Pre Cinema History 📷🎞️🇨🇦 🏴
119.1K posts

Pre Cinema History 📷🎞️🇨🇦 🏴
@RealPreCinema
Paul Burns, Pre Cinema Historian, Autodidact. Author, researcher and compiler of THE HISTORY OF THE DISCOVERY OF CINEMATOGRAPHY. I post daily here on X.


Two years after Wheatstone produced his Stereoscope in 1832, Elliot produced his own device permitting two separate images to be viewed as one. Below, a Stereoscopic photograph by James Elliot entitled 'Cora,' c. 1860s. Image the Victoria & Albert Museum. While Elliot conceived of the idea and designed an instrument, Sir Charles Wheatstone is generally credited with inventing the first functioning stereoscope (a mirror stereoscope) and presenting it in 1838. Wheatstone's device was more robust and allowed for experimental work on binocular vision.


1834 THE STEREOSCOPY OF JAMES ELLIOT (1811-1891) It is reported that #JamesElliot, a Scottish teacher of mathematics in #Edinburgh, had the idea of constructing an apparatus to view two dissimilar pictures simultaneously to create the impression of an elevated object around 1834 (Royal Society). This Scot devised the idea of building a contraption that would allow two separate and dissimilar images to be seen side by side, creating the illusion of an object with relief in the same manner as our eyes do. Despite his significant role in the early history of 3D vision, there is no verified portrait of James Elliot currently known to exist in major historical archives or the public record. Unlike his more famous contemporaries, Sir Charles Wheatstone and Sir David Brewster, Elliot was a teacher and professor rather than a public-facing ‘celebrity scientist,’ which likely accounts for the lack of an official portrait.



@RealPreCinema This is absolutely wild!





No trace of the Petit apparatus has been found and in fact of all my sources that should know, they have no mention of this man except for his overshadowing work alongside Edison in attempting to record sound.


The Petit US patent № 560367 for “Apparatus for Exhibiting Successive Photographs,” the projector schematic I am posting about primarily, is here. It had three viewing ports. All seven pages of the patent are here #petit1896" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">precinemahistory.com/chapter-eighte…
in chapter 18.

1896 ADEMOR NAPOLEON PETIT (1866-1914) Petit was a Canadian-born machinist and inventor who became a notable figure in the early Phonograph industry in the United States. He later moved to the US, where he was involved in significant developments in sound recording technology. By 1880, he was living in Chicopee, Hampden County, Massachusetts, as recorded in the US Census. At the age of 14, he was working in a cotton mill, alongside his family members, including his father, R. Leon Petett (or Petit), his mother, Phebe, and siblings. The census lists him as Adamir Petett, perhaps a variation or misspelling of his name. This little man now living in New Jersey applies 7 December 1895 for two patents, an “Apparatus for Exhibiting Successive Photographs,” (No. 614356) and is granted copyrights on 19 May 1896 along with Joseph Livingston who worked with Ottomar Anschutz on the Schnellseher.




Cooper was born in St Albans to a photographer father, who trained him in photography from a young age and began his film career assisting Birt Acres in the 1890s. Between 1896 and 1915 he produced around 300 films (roughly 36 of them animated), often under his own Alpha Trading Company, which he established around 1906 (some sources date the company earlier). He also ran early cinemas in the area and later worked on documentaries, newsreels, and animated advertisements. He is best remembered today for his inventive puppet / stop-motion work with everyday objects like matches and children’s toys. His technique involved painstaking frame-by-frame animation, frequently blending live-action bookends with dream sequences.


IN THE LAND OF NOD [Dreams of Toyland] (1908) Predating Pixar's ‘Toy Story’ (1995) by 88 years, Arthur Melbourne-Cooper (1874–1961) and his Alpha Trading Company developed this absolutely amazing stop-motion sequence of toys coming to life in a dream of a little boy. Mom puts him to bed and then the amazement begins. Runs 7:24 with animation beginning at 2:57.




NO SCROLLING NEEDED Nºs 1-8 All of Hogarth’s eight sequential paintings of 'A Rake’s Progress,' are stitched together here for continuity. I am also curating other sequential series by other artists for publishing here a little later. Stay tuned. Animation HOTDOC.

SEQUENTIAL STORYTELLING IN STORYBOARD FASHION Nº5 Hogarth's work, once made into engravings, was so widely copied as a result of print publishing, that he advocated for the Copyright Act of 1735 to safeguard writers and artists. Nº6 Besides 'A Rake’s Progress,' Hogarth also completed the sequenced ‘A Harlot's Progress’ in 1731 (a series of six sequenced paintings) and ‘Marriage a la Mode’ painted between 1743 and 1745 (also six). Nº7 In a striking piece of sequential storytelling, Hogarth has depicted his characters’ downfall in storyboard fashion, illustrating clumped movement rather than specific motion. Nº8 These original sequenced series of paintings by #WilliamHogarth are held by Sir John Soane's Museum @SoaneMuseum in London soane.org





PAINTINGS BEFORE FRAMES Nº1 'A Rake’s Progress' is a series of 8 sequential paintings by Hogarth between 1732 and 1733. The series depicts the deterioration of #TomRakewell, a Prodigal Son of sorts who never returned home. I present them in the order painted with matched engravings, published in 1735. Nº2 Hogarth painted several sequenced paintings, not just 'A Rake’s Progress' all being noteworthy to pre cinema as they unfold like a storyboard indicating both motion and more importantly, elapsed time within a story-line. Nº3 The canvases were produced between the years 1732 and 1733, and then engraved in 1734 and published in print form in 1735. Nº4 In the mid-18th century, particularly in England, we begin to see some of the first satirical illustrations in print. Such political humour carried on into the early 20th century newspapers, and continued to morph into what we today call #socialmedia #memes.





American illustrator-cartoonist #ArthurBurdettFrost is a more modern example who, after meeting Muybridge and seeing #SallieGardner running projected on a wall, honoured him by illustrating the horse in motion. Sallie that is, not Eadweard.


1735 SEQUENTIAL ART IN PRE CINEMA ‘A RAKE’S PROGRESS’ WILLIAM HOGARTH (1697-1764) Looking back at sequential images in art, like paintings or illustrations of satire with caricatures and the like, takes us all the way back past the Pharaohs, to the man in the cave.



According to Marvin, his device did not depend on the elasticity of the cards for their support, as in the Toy Mutoscope of W. C. #Farnum of whom I have a series on. Marvin’s patent starts off as;

