Rash Bala
14.6K posts

Rash Bala
@RashBala2
Fully @ManCity. A bit of Real Madrid. Carlos Tevez - Cristiano Ronaldo - Ronaldinho.







Hello Prince Adewale @Maya_leeke , I have been watching your tweets and your attacks on our faith lately on this app. Remember you had once tried to engage me by stalking me, and I used to ignore you. I did that deliberately. For the sake of people who may want to be deceived, let me make some explanations as a rebuttal. Prince Adewale is pushing a surface level narrative about Sharia without understanding how classical Islamic practice works. In Islamic law, the ruling on apostasy was never about someone changing their personal beliefs in the privacy of their bedroom. It was the historical equivalent of high treason. In the early days, Islamic societies were under constant military threat. Leaving the faith almost always meant defecting to the enemy army, leaking state secrets, and taking up arms against your own people. The penalty was for political and military betrayal. Even in the ancient world, religion and the state were tied together. If you lived in the Roman Empire or the Persian Empire and defected to their enemies, the penalty was death. In fact, in our Nigerian law, what happens if a Nigerian citizen renounces their allegiance to the country, crosses over to join an armed insurgency, leaks military intelligence, and starts fighting the Nigerian state? Can Nigeria accept that in the name of freedom of association? No. The constitution defines that as treason, and the penalty is death. The United States and every other nation on earth have severe penalties for treason and armed rebellion. In early Islamic history, the Muslim community was a new state fighting for its survival. So leaving the faith was a public defection to the hostile enemy camp. If it was just about changing religion, we would see a very different history. We have authentic records where people left Islam during the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and they walked away freely. You can read the famous Hadith narrated by Jabir bin Abdullah in Sahih al-Bukhari, found in the Book of Virtues of Madinah. An unnamed Bedouin came to the Prophet (peace be upon him), he openly canceled his pledge of Islam, and walked right out of the city. Nobody touched him. Read that again. You cannot strip away the historical and political context of a law just to push a fearmongering agenda on Twitter. Prince Adewale, Be Warned.



The Quran NEVER Calls Christians “Infidels” – Here’s the Clear Truth Christians are never referred to as infidels in the Holy Quran. Not once. Not a single verse. The “infidels” the Quran actually mentions were the pagan Arabs of Mecca, the very people who turned against the first Muslims and tried to wipe them out in their own city. This wasn’t a global command for war or Muslim domination of the world. It was strictly about self defence in those specific early battles when the Muslims were fighting for survival against betrayal by their own people. Now here’s what changes everything: When the Prophet Muhammad feared for the lives of the very first Muslims, he didn’t send them to another Muslim tribe for safety. Instead, he sent them to Christian Abyssinia (modern-day Ethiopia), where a righteous Christian king, the Najashi, welcomed and protected them. If Islam truly taught hatred or killing of Christians, why would the Prophet send his most vulnerable followers to a Christian kingdom during the most dangerous time in early Islamic history? It simply doesn’t make sense. So the real question we all need to ask is: If the Prophet never hated Christians… where did all this modern-day hatred actually come from?





























