Ralph
85 posts

Ralph
@RalphJing_
AI, software, internet culture, life notes, and daily thoughts. Stellanova Telegram:
Low Earth Orbit Katılım Temmuz 2024
17 Takip Edilen13 Takipçiler
Ralph retweetledi

This is why half of the “AI Agent” demos online feel fake.
They show one tool call and act like the whole system is solved.
But the real pain is orchestration, context, retries, permissions, and making the final answer not look like garbage.
Chart is not perfect, especially around MCP, but the direction is right.
English
Ralph retweetledi

A lot of people still describe AI Agents as just “LLM + tool calling.”
But once you actually run the workflow, you realize it’s not that simple.
The user query is only the entry point.
Behind it, there’s memory, context retrieval, task decomposition, skill routing, MCP/tool calls, execution, result collection, and final response generation.
I broke the full chain down into 20 steps.

English
Ralph retweetledi

The crazy part isn’t that GPT-5.2 is outdated.
The crazy part is that “outdated” now means six months old.
AI timelines are basically dog years now.
Tibo@thsottiaux
To simplify our Codex compute fleet management, we will be sunsetting GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.3-Codex in Codex on June 2nd when logged in with your ChatGPT account. For free plans, GPT-5.5 will be the default frontier model to build and work with going forward. These models will remain available on our API.
English

+86的号吗包涵了太多的信息了,而且容易风控,何必一直纠结于用这个呢?用一张国外的卡保护隐私不是更好吗?
程序员老熊@xiongchun007
给大家报告一个好消息🎉('ω')🎉 Claude App 已经可以选择 🇨🇳+86 中国手机号了!
中文
Ralph retweetledi

Meta’s AI shift is more interesting than it looks.
People keep asking:
“Will AI replace workers?”
But maybe that’s the wrong question.
Meta reportedly moved thousands of employees into AI-focused teams after major layoffs.
So the real question may be:
What happens when companies don’t just use AI…
but start reorganizing the entire company around it?
AI is not only changing products.
It is changing job titles, teams, budgets, and who still matters inside the company.
Maybe the future of work is not “AI replacing humans.”
Maybe it is humans being reassigned into whatever AI needs next.
That part feels much less comfortable to talk about.
English

AI labs are entering a weird phase.
For years, everyone was asking:
“Who has the best model?”
But that question feels incomplete now.
Because if every frontier lab needs insane compute, insane talent, and insane capital just to stay in the game…
then the real question becomes:
Who can turn intelligence into profit before the cost of intelligence kills them?
Maybe the next AI war won’t be about benchmarks.
Maybe it will be about margins.
And honestly, I’m not sure most people are ready to talk about that part yet.
English

@CrossCheckDev yeah this is the part people underestimate.
the pain is not one big task.
it’s 200 tiny switches between tools all day.
if agents can quietly remove that, people won’t care what we call them.
English

@RalphJing_ The real ROI isn't chatbots, it's eliminating the context switching tax between systems. Most teams are bleeding thousands of hours on connective tissue work that agents could handle silently while everyone chases the flashy demos.
English

I’m not sure the “agent boom” is going to look very cool.
Maybe it’s not some perfect AI coworker with a name and a face.
Maybe it’s just boring stuff getting automated quietly —
tickets, docs, CRM notes, internal reports, code review, all that messy work nobody wants to touch.
Which is kind of funny.
People keep selling agents like they’re new teammates,
but maybe what workers actually want is much simpler:
less annoying software.
not sure. feels like that might be the real market.
English








