financial revolution of the century and reshape the digital asset landscape, as well as the global financial system. Why? 👇🧵1/19

@Tokenicer Thoughts on @avax? I am quite bullish on that as well.

95% of crypto content is 𝐏𝐎𝐑𝐍 No, not the dirty kind But the kind that makes you chase materialistic things -Green Candles -Price Predictions -Promises of 100x -Clickbait Titles They're feeding you DREAMS Like always, I'll keep it real with you $QNT won't be the ONLY interop solution, but they're building Internet standards on interopability w MIT $CSPR isn't going to be the only upgradable network, but they're the few building w IBM & Hyperledger in that field $RNDR won't be the only rendering solution, but the biggest media names are already looking there $MNW isn't the only supply chain middleware, but their the only agnostic middleware complying to MLETR $XRP isn't going to capture all of the value in the world, but they'll bridge all assets past, present & future $NXRA won't be the DeFacto DeFi solution, but they'll have everything institutions need to leverage CeDeFi $KAS likely won't see the level of enterprise adoption as other enterprise chains, but they'll likely see STRONG academic adoption $TRIAS won't be the only machine trust solution, but Huawei is already using their team patents for 5G trust $HBAR council isn't going to make all other L1s irrelevant, but Hedera Services extend to other layers $LEOX won't be the only pNFT solution, but they're the first public one built on Overledger $STATS isn't the only on-chain platform, but its the first to incorporate a fully community governed consensus $DAG won't see all the data on HGTP, but they've built a military grade platform for anyone to build data focused businesses $TAO won't have everything AI on there, but with its open network their AI will only grow exponentially faster $IOTA won't be the sole layer for machine comms, but they'll be a multi-purposed industry utilities $EWT isn't going to see all the energy trading on EWC, but DERs are already registered in their system $LCX will be FAR from the only regulated exchange, but they're the first to do so under Liechtenstein TVTG $XDC won't be the only one to close the trade finance gap, but they're already playing a large role $ALGO won't be the only heavily academically backed L1, but they have some of the smartest academias behind them $LINK won't be the only data oracle, but it holds a SIGNIFICANT share already $INX won't be the only regulated security token platform, but they're MUCH further along than 99% of other STO platforms $FIL will be one of MANY on-chain storage solutions, but they've already got connections & usage from Internet Archive, Hyperledger & Wikipedia $AZERO will probably see other L1s embedding a L2 organically, but few will have the level of brains & connections in their team Never forget, 0 emotions🔑

If you’re a teenager, these are the 4 steps you should be focusing on: 1) Find a way to make money (either by working a job or starting a business) 2) Live with your parents for as long as you can (free rent and food) 3) Forget about status games. Avoid partying too frequently. Save as much money as you can. 4) Diversify into solid projects during a Crypto bear market. Make money. Save money. Invest money. 95% of the people around you are doing the exact opposite. 95% of the people around you are broke. Coincidence? To be clear: I’m not saying you should lock yourself into your room and forget about living. I’m showing you how to play the game in a smarter way so you can avoid falling into some big fat traps. A little bit of delayed gratification will only improve you as a human being. This was LEVEL 1. Let me know if you’d like me to talk about LEVEL 2. I wish you an amazing week❤️‍🔥

With so many things to look forward to regarding #Songbird and the #FlareNetwork, there is no doubt... The Future is Bright! ☀️ RT if you agree!

@ElonMuskAOC X.......RP!!

Describe 𝕏 in one word… I’ll go first, “everything”

If Ripple loses to the SEC there won’t be any money collected for years and ONLY if Ripple loses on appeal. If the Supreme Court takes it on appeal (which I believe they will if Congress hasn’t acted by then), I believe Ripple hands down wins with this Supreme Court. If the SEC wins Ripple will Appeal and the status quo that exists today will continue over the next 2-5 years. Assuming the SEC wins, and the civil case lawyers get a win because the judge in California follows Judge Torres’ ruling, Ripple will appeal that case as well and there will be no money for years, if ever. Five years from now, if Ripple loses all the appeals, the SEC would then collect the money (ie $1.3B) - not the civil plaintiffs. The SEC would then offer a payback - a fund for XRP holders to sell their XRP (this is what happened in Veritaseum). If I were the Plaintiff’s attorney in the civil case I would want the SEC to lose because the SEC winning will gut the damages for the civil case. Ironically, If there was a recovery, XRP holders would get more money from the SEC fund because in the civil case the lawyers will get between 25-35% of the recovery for attorney fees BEFORE the costs of the case are deducted from the fund. Being on the 75K list is actually a good thing because a massive putative class of #XRPHolders is easily identifiable. By joining the class list I put out, NO ONE WAIVED ANYTHING whatsoever by joining the list. In fact, if there was ever any money for XRP holders, from the civil case or the SEC case, I’d likely be contacted because you have to give notice of the recovery to XRP holders and I am in possession of a list of 75K. You must ignore the morons out there who claim by joining the 75K list and arguing XRP isn’t a security is a bad thing if there is one day a monetary recovery for XRP holders. These morons have no idea what they’re talking about. A person can believe that the asset they own isn’t a security but if that person is wrong because a judge and appellate court says otherwise, you don’t get punished for being wrong. If there was a fund that allowed you to sell your XRP to the SEC or back to Ripple because of a civil lawsuit you would NOT be denied because you joined the list saying otherwise. Anyone who tells you different is an idiot. But the reality is I doubt the civil case leads to anything. If the SEC wins in the end, it would collect the most money and offer the best option, ironically. Also, if Ripple loses and Congress fixes this regulatory mess during the 5 years of appeals, it all goes away anyway. Bottom line, being on the list didn’t waive anything and, if anything, it identified your claims (if you have any) long ago.

If it wasn’t already clear, it should be now – Chair Gensler’s laughable “pro-innovation” stance (as he said today), is exactly the opposite. What this also tells me is that the SEC is throwing lawsuits at the wall and hoping they distract from the agency’s FTX debacle.

Trying something new – some thoughts from me on the events (specifically the release of the Hinman documents) of this week. For me, this has all had a personal bent to it - and felt like it warranted some personal comments.

And now Gensler point blank refuses to comment on specific projects (besides BTC) but indirectly and incorrectly labels tokens as securities in lawsuits, and in the next breath, says how “clear the rules are” while his agency tries to front-run Congress.

Everyone tweet, retweet, and share this! get it trending! #FireGaryGensler #GaryGensler

@witchcomics @Leerzeit Scamm....watch out folks. Nothing is free!!

"The emails are a nothing burger". Yeah, all they prove is that Hinman was persistently warned to avoid any references to Ethereum and refrain from mentioning it entirely in his speech. Because his references would be inconsistent with the actual policy of the speech, implying that Ethereum is, in fact, a security. Which would lead to substantial market confusion. Despite these warnings, Hinman not only neglected this advice and even doubled down focusing his entire speech on giving ETH a regulatory monopoly. Such a clumsy director.

@GaryGensler @GaryGensler you do know that everytime your assistant Twitter handler posts something for you that the responses are all positive right? Like, everyone loves you man. Sincerly: My most sarcastic voice...

There's nothing about the crypto securities markets that suggests that investors & issuers are less deserving of the protections of our securities laws. Congress could have said in the 1930s that the securities laws applied only to stocks & bonds. For more, read my remarks:

The time to restore sanity to @SECGov is NOW. #FireGaryGensler foxnews.com/politics/house…