CRELurker

1.8K posts

CRELurker banner
CRELurker

CRELurker

@RELurker

15+ years in CRE Developement. Over $200m in completed office/retail projects with a focus on Single Tenant Build To Suit Development.

Texas, USA Katılım Mart 2023
357 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
cinesthetic.
cinesthetic.@TheCinesthetic·
Happy 74th birthday to Steven Seagal!
English
8
10
72
12.2K
Shawn Gorham
Shawn Gorham@shawngorham·
Is Trump going to backdown in the next 90 minutes? Or are we escalating?
English
38
1
46
32.7K
Nick Huber
Nick Huber@sweatystartup·
@shawngorham I think a deal is done. The new standard for how wars are fought. Instead of sending jet airliners full of cash to terrorists we disable them quickly and move on.
English
33
7
274
22.2K
CRELurker
CRELurker@RELurker·
@shawngorham Explain the reflectors on the moon that can be hit with lasers from earth? How did they get there? Please look it up before responding.
English
0
0
2
40
Shawn Gorham
Shawn Gorham@shawngorham·
Wait... did we really land on the moon? My siblings were going down a conspiracy theory rabbit hole at brunch... must say they were making compelling arguments we never landed on the moon. So... did we really land on the moon?
English
102
0
78
64.7K
CRELurker
CRELurker@RELurker·
@Timodc Yep. I could easily be talked into a strategic operation to dismantle Iran’s military capability… the regime is objectively evil. But these simply are not serious people. I honestly hope there’s a good outcome, but hard to see how we’re not worse off when/if this winds down.
English
0
0
2
411
Tim Miller
Tim Miller@Timodc·
Another way to look at it: even the OG necons think this is a total clusterfuck and the costs/risks geopolitically and economically swamp the value of those objectives from the US perspective.
Gummi@gummibear737

I listened to this interview and it's like we're living in separate realities 1) These are OG neocons and they sound exactly like Cenk and Tucker 2) They don't acknowledge the actual objectives (nukes/ICBM) 3) They judge the war on their invented criteria 4) Nonstop doomerism

English
17
22
332
96.3K
CRELurker
CRELurker@RELurker·
@CharmedHerring @Timodc @AGHamilton29 @sasimons Should be easy to be stand on principles without being thirsty for the approval of cranks with abhorrent positions. If young voters are vibing with awful streamers because they go out on a limb saying “war bad!”… engage with them on merits. Williamson was thirsty for Fuentes.
English
0
0
2
11
Charmed Herring
Charmed Herring@CharmedHerring·
@Timodc @AGHamilton29 @sasimons I’m still confused why we are learning the very hard-learned lesson from Kevin Williamson’s attempted olive branch to Nick Fuentes. That’s what this looks like. You had nothing good to say about that - nor should you have.
English
1
0
0
140
Tim Miller
Tim Miller@Timodc·
Is this complete lunacy and light bigotry? Yes! Is it better that the nutbags are so despondent over Trump’s disastrous presidency that they just want a normal Democrat now? Also yes! come on in 🎪 via @sasimons
Tim Miller tweet media
English
37
29
297
51K
Chris Hatch
Chris Hatch@Dirtdog·
Lake Powell Dog Honestly a boat thru could crush. Liquor, burgers or coffee though?
Chris Hatch tweet media
English
2
0
14
1.9K
Sonny Bunch
Sonny Bunch@SonnyBunch·
@Timodc Look if the neocon Never Trump film critic doesn’t understand how to build a coalition wait hold on
English
2
1
46
2.5K
Jonah Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg@JonahDispatch·
Sorry, Ari. I just saw your response. I think it is hilarious that rather than actually respond to my point, you simply opted to double down on your practice of carrying water for Trump like a modern-day Gunga Din. I think it's great that NATO is spending more on defense. I think Trump can be commended for encouraging it (though the turd-polishing of some folks on this front is often embarrassing. He primarily didn't do it to "save" NATO or even to make it stronger). But all of this is irrelevant to the point you dodged. If you think Trump has handled the transatlantic alliance well since being elected to his second term, say so. Own it. Don't deflect. But if that is your position, that's pure idiocy or dishonest spin. Our NATO allies *should* step up. It would be in their interest. But Trump has made the politics of that near-impossible by threatening Greenland, claiming that our allies didn't really fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, (not Vance's Munich performance, dicking around with Ukraine) etc. Even the far right (outside of Hungary) parties hate Trump now. Then, when Trump launched this war on Iran he said he didn't need any of their help because we already won. Now, he's asking for help, but he can't concede error or even ask nicely. So he implies their all cowards who need to muster "delayed courage." Defend that Ari. Hell simply acknowledge it.
Ari Fleischer@AriFleischer

Sorry Jonah. I actually sat in the room for the first half of the movie. For 24 polite years, Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama diplomatically asked NATO members to increase defense spending. For 24 years, it was one excuse after another, all focused in Western Europe on how they wish they could spend more, but their social welfare spending priorities wouldn’t let them. In other words, you the US will spend on defense and protect us. Along comes rude Donald Trump. Finally, someone made clear that if Europe kept freeloading the US was done. It took a bill in the China shop to move Europe. Diplomacy failed. Trump prevailed. That’s reality whether you or I like it. NATO self-withered after 75 years. If Spain, England, Italy and France won’t spend what’s necessary to have a real military, it’s time for something new.

English
320
456
3.6K
754.9K
CRELurker
CRELurker@RELurker·
@SykesCharlie @Timodc trying is correct about Ossoff not spending energy on purity test… but @SarahLongwell25 is obviously correct on overall strategy. Trying to reach youngsters intrigued by fringe is worthwhile but cozying up to freaks is unnecessary and counterproductive. Feels simple.
English
4
0
3
183
CRELurker
CRELurker@RELurker·
@Timodc Quite gross and unhinged by J Pod. I do think you’re too in the weeds on the topic di jour… completely see what you’re trying to say re Ossoff, but the derivative conversation is ridiculous.
English
0
0
5
504
Tim Miller
Tim Miller@Timodc·
There would be a discourse about whether it’s ok to have John Podhoretz in the tent but nobody seems to want an unhinged loon shouting MURDERER at anyone who objects to a single action of Israel’s government or causes a slight delay in the Schnippers doordash order.
English
53
28
1K
32.6K
CRELurker
CRELurker@RELurker·
@shawngorham Bentonville definitely being slept on. Headed there this summer with family… Arkansas is gorgeous
English
0
0
4
118
Shawn Gorham
Shawn Gorham@shawngorham·
A cycling friend has been in Bentonville all week riding bikes - he has raved about it Are we sleeping on Bentonville?
English
136
0
152
36.3K
John Podhoretz
John Podhoretz@jpodhoretz·
The actual Best Picture of 2025 is EDDINGTON. The best nominee is MARTY SUPREME.
English
12
5
80
11.7K
Sonny Bunch
Sonny Bunch@SonnyBunch·
I saw PROJECT HAIL MARY yesterday and I don't think I've ever seen a more crowdpleasing picture in my life. It's going to kill with audiences. Just nailed every emotional and comic beat it wanted to hit. Perfectly Spielbergian pop cinema.
English
98
165
4.4K
543.9K
Chris Armstrong
Chris Armstrong@MrCArmstrong·
I'm a Texan, and I don't eat any of this junk. I'm also not aware of anyone else who does—the closest I've ever heard of as a signature Texan breakfast is Texas toast, and even then, I don't know anyone who eats it. Texas is a big state, so it's easy to overgeneralize, but this? Tell me steak, BBQ, or Whataburger are Texan, and then I'll believe you.
English
1.3K
8
198
1.8M
Financial Dystopia
Financial Dystopia@financedystop·
This guy is shocked by a Texas breakfast, basically a hot dog and cheese stuffed inside sweet bread.
English
438
43
1.1K
451K
Jon Stokes
Jon Stokes@jon_stokes·
It's wild but I have never in my life even once heard something like, "He's a conservative Republican who is anti-abortion and wants to put the Ten Commandments in schools, but he can talk to extremely liberal Democrats credibly." No one would say that because it's obviously stupid. But somehow the reverse comes around like clockwork every cycle. Whoever said that the left has no basic theory of mind for the right -- just an utter inability to put themselves in the other side's shoes -- is spot on.
English
12
46
414
29.7K
Brian Rosenwald
Brian Rosenwald@brianros1·
That’s false imho. The benefit of Talerico isn’t that he codes conservatives it’s that he can talk about faith credibly-which a lot of us Democrats can’t do-and also that he went on Joe Rogan & impressed a guy who is where a lot of less political people are, esp. younger ones
Megan McArdle@asymmetricinfo

Educated Dems keep falling in love with candidates--Kerry, Walz, Talarico--whose bios code conservative-friendly *to educated Dems*. They cannot see distinctions that are extremely visible to the folks they're trying to appeal to, or even imagine such distinctions exist.

English
31
2
28
21.6K
cinesthetic.
cinesthetic.@TheCinesthetic·
What is a movie that you've seen hundreds of times but still enjoy watching it?
English
517
20
293
2.4M
CRELurker
CRELurker@RELurker·
Wait… Tariffs are illegal!?
English
0
0
0
66