ReadOnly
23.3K posts

ReadOnly
@ReadOnly0137
OctoGen in Nov. Doing lifeline data dump; Ask.






On the question of whether WotC's shift to embracing older fans is genuine or not, it should be noted that many of the truly awful people (Cynthia Williams, Jeremy Crawford) responsible for the "sensivity" regime, and attacks on Gygax, Arneson, and others, are now gone. Dan Ayoub seems to be driving this creative shift, with Cochs' support. I label that support from Cochs as completely mercenary, but Ayoub seems genuine. That being said, right now the damage is done. The 2024 ruleset embeds the terminology shift (“species”), the further decoupling of mechanical traits from species, the identity and sensitivity language, and the overall design philosophy that many classic fans spent a decade objecting to. The art is actively hostile to the majority of D&D's fans. As long as 2024 D&D is the base upon which this pivot is resting, it's going to fail. Ayoub also needs to explicitly disavow and roll back some particularly egregious bit of offense from the past decade to signal WotC's change of heart is genuine. I think removing the Content Warnings from the TSR era books would be an excellent place to start.




















