Quasar Validator

822 posts

Quasar Validator banner
Quasar Validator

Quasar Validator

@Quasarstaking

Cosmos Hub Validator $ATOM $DGN $ELYS $SIDE $P2P

Cosmos Katılım Temmuz 2024
160 Takip Edilen364 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
Hello @cosmoshub! We finished English version of our neuroworker and now you can find anything you want about @cosmoshub by asking it 👇 t.me/QuasarValidato… We are ready to share it with teams and projects to make Cosmos space better! Find more in the thread
English
9
7
29
8K
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
Some updates 👇 • All assets must be withdrawn from the @StargazeZone network by May 15th - the native network will stop after May 15th • Jae Kwon released a big post saying that he stops using and goes into religion, and also apologized to ICL for the attacks • @cosmosrescue launched a swap tool - atomcircuit.net / - $ATOM will be paid off from swap fees • @RoboMcGobo says there will be important announcements by the end of the month
English
0
0
0
61
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
Scam proposal alert 🚨 The latest Cosmos Hub proposal #1030 is a scam - we voted “NO WITH VETO” Don’t click any links there and stay safe
Quasar Validator tweet media
English
0
0
0
61
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
We vote “NO” the Osmosis Proposal and here is why 👀 1. The asked amount is huge and it will drain the CP 2. ICL is not planning to develop and run the Osmosis DEX - so money will be spend for nothing 3. Osmosis has a great product but in the current state it is not able to compete with top tier DEXes 4. We strongly believe that Cosmos needs its own DEX but not for such price 5. No structured plan for technical side of the migration, the future maintenance and development In our opinion, this is not the win/win deal for Cosmos Hub and $ATOM holders and we would go with “YES” for Osmosis merge with much lower price and better structured plan, but, unfortunately, with the current state it is “NO”
English
6
3
30
2.8K
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
$GNO AirDrop checker is live 👀 gno.land/r/gnoland/coins - use your Cosmos address Who is eligible? • $ATOM snapshot 20 May 2022 • Vote “NO” and “NO WITH VETO” on 69 proposal Check your allocations!
English
0
0
1
263
Tagz
Tagz@Taglex77·
@Quasarstaking I don’t get the « unfavorable terms for Osmo holders » what did they expect? Token price is already failing and could be bellow buying price in a few months. Maybe it’s a steal and ATOM holders are paying to high considering what it will be a 6 months / 1 year
English
1
0
1
87
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
New drama surrounding Osmosis deal 👀 Osmosis recently came up with a proposal to migrate to Cosmos (forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-dra…), which was initially received with great positivity, since its own DEX for Space is a very important and necessary part for future development. But in the process of discussing the proposal, a number of unpleasant circumstances came to light👇 • the deal price is $23 million • conversion of the $OSMO token to $ATOM on very unfavorable terms for $OSMO holders • the prospects for DEX's future development are unclear, as the Osmosis team is leaving the project As a validator, we will wait for a more structured proposal to make a final decision, because the Cosmos really needs its own DEX and Osmosis is a great product, but so far this proposal does not look optimal and contains a lot of nuances.
English
9
2
23
3K
⚛
@ninjarobot·
@Quasarstaking Move to Cosmos, keep the OSMO token.
English
1
0
1
85
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
@DPodocasts Marketing can help a lot, but the DEX on Hub will be good for $ATOM for sure
English
1
0
1
148
Crypto Norway
Crypto Norway@stetun3·
@Quasarstaking Thanks for the insight – as #63 with 556k $ATOM, your vote carries weight. Makes sense to lean NO until we see a revised draft with better terms and clear fee/revenue paths. If it improves, e.g., fairer OSMO conversion + guaranteed Hub treasury accrual, could that flip to YES?
English
1
0
0
92
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
@stetun3 We are the 63th atm (556,5k $ATOM) and now it looks more like “NO” on this proposal, but we are waiting for a better structured proposal
English
1
0
3
247
Crypto Norway
Crypto Norway@stetun3·
@Quasarstaking Agree – more clarity needed on price, conversion rates, and team transition. The buzz for a native DEX on Hub is solid, and concerns are fair. A well-structured merger could benefit both: - Hub gains an active DEX for trading activity, IBC traffic, and fees to ATOM stakers/treasury (as draft outlines with governance revenue). - Osmosis gets stronger security, governance support, and a path forward. We need each other long-term. Hoping for updated prop with clear fee estimates and post-merger plans. What's your validator threshold to support? ⚛️
English
1
0
4
313
Ed | AirdropGlideApp
Ed | AirdropGlideApp@AirdropGlideApp·
@QCEeOAKsJyscJRw @Quasarstaking OSMO holders absolutely want this to go through, otherwise their investment goes to zero. Cosmos Hub investors probably need this to go through too, or the last app of the Cosmos ecosystem dies, probably along with Cosmos in general.
English
3
0
3
99
Ed | AirdropGlideApp
Ed | AirdropGlideApp@AirdropGlideApp·
@Quasarstaking I'm not saying saving is the right thing to do, I'm just saying OSMO holders will be biting the hand off Cosmos Hub for this to go through. Nothing is unfavorable for OSMO holders.
English
1
0
6
232
Dmitriy
Dmitriy@QCEeOAKsJyscJRw·
@Quasarstaking If the Osmosis team made a good product, why are they leaving? I think they're unsure of Osmosis's future and just want to sell it for a higher price. At first, they were actively selling Osmosis, but now that the price is at rock bottom, they're selling Osmosis.
English
2
0
4
171
Quasar Validator
Quasar Validator@Quasarstaking·
@AirdropGlideApp So, you would like to say that Cosmos Hub should pay to safe the Osmo holders because the devs wanna leave, right? Meanwhile, a year ago there was a discussion about Osmosis migration and Osmosis refused it, why so?
English
2
0
4
374
Ed | AirdropGlideApp
Ed | AirdropGlideApp@AirdropGlideApp·
@Quasarstaking "unfavorable terms for $OSMO holders" The OSMO token will be worth zero if this doesn't go through.
English
4
0
20
1.2K
Quasar Validator retweetledi