Sabitlenmiş Tweet
ROSS
5.2K posts
ROSS
@ROSSIntel
The Future of Legal Research, Powered By AI.
San Francisco, CA Katılım Ekim 2014
337 Takip Edilen5.2K Takipçiler
ROSS retweetledi
You are governed by a tremendous amount of law that you have no practical access to.
andrew arruda@andrewarruda
but isn't all caselaw free and available online? (it is not)
English
Now have Thomson Reuters assert market harm by ROSS while their stock currently craters and ROSS ceased business operations 6 years ago because of the litigation. Have TR call ROSS bad names while simultaneously depending on AI models trained on billions of copyrighted documents.
ROSS@ROSSIntel
Now have Thomson Reuters sue ROSS, acquire their competitor Casetext for $650M, realize the IP is useless and become dependent on OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta & Google AI models trained on copyrighted data, pirate libraries and TR competitor data from Dow Jones and the New York Times.
English
Now have Thomson Reuters sue ROSS, acquire their competitor Casetext for $650M, realize the IP is useless and become dependent on OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta & Google AI models trained on copyrighted data, pirate libraries and TR competitor data from Dow Jones and the New York Times.
Bob Ambrogi@bobambrogi
Breaking: Thomson Reuters Sues ROSS Intelligence Claiming Theft Of Proprietary Data lawsitesblog.com/2020/05/thomso… @thomsonreuters @ROSSIntel
English
ROSS retweetledi
but isn't all caselaw free and available online?
(it is not)
GSU@GsuGrinding
@CBHessick Oh man, fun chance to nerd out with me. Berry v. State 105 Ga. 683 (1898). I’d send a link but it’s so old I couldn’t find a Justia link and had to go to Westlaw :)
English
ROSS retweetledi
ROSS retweetledi
“It is improper for ROSS to suggest that the Court in this case needs to resolve the question of whether all AI training for all purposes is fair use or not.” - Appellees @ThomsonReuters Brief
🔗chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/wp-content/upl…
ROSS@ROSSIntel
“Although this case may have differences from generative AI cases, we think this decision [TR v. ROSS] provides a useful framework for how to think about whether a company’s training of its AI is permitted under the fair use doctrine.” - Dale Cendali, @Kirkland_Ellis
English
“If the CCP integrates near-frontier AI systems quicker and more effectively into China’s economy and the CCP security apparatus, and drives global adoption of subsidized, low-cost AI, then it could secure advantages over democracies that overcome an intelligence deficit.” 👀
Anthropic@AnthropicAI
We've published a paper that explains our views on AI competition between the US and China. The US and democratic allies hold the lead in frontier AI today. Read more on what it’ll take to keep that lead: anthropic.com/research/2028-…
English
personally i can’t wait for the return to legaltech. i cannot wait.
Paul Yacoubian@PaulYacoubian
never met a founder that wanted to build in the same category as their first startup, almost always like, "man, i fucking hate that market"
English
29 days until oral arguments in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence, the first AI training case in the United States of America.
ROSS@ROSSIntel
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral argument in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence for June 11, 2026.
English
Helpful visualization by @edleeprof of all the AI copyright & IP lawsuits in the United States of America.
ROSS was the first (orange dot), showing how much of a head start ROSS had in bringing deep learning and neural networks to the law before we were sued by Thomson Reuters.
English
ROSS retweetledi
note: chinese model companies do not face domestic litigation around training AI, and all of their large model companies use all the data they can get, for example, Deepseek:
“we cleaned 860K English and 180K Chinese e-books from Anna’s Archive (Anna’s Archive, 2024)”
Pedro Domingos@pmddomingos
Kiss your freedom goodbye if China wins the AI race.
English
ROSS retweetledi
ROSS retweetledi
the FREE NOTWITHSTANDING in all capital letters was the author’s emphasis, not the choice of @ROSSIntel’s social media account. the author was saying even though ROSS was FREE, ROSS was better than the commercial options BECAUSE IT WAS A DIFFERENT EXPERIENCE (those caps are mine)
ROSS@ROSSIntel
“the key word there, of course, being “commercial” while the ROSS Chrome extension is completely free. I would even argue that, FREE NOTWITHSTANDING, the ROSS experience was more useful to me...” 🔗 blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2020/10/2…
English
ROSS retweetledi
“in 2020, west should have responded to ROSS with innovation. instead, west chose litigation. copyright rewards the former, not the latter.” 🔥
Bob Ambrogi@bobambrogi
Another development in the long-running copyright litigation between @thomsonreuters and @ROSSIntel. The parties have filed supplemental briefs addressing how the 3rd Circuit's recent UpCodes ruling impacts their case. lawnext.com/2026/05/each-s…
English
ROSS retweetledi
“the key word there, of course, being “commercial” while the ROSS Chrome extension is completely free. I would even argue that, FREE NOTWITHSTANDING, the ROSS experience was more useful to me...”
🔗 blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2020/10/2…
English
“I dream of a time where #legaltech enables true access to justice.” - @andrewarruda, 2016
andrew arruda@andrewarruda
In Louisiana, the Poor Lack Legal Defense nyti.ms/1T1ZSwG - I dream of a time where #legaltech enables true access to justice.
English