Ravens Flock

The most EDC move ever would be using a 1-2 round pick on a tight end that isn’t as good as Isaiah Likely and have him sit behind Mark Andrews

@Gamergod29 I call Mansoor, and raise you a Jacob Rodriguez.

I might’ve just did sum very nasty

@PolymarketBlitz @grok how much money do they make each year compared to mark andrews list from 1-10

𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝟏𝟎 𝐓𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐒 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐅𝐋 1. Trey McBride 2. Colston Loveland 3. Brock Bowers 4. Harold Fannin Jr. 5. Tucker Kraft 6. George Kittle 7. Tyler Warren 8. Sam LaPorta 9. Kyle Pitts 10. Jake Ferguson

@SdrivenH @AbdulMIsmail @ggreenwald All lies

@RavensFlocker @AbdulMIsmail @ggreenwald Alies??? 🤐

Israel slaughtered 15 aid workers in Gaza, buried their bodies so nobody would know, lied about it, and only got caught because they forget to steal one of the victims' cell phones, and he recorded the entire massacre. Israel also did this:

Put your mock drafts below for the chance for them to be read out on shows throughout the week!

@lockedonravens @koestreicher34

@FBGreatMoments A 6 yard run on 2nd down is the 10th best play?

Ravens top 10 plays of the season 😈

Does Israel have "a right to exist?" The answer is an emphatic NO, and I'll explain why. For starters, the question itself is manipulative and means one of two things: (A) The first is that the question means they want something from you. This is the most common. If you concede that yes, Israel has a right to exist, it will be followed by a list of things they need to actualize that right. If Israel has a right to exist, they need our bombs. They need our tax dollars. They need our national resources. They need our veto power at the U.N. Their so-called "right to exist" will require something from us for the right to be conferred. Notice that Americans never go around asking other nations if we have a right to exist. That's because we're not trying to bilk them out of anything. (B) The second is that the question is asked so that, if we answer in the affirmative, it means we must overlook or excuse whatever horrendous human rights abuse, illegal activity, or immoral action they want to undertake (or already have) - even if it is to the detriment of the United States. This strategy requires Israel to label everything an existential crisis, with Israel's future existence hanging in the balance. Once something becomes existential, then ethics don't matter. If this is an extinction-level event, then it's not the time to worry about the morality of a matter. Kill women and children? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Murder nine civilian non-combatants for every one terrorist? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Double-tap missile targets, killing aid workers? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Ethnic cleansing in Gaza? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Bomb churches? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Target journalists? Yes, because Israel has the right to exist. Blow up oil fields? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Violate international law? Yes, because Israel has a right to exist. Because nothing is as important as existing, it's the perfect Get-Out-Of-Having-a-Conscience Free Card for a Desert War Cult that wants to act however it wants with impunity. But there's another reason the question is illegitimate. It's wrongfully open-ended. It's not a complete question. No nation on Earth has a unilateral "right to exist" without qualification; not even the United States. There's got to be an IF on the end of it. Does Israel have a right to exist...if it requires the rest of the world to live on the brink of WWIII? No. Does Israel have a right to exist if it means bankrupting the United States to guarantee its security? No. Does Israel have the right to exist if it means genocide of its neighbors? No. Does Israel have a right to exist if it's acting in constant violation of international law? No. The moment a nation has an unqualified "right to exist" is the moment it can get away with whatever it wants, behave in a way that's detrimental to every other nation on Earth, and can even demand you help facilitating its existence because, after all, it has a "right" to it. Next, logically, we cannot affirm Israel's unilateral "right to exist" over and against the rights of other nations to exist. God Almighty forbids favoritism. He's not a respecter of persons (the Bible says this three times, each time in reference to Jews), and we're forbidden from showing partiality on account of their alleged genetic ancestry. God hates this. It's a sin. If we affirm Israel's "right to exist, " we must by the same measure affirm the right of Iran to exist. And Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Libya, Lebanon, Jordan, the UAE, Iraq, Syria, et al. And I don't feel like it, do you? Sorry. Step out of line, and you get smoked. That goes for Israel, just like it goes for Iran. Further, Israel most emphatically does NOT have a divine right to exist. The Abrahamic Promise of Genesis 12:3 is about Christ, and the recipients, or heirs of that promise, are Christians exclusively. Those who have faith in Jesus are the “heirs of the promise” (Galatians 3:29). The Seed referenced in the promise is Christ, according to Paul, and he very explicitly says that it’s NOT Jews (Galatians 3:16). There is no Covenant blessing or promise obtainable or retainable outside of Christ (2 Corinthians 2:10). Romans 9 says that Jews who reject Christ do not belong to Israel (Romans 9:6-8). Romans 11 says that Jews who reject Christ have been rejected by God and they’ve been broken off from Abraham (Romans 11:17–20). Whatever the Dispensationalists claim in the novel eschatology about the future, doesn't change the fact that they are - as it stands now - cut off from the promises of God until at such time they stop persisting in unbelief. Israel does not have the right to exist on account of an ancient ancestral land deed. Let's presume for a moment that most Israelis aren't more European than they are Middle Eastern. Let's pretend they're more Semitic than the Palestinians who've lived there continually for thousands of years (they aren't). It wouldn't matter if it were true. That's not how the world works. Americans don't have to give back Florida to the Seminole. My ancestors came from the British Isles, but I don't have the right to Buckingham Palace. The land known as Palestine has been inhabited by dozens and DOZENS of people groups over the millennia. Every nation on Earth has previously been inhabited by different people groups than those who live there now. And that means exactly nothing. And if you want to quote the Bible at this point, refer back to the last one. If we're playing by Biblical rules, Palestine belongs to Christ, which means it should be transferred to those who are in Christ, at which point, the Church would happily take it. And finally, it would be foolish and irresponsible for any serious person to answer "Does Israel have a right to exist" in the affirmative, knowing what the Zionists mean when they say "Israel." In their head, they don't mean the strip of land we call Israel. They mean Greater Israel (which is why they refer to the land held by other nations as Judea, or Samaria, or Greater Israel). Their entire national history has been one ambitious land grab after another. Their goal is to occupy practically the entire Middle East, a region currently home to 310 million Muslims. No, we don't want WWIII, thank you very much. And we're not going to affirm your right to exist there. As Christians, there's a bonus reason we should answer that question in the negative. We should be reminded that the current global consensus is that no Christian ethnostate should exist on this planet. That's out of the question for every major international ruling body on Earth. So in a world in which Christians are not allowed to have a Christian ethnostate, there's no good reason we should support a Jewish one. Jesus Christ is the King of Kings. We should not support the "right to exist" of a nation that rejects Jesus in their national charter, which Israel matter-of-factly does. Their entire identity is founded upon their rejection of Jesus as Lord. They ban Jews who believe in Christ from migrating to Israel. They ban public Christian evangelism. They pull the broadcast licenses of Christian TV and radio if they provide programming directed at evangelizing Jews. They're hostile to the indigenous church. They discriminate against Christian in a thousand different ways, none of them secretly. Any Christian who would support the right of a nation to exist that is THAT hostile to our God needs to get their head on straight. Not only should we not support their right to exist, but newsflash: God Almighty also doesn't, either. He does not embrace a nation that rejects His Son. Reject Christ, reject God (Luke 10:16). Reject God, be rejected by God (2 Chronicles 5:2). Does Israel have a right to exist? The short answer is no. The long answer is noooooooo. It doesn't. That does not mean - for the record - that Jews don't have a right to exist, any more or less than any other human has such a right. But their nation-state? Their body-politic? Their collective civic identity? No, it doesn't. And that's the only answer this side of common sense.

@ant6ni0_ @OG_GoldMouth @HoodieRamey He’s great for what he is. He’s not AB, he’s not a big body, but he’s the best Lamar has had so far

@RavensFlocker @OG_GoldMouth @HoodieRamey So you writing him off?

Just gonna be real lol the only reason people think Zay Flowers isn’t a “WR1” is because he isn’t 6 foot

@ant6ni0_ @OG_GoldMouth @HoodieRamey Zay already had WR1 targets day 1 AB didn’t

@RavensFlocker @OG_GoldMouth @HoodieRamey Ain’t contradict my point my point is we don’t know what Zay gon turn into

@Yuri_Ravens Tried for him in damn near every mock so far

Trey Zuhn would have me feeling a lot better about the state of the ravens offensive line Think he can spot you anywhere and give you plus pass protection. Swing tackle or center. Good emergency if one of our tackles goes down. Definitely would consider him at 80.

@ant6ni0_ @OG_GoldMouth @HoodieRamey Because he wasn’t the teams WR1 at the time and when he was his production took off. Kinda contradicted your point, Zay gets the targets and has decent production but also needs to do a better job with ball security and getting vertical. Has some bad drops but all WRs do

@OG_GoldMouth @HoodieRamey What I mean by takeoff is, become what we know now, we don’t know the trajectory of Zay, he might end up goin crazy especially now that we got a new OC, we was super run heavy vs a pass heavy Pittsburgh box stats aren’t everything

@AbdulMIsmail @ggreenwald These are our “allies”

@ggreenwald ...and just in case anyone hasn't seen the footage, here are the Gaza medics rushing to the scene, not realising that the IDF Golani Brigade, set up an ambush. You can hear the medics being executed, one by one. The IDF buried them (and the ambulance) in a shallow grave.

Walk with me

@ColeJacksonFB D-Hop > Keenan

Keenan Allen would be a pretty fun addition. 84 catches for 802 yards, but big thing was he ranked 11th in the NFL with 51 first downs. His 12 contested catches was t18th. FWIW - Diggs was 9th with 55, but I can't see them going after Diggs. FWIW2 - Hopkins had 11 CTC

“The best mock draft of all time” - they

@ColeJacksonFB Lmfao

I have no idea if I'm just lost on the play design, but the RB doesn't even remotely follow the path... BUT Logan Jones (C #55) showing how damn quickly he can cross face and seal... this kids movement skills are impressive.

@TheDailyRaven Size

Can somebody explain to me why Tyson is the pick at 14 with his injury history and issues with drops?

“This is the best mock draft I’ve ever seen” They said I should take the bald man’s job