RKWyvern

1.9K posts

RKWyvern banner
RKWyvern

RKWyvern

@RKDragon101

Katılım Kasım 2025
63 Takip Edilen37 Takipçiler
RKWyvern
RKWyvern@RKDragon101·
@grok @elonmusk I got a green camo. Urban camo is white black and grey. I would have been happy with just the barrel sticking out above my shoulder with a sling. That was after about 15 tries and I gave up
English
0
0
0
3
RKWyvern
RKWyvern@RKDragon101·
@grok @elonmusk Simple 67 year old white male. Brown slightly greying hair, Urban Camo clothing, Black Tactical gear, holding a BMG .50 Cal style rifle.
English
1
0
0
7
RKWyvern
RKWyvern@RKDragon101·
@elonmusk @elonmusk @grok Yea but it wont generate a photo with a gun in it. I got emotional with it and it finally made a gun, it had 2 triggers, the butt stock was coming out of the body, no end of the barrel it just faded out. I just wanted a simple avatar.
English
1
0
4
365
TH33ORACL3 𝕏
TH33ORACL3 𝕏@TH33ORACL3·
@veggie_eric Grok 4.5 is so freaking good it’s actually ridiculous. The fact that this is available on the free tier is wild.
English
1
0
1
693
RKWyvern
RKWyvern@RKDragon101·
@Deivid11 @veggie_eric I feel like getting rid of my blue checkmark because of hitting the "over use" wall "upgrade or wait 58 minutes" on Grok! I don't need a blue check, I thought Grok would come with it tho.
English
0
0
0
21
David Alcalá
David Alcalá@Deivid11·
@veggie_eric The free limits are really short, so I don’t feel encouraged to pay for an X subscription :(
English
1
0
2
1.3K
RKWyvern retweetledi
Bongino Report
Bongino Report@BonginoReport·
A life gets saved on camera. Heroes really do walk among us 🙏 "To the [first responders] out there... You will always have a home on this show. We love you guys." – @dbongino
English
23
183
1.2K
61.8K
RKWyvern retweetledi
Savanah Hernandez
Savanah Hernandez@Savsays·
If Candace Owens really cared about this case or what happened to Charlie, she would have been at the preliminary hearing taking in every facial expression, testimony, video and exhibit. But she wasn’t, because she doesn’t care. She took a vacation instead. And don’t give me the bullshit, “well she has kids!” Okay, she can’t take one week away from her kids for her “best friend” who she’s made millions off of pretending to care about? She’s not at the preliminary trial because she doesn’t care to see the evidence presented for one of the most high profile cases in American history. She’s a fraud who talks a big game online but won’t actually show up to make her case.
English
1.4K
1.3K
10.9K
245.6K
RKWyvern retweetledi
Benny Johnson
Benny Johnson@bennyjohnson·
The Charlie Kirk trial is Doomsday for Retards… How about this: if you’re so unconvinced that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie, please present your evidence here, right now that refutes the prosecution’s case. Surely there is something. Here’s your chance! Let’s see what ya got…
English
2.6K
774
6.2K
358.7K
RKWyvern
RKWyvern@RKDragon101·
@catturd2 Yes she needs to be shut down. Sick woman. Funny that about 90% of the conspiracy theories from the Covid era and 2020 came to be true. Butt!!!! Not one of her theories has yet to have any truth to them. Come on, "some strange plane from Egypt did it"?
English
1
0
2
234
RKWyvern retweetledi
RKWyvern retweetledi
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱
The Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment – the real antidote to Rousseau and Voltaire The French Enlightenment and the Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment happened simultaneously, in the same century, reading the same books, arguing about the same questions. They reached completely opposite conclusions. One produced the Declaration of Independence and the American Constitution. The other produced the guillotine. This is the most important civilizational fork in modern history. 1. The French Enlightenment begins with the assumption that human beings can be improved by reason – that if you strip away the corrupting institutions of Church, tradition, and inherited authority, the natural goodness underneath will organize itself into a just society. This sounds like progress. It is a fantasy with a body count. Every attempt to implement it has required, at some point, a Committee of Public Safety to handle the people who turned out not to be naturally good enough. 2. The Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment begins with the opposite assumption: human beings are what they are, not what they could be if properly enlightened. Hume grounds morality in human nature as it actually operates – sympathy, habit, sentiment, the slow accumulation of social trust. Smith shows that self-interest, properly channeled, produces collective benefit without a planner. Neither man is building a utopia. Both are building with the actual material available. 3. Burke is the direct refutation, written in real time. He published Reflections on the Revolution in France in 1790 – before the Terror, predicting it precisely – because he understood that institutions are not obstacles to human flourishing, they are its precondition. They contain accumulated wisdom — the knowledge of the dead — that cannot be recovered once destroyed. Pull society apart to improve it and you don’t get the General Will. You get Robespierre. 4. The American founders read Burke, Hume, Smith, and Montesquieu – the Frenchman who looked at England and understood what France was missing. They built a system that takes human nature as given — self-interested, power-hungry, tribal — and constructs institutions to contain those tendencies rather than assume they disappear once the right people are in charge. Checks and balances are not a design flaw. They are what you build when you don’t believe in philosopher-kings. 5. 1776 versus 1789. Same Enlightenment, same century, same vocabulary of liberty and reason. One produces a constitutional republic that has survived two and a half centuries of stress, civil war, and upheaval. The other produces, in sequence: the Terror, Napoleon, 1848, the Commune, and eventually — via Marx, who was a Frenchman in spirit if not in birth — the entire catastrophe of the twentieth century. The difference was not intelligence or intention. It was the starting assumption about human nature. Get that wrong and everything that follows is wrong with it. 6. The guillotine is not the Revolution’s failure. It is its logical conclusion. If man is naturally good and the system is corrupt, then whoever seizes the system in the name of natural goodness is licensed to do anything. The General Will cannot be wrong. Those who resist it are not opponents – they are enemies of nature itself. 7. The real antidote to Rousseau and Voltaire was never a better French philosopher. It was a different civilizational tradition – one that builds with human beings as they are; that treats inherited institutions as repositories of wisdom rather than obstacles to progress; that distributes power rather than concentrating it in whoever currently claims to know the General Will. That tradition was built in Edinburgh, London, and Philadelphia. It is currently under sustained assault — from exactly the same ideas, in exactly the same form, with exactly the same confidence — that Burke watched demolish France in 1789. He was right then. He is right now.
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 tweet media
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱@Kristof_Poland

Voltaire – the fake antidote to Rousseau He is the most entertaining man of the eighteenth century and the most seductive trap in Western intellectual history. He seems like the cure for Rousseau. He is the other half of the disease. 1. Where Rousseau is emotional, Voltaire is rational. Where Rousseau weeps over the noble savage, Voltaire mocks. He is the master of devastating wit, precise irony, surgical ridicule. Candide dismantles every naive optimism in ninety pages with the efficiency of a guillotine – which is fitting, since the guillotine is partly what his work made possible. 2. His great weapon is mockery. Écrasez l’infâme – crush the infamous, meaning the Church, tradition, inherited authority. He crushed it. With wit, elegance, and devastating precision. He was right that the Church was corrupt, that the aristocracy was parasitic, that the old order was indefensible in many of its particulars. Being right about what to demolish is not the same as knowing what to build. 3. Voltaire is the demolition crew without an architecture firm. He tears down, magnificently. He offers no replacement – only rubble, and the advice to cultivate your garden. Private. Disengaged. The conclusion of Candide: after every horror, every injustice, every system failure – grow vegetables. This is not wisdom. This is elegant surrender dressed as philosophy. 4. His irony is a solvent. It dissolves corruption, yes – but it dissolves everything, including the things worth keeping. A civilization marinated in Voltairean irony learns to mock every claim to authority, every appeal to tradition, every invocation of duty. This feels like freedom. It is actually vulnerability – a society that has learned to be ironic about everything is defenseless against the person who believes something earnestly enough to act on it. Robespierre was not ironic. He was a true believer. He won. 5. Rousseau gave the revolutionary the emotional fuel: the pure victim, the corrupt oppressor, the righteous rage of nature against civilization. Voltaire provided the intellectual solvent: he dissolved the legitimacy of every institution that might have contained that rage. Together they cleared the ground completely. Robespierre arrived and found no Church, no tradition, no inherited authority with enough credibility to resist him. He simply moved into the vacuum and filled it with the General Will and the guillotine. 6. And when he wasn’t playing "champion of liberty", he was on the payroll of kings, literally. He spent years at Frederick the Great’s court and corresponded adoringly with Catherine the Great, flattering both in print as enlightened monarchs of the age. While he was writing these letters, Frederick and Catherine were carving up Poland – dismembering a European nation, erasing it from the map and subjugating an entire people in one of the great crimes of the eighteenth century. Voltaire knew. He didn’t care. Écrasez l’infâme — crush the infamous — unless the infamous is paying well and lives in a palace in Berlin or St. Petersburg. 7. The contemporary Voltaire is everywhere: the late night host who dismantles everything with devastating wit and proposes nothing. The enlightened cynic who sees through every institution, trusts nothing, builds nothing, and considers this sophistication – while cashing checks from the very system he mocks. The fake antidote doesn’t kill you. It leaves you without defenses when the real disease arrives. Rousseau is the fire. Voltaire is the man who dismantled your fireplace and called it progress – and then went to warm himself at the tsar’s. Together they produced the French Revolution, with the Terror, and the template for every ideological catastrophe that followed. The most dangerous intellectual partnership in Western history wasn’t a conspiracy. It was two men who despised each other and destroyed the same thing from opposite ends, leaving the ground perfectly prepared for those who came after them with a plan.

English
406
1.9K
5.4K
1.2M
RKWyvern retweetledi
James O'Keefe
James O'Keefe@JamesOKeefeIII·
The US Government needs to pay Nick Shirley for doing a service of saving the taxpayers money. We need to incentivize this type of reporting so the revenue is coming from the outcome. Right now the incentive is to do the fraud, there are too many liabilities in stopping it.
English
1.4K
10.5K
67.3K
617.6K
RKWyvern
RKWyvern@RKDragon101·
Excellent idea!
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy

@JamesOKeefeIII @marietweetss The FBI will pay someone money for turning in a criminal. Why doesn’t the government pay people for exposing fraud? Would help eliminate fraud if the co workers of the fraudsters knew they would be protected and rewarded for exposing the scheme.

English
0
0
0
3