Man in the Mirror

17.6K posts

Man in the Mirror banner
Man in the Mirror

Man in the Mirror

@RCMarioKart

Katılım Ocak 2021
260 Takip Edilen593 Takipçiler
Financial Times
GameStop, the video game retailer and iconic meme stock, has announced an attempt to take over the much larger eBay. ft.trib.al/Ku25AAe
English
16
20
108
15.8K
Man in the Mirror retweetledi
Anthony Pompliano 🌪
Anthony Pompliano 🌪@APompliano·
FULL INTERVIEW: @ryancohen explains his plan to acquire eBay. He unpacks his pitch to institutional investors, why eBay is so horribly run, and how Ryan plans to create billion in shareholder value. $GME $EBAY
English
278
908
4K
317.4K
TULGAR CAPITAL
TULGAR CAPITAL@mgyaldiz·
@Reuters Buying a company 4x your size with a "trust me bro" and some trading cards—classic GameStop. Even eBay won't "Buy It Now" at that price.
English
1
0
1
29
VELVAVOID
VELVAVOID@VELVAVOID1·
@Reuters eBay to GameStop: ‘Nice try, but no.’ $56 billion from the much smaller company with shaky financing? Bold strategy Cotton, let’s see if it pays off. Classic GME chaos continues 😂
English
1
0
1
136
Reuters
Reuters@Reuters·
EBay rejected a $56 billion takeover bid from the much smaller GameStop over financing doubts, calling the proposal ‘neither credible nor attractive’ reut.rs/4nnuds6
English
8
10
32
27.1K
Connor
Connor@Conguy9·
@ryancohen Gme holders don’t believe anymore Ryan. Please just give us some value man.
English
9
1
55
3.1K
Man in the Mirror retweetledi
Ryan Cohen
Ryan Cohen@ryancohen·
🎯
Paul Branham@BoilerPaulie

Allow me to translate this letter from eBay for those who don’t speak legalese: Ryan, We got your unsolicited offer to buy eBay for $125/share (half cash, half stock) supported by your 5% economic interest in eBay. Our board, backed by the usual crew of bankers and lawyers who get paid either way, “thoroughly reviewed” it. We’re rejecting it. Not because the math doesn’t work. Not because the highly confident letter from TD Securities for up to $20B on top of your $9B+ cash pile is fake. None of that. We’re rejecting it because your entire approach to running a company is an existential threat to how we like to operate here. Here are the reasons we feel this way, and the things we considered before paying consultants to write this: 1) We’d rather keep milking eBay as a “standalone” cash cow than let you turn it into something bigger and better. 2) Sure, you’ve got real financing lined up and you “know people” with deep pockets, but we’re going to call it “uncertain” anyway so we don’t have to engage. 3) Your plan would actually force real long-term growth and profitability changes we’d rather not be held accountable for. 4) The debt we pretended you can’t even obtain, the operational integration and focus on seller satisfaction, and most importantly, putting someone like you in charge of the combined entity all sound like a nightmare for our current leadership structure because all of us would have zero job security. 5) The valuation math only looks bad if you ignore the 46% premium you’re offering our shareholders and the upside from fixing eBay the way you fixed GameStop, which we are choosing to do and hoping nobody notices. 6) And I hope we buried the lede far enough here: Your governance and executive incentives are completely incompatible with ours. You and your board take zero cash, no salary, no bonuses, no golden parachutes. You buy shares with your own money and only get paid if shareholders win. We, on the other hand, like our nice, reliable annual payouts regardless of whether the stock is flat or the company is just coasting. We’re not about to hand over our golden goose to a guy who eats only what he kills. Look, eBay is “strong” and “resilient” in the way every entrenched public company says it is while handing out eight-figure checks and perks to the C-suite. We’ve done the usual incremental stuff: tweaked the marketplace a bit, returned some capital, and we’d like to keep doing that without any cowboy from GameStop coming in and demanding actual skin-in-the-game accountability. Can you just leave us alone? Our team remains focused on protecting the current regime and delivering “value”… mostly to ourselves and our consultants. Thanks, but no thanks, Paul S. Pressler
Chairman of the Board, eBay
(And proud beneficiary of the status quo)

ART
513
1.4K
8.2K
510K
Man in the Mirror retweetledi
Goatbeardz
Goatbeardz@GoatBeardzDD·
Anyone notice Ryan Cohen removed GameStop from his bio? Why would a CEO distance himself from the company he runs? “I never wanted to be the CEO of GameStop.” Unless he’s not going to be CEO of GameStop much longer. Not because he’s leaving. Because GameStop won’t be the parent company much longer. Delaware 251(g) allows a board to reorganize into a holding company without a shareholder vote. All they need is enough authorized shares to execute the exchange. The proxy asks for 2.5 billion shares. His comp is tied to $100 billion market cap. GameStop’s market cap is $10 billion. The comp doesn’t make sense for a video game retailer. It makes sense for the parent company that GameStop sits inside. He didn’t remove GameStop from his bio because he’s leaving GameStop. He removed it because $GME is about to become a subsidiary of TEDDY.
English
39
51
631
38.2K
Man in the Mirror retweetledi
Paul Branham
Paul Branham@BoilerPaulie·
Allow me to translate this letter from eBay for those who don’t speak legalese: Ryan, We got your unsolicited offer to buy eBay for $125/share (half cash, half stock) supported by your 5% economic interest in eBay. Our board, backed by the usual crew of bankers and lawyers who get paid either way, “thoroughly reviewed” it. We’re rejecting it. Not because the math doesn’t work. Not because the highly confident letter from TD Securities for up to $20B on top of your $9B+ cash pile is fake. None of that. We’re rejecting it because your entire approach to running a company is an existential threat to how we like to operate here. Here are the reasons we feel this way, and the things we considered before paying consultants to write this: 1) We’d rather keep milking eBay as a “standalone” cash cow than let you turn it into something bigger and better. 2) Sure, you’ve got real financing lined up and you “know people” with deep pockets, but we’re going to call it “uncertain” anyway so we don’t have to engage. 3) Your plan would actually force real long-term growth and profitability changes we’d rather not be held accountable for. 4) The debt we pretended you can’t even obtain, the operational integration and focus on seller satisfaction, and most importantly, putting someone like you in charge of the combined entity all sound like a nightmare for our current leadership structure because all of us would have zero job security. 5) The valuation math only looks bad if you ignore the 46% premium you’re offering our shareholders and the upside from fixing eBay the way you fixed GameStop, which we are choosing to do and hoping nobody notices. 6) And I hope we buried the lede far enough here: Your governance and executive incentives are completely incompatible with ours. You and your board take zero cash, no salary, no bonuses, no golden parachutes. You buy shares with your own money and only get paid if shareholders win. We, on the other hand, like our nice, reliable annual payouts regardless of whether the stock is flat or the company is just coasting. We’re not about to hand over our golden goose to a guy who eats only what he kills. Look, eBay is “strong” and “resilient” in the way every entrenched public company says it is while handing out eight-figure checks and perks to the C-suite. We’ve done the usual incremental stuff: tweaked the marketplace a bit, returned some capital, and we’d like to keep doing that without any cowboy from GameStop coming in and demanding actual skin-in-the-game accountability. Can you just leave us alone? Our team remains focused on protecting the current regime and delivering “value”… mostly to ourselves and our consultants. Thanks, but no thanks, Paul S. Pressler
Chairman of the Board, eBay
(And proud beneficiary of the status quo)
Paul Branham tweet media
English
266
937
5.2K
691.6K
Man in the Mirror retweetledi
Salvatore Linteum
Salvatore Linteum@PhantomBlack699·
Joele Frank, the firm that eBay liased with to reject Ryan Cohen's offer also assisted Robinhood after the $GME events of January 2021. Joele Frank were also advisors for GameStop in 2019 to block an activist venture with Hestia. It's about to get hostile.
Salvatore Linteum tweet media
English
11
73
491
18.3K
Man in the Mirror
Man in the Mirror@RCMarioKart·
@StockMKTNewz Correct translation. Hi Ryan, we,the eBay Board of Directorsdon't actually have to do much; we simply manage operations now, & for that, we receive a handsome salary & stock compensation. We don't have to buy shares with our own money. Could you please just leave us alone now?
English
0
0
1
62
Evan
Evan@StockMKTNewz·
$EBAY said today that it has rejected GameStop's $GME $56 Bid to takeover the company - WSJ eBay said: “We have concluded that your proposal is neither credible nor attractive.”
Evan tweet media
English
34
20
222
31.6K
Man in the Mirror
Man in the Mirror@RCMarioKart·
@CNBC Correct translation. Hi Ryan, we,the eBay Board of Directorsdon't actually have to do much; we simply manage operations now, & for that, we receive a handsome salary & stock compensation. We don't have to buy shares with our own money. Could you please just leave us alone now?
English
0
0
0
29
Man in the Mirror
Man in the Mirror@RCMarioKart·
@ReesePolitics Correct translation. Hi Ryan, we,the eBay Board of Directorsdon't actually have to do much; we simply manage operations now, & for that, we receive a handsome salary & stock compensation. We don't have to buy shares with our own money. Could you please just leave us alone now?
English
0
0
0
140
Reese Politics
Reese Politics@ReesePolitics·
eBay listed six reasons for declining GameStop's $55.5B proposal, most notably no. 6 essentially being Ryan Cohen's aversion to bloated executive compensation structures. That's telling. $GME
Reese Politics tweet media
English
82
92
1.1K
56.2K
Man in the Mirror
Man in the Mirror@RCMarioKart·
@nytimes Correct translation. Hi Ryan, we,the eBay Board of Directorsdon't actually have to do much; we simply manage operations now, & for that, we receive a handsome salary & stock compensation. We don't have to buy shares with our own money. Could you please just leave us alone now?
English
0
0
1
36
The New York Times
The New York Times@nytimes·
Breaking news: EBay rejected a $55 billion takeover proposal from GameStop, describing the offer as “neither credible nor attractive." nyti.ms/4ntOE6W
English
130
196
1.1K
607.3K
Man in the Mirror
Man in the Mirror@RCMarioKart·
@KobeissiLetter Correct translation. Hi Ryan, we,the eBay Board of Directorsdon't actually have to do much; we simply manage operations now, & for that, we receive a handsome salary & stock compensation. We don't have to buy shares with our own money. Could you please just leave us alone now?
English
0
0
3
61
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: eBay has rejected GameStop’s, $GME, $56 billion acquisition offer and called it “neither credible nor attractive.”
English
280
311
4.7K
820.4K
Man in the Mirror retweetledi
Deep Psychology
Deep Psychology@DeepPsycho_HQ·
“When you can’t be controlled, you will be hated, and that’s the power”. - Nikola Tesla
Deep Psychology tweet media
English
68
730
3.1K
82.1K