Robby

@Thecryptomist You should tackle them head on like a 🐂

Running away from my problems.

@Thecryptomist Have a great Friday hope your feeling better 🙏

Happy Friday loveys!

@Thecryptomist Hope you’re not hurt 🙏 always take precautions too many crazies these days.

@Thecryptomist I do the same too 😂

I will spend 20 minutes browsing Netflix just to watch something I’ve watched before.

@Thecryptomist It ruined everything 😅

Social media killed romance.

@Thecryptomist After the Gym 💪 but yeah so relaxing 😌

Lazy Sundays make the best medication.

@Thecryptomist What’s your insta? I can’t message you on here 😂… maybe your true love has been here you just don’t know it yet 😈

This year I need to get married. I'm tired of being strong.

@Thecryptomist The humanity 😍😍😍

Getting accusations that I sold my account. Sorry my focus is on the world falling apart and not candle sticks 🙄 Some things are more important than tradingview.

@Thecryptomist @MarioNawfal Always got the best comeback 😎

@MarioNawfal I mean they’re charging 2million a ship. I think they will be okay

If the Iranian Regime survives, it will be a long and slow recovery. If they fall, trillions of dollars of investment will flow into the region. This is the reality, whether you like it or not.

@Thecryptomist Hope you feel better 🙏

ill ..again 🤒

@Thecryptomist If the world is ending will my favorite crypto influencer marry me 💍 already haha I kid I kid 😂

WW3 is on the verge, all because rapists, pedophiles and baby eaters have not been arrested.

@Thecryptomist @lady_valor_07 It looked so good in the movie 😂

@lady_valor_07 Miss Trunchball

First word that comes to mind when you see this cake?

@Thecryptomist Good Afternoon Future Wifey 😍

Goood afternoon xx

@Thecryptomist @astronomer_zero What’s is the 100x can you tell me Misty? 😭

@astronomer_zero Rookie numbers! Time to 100x!!

$BTC Account doubled in 1.5 months (5% risk per trade on average) ✅ Here's how I did it (secrets to trading philosophy revealed) Alright, just doubled my account from trading the range so far since start of Feb. And, to many of you, that should be to no surprise, because these trades are all built on the backbone of our macro range masterplan since the very day it started, of calling the bottom in live time (Feb 6), range high, and range low. That range is still holding more than 1 month later. And in alignment, we have simply continued to trade it so far without failure. Many of you have been able to replicate a large part of that success since I share (almost) all of my entries and exits live, telling you exactly when to get in, and when to get out. But regardless, even if you copied all my moves, doesn't necessarily mean you doubled your account. That's exactly why I often get asked how much I exactly make, because there is one parameter I don't often talk about, which is how much I risk per trade in exact sense. And while I don't like to reveal PnL numbers too often to not draw unwanted attention, I can share relative numbers since risk is related to just that, regardless of your size. After all, risk is personal, and should be treated that way. Besides, it's treated as too holy. There is way too much emphasis on having an exact defined risk, and misinterpreted as needing a stoploss in an exact location (market makers love to hunt you), so that you can plan your exact risk and know exactly how fast your account will grow and exactly when you can retire. In reality, trading is quite different, but it's a good kind of different. Because planning retirmenent like that, to any critical mind, is nothing but a pipe dream. So this all leads to revealing a part of my trading philosophy, to help you avoid such traps and continue your journey in the right direction and especially not the wrong direction. Keep in mind, my philosophy is personal, and is often considered an unpopular opinion. It certainly is not for everyone. But if you have been liking my trades, enjoy how they feel and the stress free aspect of it as well as the real (as real as it gets) results they bring, then you're welcome in advance for the sneak peek in my trading philosophy I'm sharing here. #1 Win rate is more important than RR Unpopular opinion number 1 indeed. Because only high RR's look flashy and clean on social media. Only 10 RR+'s seem as if the trader exactly knows what he's doing. And it's very effective for selectively sharing posts too. In reality though, going for 10RR+ trades means no partials at all before hitting 5RR say, which means your trade could run to 6RR, hit all your targets except your most ambitious ones, and still result in a loss. So, even while your edge is working well, you still probably eat many losses before seeing the winning effect of your edge. That gap is frustrating because it means you have to sometimes wait days/weeks (multiple losing trades) before seeing results, which is also detrimental if you want to test a new edge (which may not be an edge in the first place). Instead, partials earlier, reduces your RR, and increases win rate because you already eliminate. If your 6RR or 7RR still hits, then you still take home 3RR or so net, instead of -1RR. This allows for steadier growth, allows you to see pretty quickly if you are doing a good job, the very next 1 or two trades, allows you to steer and adjust quickly, and by principle of risk optimisation, also allows you to risk more, and so your account ends up growing faster. It also allows you to redeploy partials if price retraces locally, and it still keeps you winning even if your final target isn't hit. You have all seen how I pinpoint entries quite exact, but then sometimes we don't get final target, or get front run, but still walk home with the win. Finally, it also allows you to keep runners which increase drastically on big trending moves. Since, if you go for a 10RR+ trade, I assure you once you hit 10RR without having taken much partial, you are very tempted to close all (I mean congrats, you just hit a homerun). But if price runs further, you feel unexposed and so you feel the strongest emotion in trading: FOMO whereas if you keep runners, you still end up with a 50RR plus runner sometimes, getting an average return of 10RR anyways, whilst keeping your high win rate, the irony. Instead leaving runners always keeps you exposed, especially when executed well in alignment with your high timeframe idea. There are some more reasons, but let's keep this post not too lengthy and move on to the second unpopular opinion: #2 Fixed position sizing - variable risk, is better than fixed risk - variable position sizing. Another very unpopular opinion. "No defined risk, no trade", "no SL, no trade", "no invalidation, no trade". The single biggest misunderstanding by far, is that a stop loss is the same as an invalidation. It's not. So instead of telling your broker (crypto exchange) exactly where you force yourself to sell, either directly (with a stoploss order), or, indirectly. Indirectly as in: with a higher position size i.e. telling your broker your stoploss/liquidation is closer, or vice versa, lower position size, telling your broker your stoploss is further away, and yes, the AI is very good at finding your forced selling point nowadays. Instead, using a fixed position size (say always 2x of your account), leaves the broker completely in the unknown. On top, it also allows you to locally monitor on set intervals whether to get in or to get out. Sometimes, you get out beyond analytical invalidation, sometimes, before your analytical invalidation, on average usually around it. And because you use fixed position size, your invalidation width determines risk. Keep that consistent, and so will your risk be approximately. My results So I just laid out my philosophy. You know me, I don't leave it at that, we actually have been calling all these moves step by step, and they have led to these results. Closing 6 wins in a row, but in the graph, a steady increase due to partials and all other elements of my exact philosophy, mostly reaching my final target (about 6-8 RR away from entry/inval), with partials, ending mostly around 2-3RR on average after fees per trade. And with an SL width mostly 1-3.5% wide, and a fixed position size of 2x or 3x leverage (you already know), that results in a variable risk per trade ranging 3 - 8% approx. On average around 5% risk per trade give or take, and with 6 trades closed, 0 losses, 6 wins, that ends up in 1.12^6 = 1.97 x or about a double on the account. Say you have not been risking my amount and say go for 1x on account, then average risk using my method is less, say 2.5%, then you might have ended up with: 1.06^6 = 40% gain in 1.5 months, very good indeed. Even if you missed a trade entirely: 1.05^6 = 34%, still amongst the top 100 traders in the robins cup. Summary So my philosophy, assuming accurate analysis allows you to: ➡️Have way more winners ➡️Have way less losers ➡️Risk more ➡️Allow runners ➡️Stress out less for being front run on your target and still losing ➡️Stress out less about getting close to target 5 times before hitting it on the 6th ➡️Stress out less about micromanaging your trade because the market is volatile ➡️Etc, etc etc. There of course is more to it, but without a doubt, here is a big (the biggest) step on the path towards... the dream of profitable and stress free trading. Enjoy.

@Thecryptomist GM to the one Crypto Queen against injustice 😍

Good morning to everyone who doesn’t support people on the Epstein files x

@Thecryptomist The futher you go down the Rabbit Hole it gets worse 😳

Honestly, America is a whole Netflix series!

@Thecryptomist I’m only bullish for you 😈

Everyone bullish at resistance again 👀

@Thecryptomist Agreed!

We should not have old people as leaders of countries.

@Thecryptomist We are cooked… maybe I should propose to my Crypto GF who doesn’t know me yet 😈

Can’t wait until this war is over and we’re talking about the next doomsday event a week later.

@Thecryptomist @ShardiB2 Agreed! This is so sad on so many levels 😢… people be trying hardcore to flex for others, but don’t take care of their pets smh 🤦‍♂️

@ShardiB2 May god abandon them as they abandoned their pets

This is HORRIBLE