Dernnarg2

"The Next Bottleneck After HBM Is HBF"... A Computing Pioneer's Prediction "I have been consistently paying close attention to High Bandwidth Flash (HBF). I'm also collaborating with semiconductor companies on this. HBF is highly likely to stand at the center of the next bottleneck — a surge in demand." David Patterson, professor at UC Berkeley, Turing Award laureate, and widely recognized as the architect of RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing — an approach that simplifies instructions to improve processing efficiency), made these remarks on April 30 (local time) when he met with reporters in San Francisco immediately after delivering a keynote at the Dreamy Next event. Asked about what comes after HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), which is currently in a supply-constrained bottleneck, Professor Patterson answered that HBF will emerge as the next focus. Specifically, he said, "Although a number of technical challenges still remain, the HBF being developed by companies such as SK hynix and SanDisk is a meaningful alternative in that it can deliver large capacity with low power consumption," adding, "Going forward, how efficiently data can be stored and delivered will become the critical variable." This past March, SK hynix announced that it had joined hands with U.S. flash memory company SanDisk to drive the global standardization of HBF. Unlike HBM, which stacks DRAM, HBF is built by stacking NAND flash — a non-volatile memory. Their roles are also distinct. While HBM serves as a fast computation aid, HBF is focused on storing the vast amounts of data that AI processes at high capacity. HBF is drawing attention as the AI inference market grows. The AI market is broadly divided into learning (training) and inference. Training is the process of feeding massive amounts of data to teach an AI model. Inference is the stage in which results are derived based on the trained data. In inference AI, the ability to continuously store and retrieve vast amounts of intermediate data — such as prior conversations, judgment outcomes, and task context — is crucial. This is because AI carries out reasoning by remembering context and building upon it. The problem is that all of this data is difficult to fit into HBM. Since HBM is optimized for handling data used immediately, its capacity itself is inherently limited. Moreover, given its high price, processing the enormous amounts of context data generated during inference using HBM alone would impose significant cost burdens. As a result, an environment has formed in which both HBM and HBF are needed simultaneously — a kind of division of labor. Domestic experts in Korea also anticipate that the importance of HBF will grow going forward. At an HBF research and technology development strategy briefing held this past February, Kim Jung-ho, professor in the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering at KAIST, stated, "If the central processing unit (CPU) was the core in the PC era and low-power technology was the core in the smartphone era, memory will be the core of the AI era," adding, "What determines speed is HBM, and what determines capacity is HBF." He further predicted, "From 2038 onward, demand for HBF will surpass that of HBM."

I’m convinced that the people who charge $200 or $2000 just to see their stock picks. Do so just because their ideas aren’t good enough. Otherwise they would just go long on them with their own capital and retire. This is why they get mad when they see others sharing better ideas for free.

Everyone was doomposting $EWY 2 months ago. Calling it “Silver Crash” or “KOSPI crash bubble” Now they’re all flip flopping opinions, saying they were bullish memory all along. Even despite fear posting from $RPI to $SIVE, my thesis ends up right. Main reason I got 245K+ followers is because I’m consistently right about my opinions while taking a firm directional stance. My $EWY longs are now up ~3x.