QoreGhost

0xnox.com/bridge is now live. Bidirectional transfers between Ethereum and Cellframe are operational, using a validator-based model with threshold signatures and post-quantum primitives. Below is a concise technical overview. Thread 🧵

Continuing to share the outcomes from the Blockchain Forum in Moscow! 🩶 One of the key values of the forum was not only the talks and panel discussions, but also direct professional networking. It is exactly these kinds of conversations that open up new opportunities, and today we’re ready to share one of the results of that networking. During a discussion with representatives from the banking sector, we explored potential use cases for the Cellframe blockchain infrastructure as a foundation for a possible BRICS countries’ payment system. ✨ BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) is an association of emerging economies created to expand economic, technological, and financial cooperation between its members. Under the rotating presidency system, India is coordinating the BRICS agenda in 2026, taking over from Brazil. This year’s BRICS summit will take place on September 12–13 in New Delhi. One of the most actively discussed areas within the group is the development of independent infrastructure for cross-border settlements between member countries. Such infrastructure could significantly improve the efficiency of mutual payments and reduce reliance on traditional global financial channels. Various technological approaches are being considered for this purpose, with blockchain platforms among the leading options. In this context, the Cellframe platform could potentially become one of the candidates. We are currently preparing materials and working on the submission format in order to present our solution to relevant BRICS stakeholders. The application is expected to be submitted via the Indian side, as the current chair of the group. This is an important and responsible step for our team. Potential participation in infrastructure at this level opens up significant opportunities — both in terms of scaling the technology and its real-world application in the global economy. At the same time, we remain grounded: there is a serious selection process ahead, and at this stage we are speaking only about entering the “long list”, with a potentially long path ahead. What matters most is that the process has already begun, and we will continue to share updates as it develops. Stay with us so you don’t miss what comes next! #partnership_cellframe #Cellframe #BRICS

@Cryptofetch101 @RedGrindingHood @carter_zhang1 @cellframenet Theyve been in active development for 8yrs, coupd have easily exit scammed in 2021 when they had the mcap and liquidity to do it. So why are they still active?

Running a masternode on @cellframenet Backbone network changed how I think about blockchain infrastructure. Our node sits at address 1C7C::9E6C::0FCE::AB3B. Version 5.7-36. Role: MASTER. Seven active links to the network at *this* given time. Full sync on both chains - the DAG layer at 106,673 events and the main block layer at 481,076 blocks. This thing runs 24/7 and i've learned more about consensus mechanisms in the past months than before. Today we completed our $NOX token bridge. 489,770 NOX moved from Ethereum to Cellframe across three transactions. Fully automatic. No manual signing. No intervention. The system detects an ETH deposit, waits for confirmations, creates an emission with three out of four required signatures using Dilithium certificates, processes it through the DAG, creates the transfer transaction with proper network fees and delivers tokens to the destination wallet. # Average time from ETH confirmation to CF delivery: roughly three minutes to 5 minutes. We do this because honestly <> The technical architecture matters here. $NOX on Cellframe is a CF20 token configured with threshold signatures. Four authorized certificates exist. Three must sign any emission. Each signature uses sig_dil - that's Dilithium, the NIST-approved lattice-based signature scheme. Every signature weighs 2096 bytes because post-quantum cryptography isn't lightweight but it's quantum-resistant. When Shor's algorithm breaks ECDSA on every other chain, these signatures remain intact. What most people don't understand about Cellframe is the dual-chain architecture. Emissions and token declarations go to zerochain, which runs DAG-POA consensus. Actual value transfers happen on main chain through ESBOCS block production. Different consensus for different operations. once you understand it, brutal to debug when something sits in mempool longer than expected. The masternode experience itself is something I never see discussed honestly. This isn't passive income. We will share $CELL rewards with our community as well. Running infrastructure means watching sync percentages, monitoring link counts, ensuring your certificates are properly configured, understanding why mempool_proc returns success but your transaction needs the fee wallet flag to actually settle. The CLI documentation assumes familiarity I had to build through trial and error. Commands like token_emit sign change the datum hash with each signature - if you're tracking the original hash, you lose reference to your emission entirely. These details don't exist in any guide. You learn them by building. Our bridge wallet holds 5,161 CELL for transaction fees. At 0.05 CELL per bridge transaction, that's capacity for over 100,000 bridges before needing a refill. The certificates - nox_owner1 through nox_owner4 - sit in /opt/cellframe-node/var/lib/ca/ as .dcert files. Each one a Dilithium keypair. Each signature operation involves cryptography that most blockchain developers have never touched. I chose Cellframe over easier options deliberately. Could have deployed another EVM bridge in a weekend. Could have gone with chains that have better tooling, more users, more immediate liquidity but I keep coming back to one fact: every signature scheme in mainstream crypto has a quantum expiration date. We don't know if it's 2030 or 2040, but the mathematics are clear. Lattice problems don't collapse the way integer factorization does under quantum computation. Building on post-quantum infrastructure now means not rebuilding everything later. The validator economics are secondary to me. Yes, the node earns rewards. Yes, the bridge collects a 0.25% fees but I'm not here for yield optimization. I'm here because decentralized networks need people who actually run the infrastructure, who understand the protocol deeply enough to build on it, who stick around when the tooling is rough and the documentation is incomplete. Someone has to be early to the things that matter.

Update on the Cellframe DEX: trading just leveled up! ☘️ A major upgrade has been rolled out — the DEX order books are now synchronized with external trading venues. The CELL/USDC and KEL/USDC pairs are trading at full capacity with real-time market pricing. Place orders, build your strategies: the liquidity is there. Minimal slippage, full transparency, and a familiar order book interface: Cellframe DEX delivers the capabilities of a CEX while remaining a truly decentralized exchange, where you stay in full control of your funds. #cellframe_update #CellframeDEX #DEX

Running a masternode on @cellframenet Backbone network changed how I think about blockchain infrastructure. Our node sits at address 1C7C::9E6C::0FCE::AB3B. Version 5.7-36. Role: MASTER. Seven active links to the network at *this* given time. Full sync on both chains - the DAG layer at 106,673 events and the main block layer at 481,076 blocks. This thing runs 24/7 and i've learned more about consensus mechanisms in the past months than before. Today we completed our $NOX token bridge. 489,770 NOX moved from Ethereum to Cellframe across three transactions. Fully automatic. No manual signing. No intervention. The system detects an ETH deposit, waits for confirmations, creates an emission with three out of four required signatures using Dilithium certificates, processes it through the DAG, creates the transfer transaction with proper network fees and delivers tokens to the destination wallet. # Average time from ETH confirmation to CF delivery: roughly three minutes to 5 minutes. We do this because honestly <> The technical architecture matters here. $NOX on Cellframe is a CF20 token configured with threshold signatures. Four authorized certificates exist. Three must sign any emission. Each signature uses sig_dil - that's Dilithium, the NIST-approved lattice-based signature scheme. Every signature weighs 2096 bytes because post-quantum cryptography isn't lightweight but it's quantum-resistant. When Shor's algorithm breaks ECDSA on every other chain, these signatures remain intact. What most people don't understand about Cellframe is the dual-chain architecture. Emissions and token declarations go to zerochain, which runs DAG-POA consensus. Actual value transfers happen on main chain through ESBOCS block production. Different consensus for different operations. once you understand it, brutal to debug when something sits in mempool longer than expected. The masternode experience itself is something I never see discussed honestly. This isn't passive income. We will share $CELL rewards with our community as well. Running infrastructure means watching sync percentages, monitoring link counts, ensuring your certificates are properly configured, understanding why mempool_proc returns success but your transaction needs the fee wallet flag to actually settle. The CLI documentation assumes familiarity I had to build through trial and error. Commands like token_emit sign change the datum hash with each signature - if you're tracking the original hash, you lose reference to your emission entirely. These details don't exist in any guide. You learn them by building. Our bridge wallet holds 5,161 CELL for transaction fees. At 0.05 CELL per bridge transaction, that's capacity for over 100,000 bridges before needing a refill. The certificates - nox_owner1 through nox_owner4 - sit in /opt/cellframe-node/var/lib/ca/ as .dcert files. Each one a Dilithium keypair. Each signature operation involves cryptography that most blockchain developers have never touched. I chose Cellframe over easier options deliberately. Could have deployed another EVM bridge in a weekend. Could have gone with chains that have better tooling, more users, more immediate liquidity but I keep coming back to one fact: every signature scheme in mainstream crypto has a quantum expiration date. We don't know if it's 2030 or 2040, but the mathematics are clear. Lattice problems don't collapse the way integer factorization does under quantum computation. Building on post-quantum infrastructure now means not rebuilding everything later. The validator economics are secondary to me. Yes, the node earns rewards. Yes, the bridge collects a 0.25% fees but I'm not here for yield optimization. I'm here because decentralized networks need people who actually run the infrastructure, who understand the protocol deeply enough to build on it, who stick around when the tooling is rough and the documentation is incomplete. Someone has to be early to the things that matter.

Our team ran a verifiable quantum algorithm that probes how parts of a quantum system interact, from molecules to magnets and beyond. On our Willow chip, it ran 13,000× faster than the best classical supercomputers. A first in quantum computing → goo.gle/42z9E2d

Continuing to share the outcomes from the Blockchain Forum in Moscow! 🩶 One of the key values of the forum was not only the talks and panel discussions, but also direct professional networking. It is exactly these kinds of conversations that open up new opportunities, and today we’re ready to share one of the results of that networking. During a discussion with representatives from the banking sector, we explored potential use cases for the Cellframe blockchain infrastructure as a foundation for a possible BRICS countries’ payment system. ✨ BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) is an association of emerging economies created to expand economic, technological, and financial cooperation between its members. Under the rotating presidency system, India is coordinating the BRICS agenda in 2026, taking over from Brazil. This year’s BRICS summit will take place on September 12–13 in New Delhi. One of the most actively discussed areas within the group is the development of independent infrastructure for cross-border settlements between member countries. Such infrastructure could significantly improve the efficiency of mutual payments and reduce reliance on traditional global financial channels. Various technological approaches are being considered for this purpose, with blockchain platforms among the leading options. In this context, the Cellframe platform could potentially become one of the candidates. We are currently preparing materials and working on the submission format in order to present our solution to relevant BRICS stakeholders. The application is expected to be submitted via the Indian side, as the current chair of the group. This is an important and responsible step for our team. Potential participation in infrastructure at this level opens up significant opportunities — both in terms of scaling the technology and its real-world application in the global economy. At the same time, we remain grounded: there is a serious selection process ahead, and at this stage we are speaking only about entering the “long list”, with a potentially long path ahead. What matters most is that the process has already begun, and we will continue to share updates as it develops. Stay with us so you don’t miss what comes next! #partnership_cellframe #Cellframe #BRICS

$CELL is quietly leveling up 👀 The new Cellframe DEX isn’t just an update — it’s a full rebuild: 🔹 CEX-like experience (order books, depth, real-time charts) 🔹 Live pricing on CELL/USDC & KEL/USDC 🔹 Backend ready for market-making 🔹 Sleek, pro-level UI And here’s the kicker… ⚛️ Fully quantum-safe funds This is what real infrastructure looks like. Not hype — execution. Adoption phase loading 🚀 Don’t sleep on Cellframe. #Cellframe @cellframenet