Carolina

@Truthacabra33 @ClownWorld It’s an Audi. Lol

@ClownWorld I understand why she did it. She spent alot of money and doesn't want some guy in his 97 accord to slam the door into hers. Have you ever had someone slam their door into your car. It sucks and is expensive to fix especially if there's a dent.

Woman parks her Audi like an absolute asshole, taking up extra space on purpose so nobody can park next to her. Then gets mad when someone leaves a note calling her out: “Learn to Park Fuckin Idiot.” She films herself bragging that she did it on purpose and roasting their handwriting. Peak main character syndrome.

@dayoungbulll @jaredhenry95034 @ClayTravis

@RealAppraiserSC @jaredhenry95034 @ClayTravis Homophobic? Yikes

@RealAppraiserSC @jaredhenry95034 @ClayTravis Are you just now learning about Google and copy/paste

@dayoungbulll @jaredhenry95034 @ClayTravis You’re gay bro. The only thing worse than saving shirtless photos of Clay on your phone is searching for shirtless photos of Clay.

@jaredhenry95034 @RealAppraiserSC @ClayTravis I just said i don’t think he’s gay. What would i dig for?

@dayoungbulll @jaredhenry95034 @ClayTravis Uh huh

@dayoungbulll @jaredhenry95034 @ClayTravis You’re the one saving that photo on your phone. Lol

@jaredhenry95034 @ClayTravis Are you insinuating Clay is gay?

Save some chicks for the rest of us, Max.

@neoavatara What do they win?

Any ceasefire that doesn't include the immediate turning over of nuclear materials is an absolute win for the Iranians. Especially after months of ultimatums and deadlines. We all know that, even if some people aren't willing to be honest about it publicly.

@ShawnWrigh43131 @GarbageDudes @naah1929 @varadmehta If you have a $20 bill in your pocket and go to a restaurant, how much can you spend? $20. If you have a credit card in your pocket how much can you spend? As much as you convince yourself you will pay back later.

@GarbageDudes @naah1929 @varadmehta ?

Everyone here saying they don't have credit cards is more or less saying they don't shop online. I have doubts. And questions.

@RobProvince There’s a complete ignorance to how suburbs became suburbs.

If a “starter homes” is close to half a mil you can’t afford the area. It’s just that simple. It’s not that you can’t afford a home. You can’t afford a home…. there. So yeah. You might have to move. You won’t be the first. Things were so bad once we had this thing called the Great migration. You best believe the economy was worse then. This is a slow economy. Hell we haven’t even had a recession yet (since the definition got changed). Those are fun.

See… this is what I’m saying. $400,000?!? Really? You know we can get on Zillow and look up housing prices for starter homes in our area? Right? Like we can see houses at $250,000. Are they in LA? No. Are they starter homes like we grew up in? And our parents. And our grandparents? Yeah. $400,000 is going to be the starting price for houses in my neighborhood and that’s not a “starter” neighborhood my man.

@TrulyCruelly13 @JoelWBerry 40% of American households pay no federal income taxes. It’s not isolated to rich people.

@RealAppraiserSC @JoelWBerry Federal Income Taxes, he did pay for foreign taxes, though. Apparently he doesn't mind having to pay taxes oversea, but not when it comes to his birth country. Also, he paid 0% in income taxes.

A few years ago, I tried to help out a family member who was having trouble, alternating between renting and homelessness. He had a job, and I told him I’d help him with his finances. When we met up, he was wearing a new pair of Jordans. When I delved into his spending, I found he was renting all his furniture, his TV, and a video game system from Rent-A-Center. He ate fast food every day. I explained to him why that was such a bad idea. I told him how I get most of my furniture from Goodwill and garage sales. Told him rich people don’t wear new Jordans. I even showed him how much his money would be worth in 30 years if he invested the money he was giving to Rent-A-Center. His response? “Sorry, I need nice furniture and I need to look good.” These are the people blaming the rich for their problems.

@KillaKreww She wants to control other people’s speech so badly.

Chelsea Handler goes OFF on Tony Hinchcliffe & Shane Gillis for making “racist” jokes at the Kevin Hart Roast and claims White people should NOT be joking about Black people in that kind of way since its equivalent to joking about r-pe 😳 “I knew enough about Tony & Shane… They’re racists, they’re bigots, they’re sexist… I don’t find those jokes funny. L-nching Black people is not a joke. It’s worse than r-pe… Them making fun of Sherryl Underwood’s dead husband who comitted s—cide is gross… I wasn’t fine with that. There was so much disgustingness, I knew it was gonna be a gross vibe.”

@TrulyCruelly13 @JoelWBerry What kind of taxes are you talking about? Estate taxes? Income taxes? Payroll taxes? Capital gains taxes? What?

@RealAppraiserSC @JoelWBerry Seriously? TRUMP was exposed for a lot of that. Why do you think he made it illegal for the IRS to ever be allowed into his finances and his entire family? You think it was because he was just a simple victim? Nope! He has even admitted proudly he's paid very little taxes!

@TrulyCruelly13 @JoelWBerry What kind of taxes do rich people not pay?

@JoelWBerry Actually, if rich people didn't fight the government so hard to avoid paying taxes. Maybe, the middle class would have a chance to become wealth themselves. I'm preferring to those rich people who inherited their millions/billions. Example... Trump hasn't paid much in taxes.

@BigPictureDaily Big Puncture, I bet your missing carpeted bathrooms.

Maybe I missed something, but we are not, and it declared war. The last time I checked, it was an oath to the constitution and not of an oath of loyalty to the president. So excited this is the guy running.

@JTCharles01 @DaireCarragher This looks much better. Retard

@DaireCarragher No. Part of what makes it great is its simplistic nature We don’t need the red white and blue Eve to where Frankly it’s a hideous look

As a non-American, this is just objectively going to be an improvement no?

When Joel Biden was in office, sororities weren’t making these videos because they didn’t feel like dancing But 2025 is a new era, and you can tell from this video released today that they are proud to live in the oldest and greatest country on earth

Yesterday, Donald J. Trump nearly lost his life. An armed gunman waited for him in the bushes. He brought a go-pro camera to record it. A secret service agent spotted the barrel of a gun through a fence and shot at the gunman. The gunman fled. He was caught. And now we slowly learn about him and his motive. President Trump is my running mate, and my friend, but he is more importantly a father and grandfather to people who love him very much. I want him to have many more years with his family. (And selfishly, I'd like many more with my own.) I admire the president for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out of control. It nearly got Steve Scalise and many others killed a few years ago. It nearly got Donald Trump killed twice. But I want to say something about yesterday's news, and how it illuminates the difference between vigorous debate and violent rhetoric. Here is what we know so far: Kamala Harris has said that "Democracy is on the line" in her race against President Trump. The gunman agreed, and used the exact same phrase. He had a Kamala Harris bumper sticker on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's "fight for Democracy" and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia-Ukraine war. HIs name is Ryan Routh, and he donated 19 times to Democrat causes and zero to Republican ones. How do you think the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a 19-time Republican donor tried to kill a Democratic official? It's a question that answers itself. For years, Kamala Harris's campaign surrogates have said things like "Trump has to be eliminated." And how have their media allies responded to the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump in as many months? NBC News called the attempted assassination a "golf club incident." The LA Times told us "Trump Targeted at Golf Club." The USA Today's top of the fold headline is "Hope in America," and they published a preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump "brings these assassination attempts on himself." CNN's Dana Bash--who just yesterday bizarrely accused me of inciting a bomb threat--said today that Harris campaign rhetoric didn't motivate Routh even though he echoed their rhetoric explicitly. PBS's weekend show perfectly illustrates the double standard of Kamala Harris's media friends. After spending 30 seconds on the second assassination attempt on President Trump, they then focused on the real danger: me and President Trump, who are, according to them, personally responsible for bomb threats against Springfield. Of course, I repeatedly condemend those threats. And reports today suggest they came from a foreign country, not--as the media suggested--a deranged Trump fan. The double standard is breathtaking. Donald Trump and I are, by their account, directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why? Because we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us about the problems in their town. Meanwhile, Harris allies call for Trump to be eliminated as the media publishes arguments that he deserved to be shot. This seems like a double standard. But at a deep level, it is entirely consistent. Consider Springfield. Citizens are telling us that there are problems. These include the undeniable truths of higher car accidents, unaffordable housing, evictions of residents, overcrowded hospitals, overstressed schools, and rising rates of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories--which, again, multiple people have spoken about (either on video or to me or my staff). Kamala Harris's first strategy was to ignore these people and their concerns. Yes, she had prevented the deportation of millions of illegal aliens, and some of them made their way to Springfield. But it was a small town with no voice. Some of the local leadership even loved the cheap labor. So the suffering of thousands of American citizens went ignored. Their next move with these stories is censorship. In Springfield, a psychopath (or a foreign government) calls in a bomb threat, so they blame that on President Trump (and me). The threat of violence is disgraceful of course, yet the media seems to relish it. They cover a bomb threat, but not the rise in murders. They cover the threat, but not the HIV uptick. They cover the threat, not the schools overwhelmed with new kids who don't speak English. They cover the threat, not rising insurance rates or the car accidents that caused them. They cover the threat, not the failures of Kamala Harris's leadership. The purpose is not to turn down the rhetoric. If anything, covering the bomb threats gives whoever makes them exactly what he wants: attention. The purpose is distraction and shame. How dare you talk about the problems of Haitian migration in Springfield? You're endangering people, simply by discussing the problems of Kamala Harris's policies. It's a form of moral blackmail, designed not to make anyone safe but to shut everyone up. Springfield is the most recent, but hardly the most egregious example. There was the Hunter Biden laptop story, censored by BigTech. And who can forget that anyone who didn't support Kamala Harris's Ukraine policy was drenched in the blood of Ukrainian children. That last one appears to have had some effect on Routh--the most recent would-be assassin. The message is always the same: don't you dare express an opinion on the public affairs of your nation. The message is: shut up. This is the difference between debate--even aggressive debate--and censorship. It is one thing to attack Kamala Harris for "destroying the country" and quite another to say that President Trump should be "eliminated." It is one thing to criticize overheated rhetoric, and another to say that a former president has invited an assassination on himself. It is one thing to say that Donald J. Trump's arguments about the election of 2020 are wrong; it is another thing to attempt to remove him from the ballot over it. It is one thing to say that pets are not, in fact being eaten, and another thing to say that anyone who disagrees is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous dissent, is a great tradition of the United States. Censorship is not. For the next 7 weeks of this campaign, I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind. I believe you have every right to criticize me and Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue things about us. But when I ask you to "tone down the rhetoric" it's not about being nice--our citizens have every right to be mean, even if I don't like it--or empty platitudes. Instead, I'm asking all of us to reject censorship. Reject the idea that you can control what other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow citizens over silencing them--either through the powers of Big Tech or through moral blackmail. I think this will make our public debate much better. But there's something else. Reject censorship and you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf. The reason is simple. The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one way to permanently silence a human being: put a bullet in his brain.