RealHANS_BRIX

@LeadingReport He's gonna run Operation Human Shield with 34-42 yr old Democrats isn't he

BREAKING: U.S. Army is increasing the maximum enlistment age from 34 to 42.

Iran in 5 minutes to force another 2 months of war

A literal Russian asset directly overseeing America’s most high tech gear for its spies. What could go wrong?

Daryl Morey and Josh Harris I won’t forgive you

Did he expect him to get there by playing him 5 total minutes per game and benching him after one missed shot…?

This is basically sharing our IC-funded R&D intel with Putin. Masha Drokova, but make her DNI. Despicable vermin, all of these people.

Kash Patel congratulating Joe Biden for being incredible at reducing crime wasn't on my Bingo card

@TylerKelbaugh94 @TheDunkCentral @JDumasReports Might as well make a tribute to Joe too while we're at it. Have a full "we discarded you like common garbage even though your potential was obvious" tribute evening

@TheDunkCentral @JDumasReports Simply no way

The Philadelphia 76ers will have a tribute for Jared McCain tonight, per @JDumasReports

No strikes until the markets close Friday.

@unusual_whales In order to get the first post to be disliked into oblivion, I just have to say this bot riddled platform is the dumbest place on earth to roll this out

X has started rolling out a dislike button.

@TylerKelbaugh94 They got the wrong message from the No Kings protest. Sad

Probably very late, but just saw the news that Burger King fired the King. You can't do that. Needless to say I won't be returning. #StandwiththeKing

@Joe_SLP @bugo458043 @Osint613 No it's not that hard. The law in question under Crawford allowed voters to access free government issued ID, which the SAVE act doesn't provide Free documentation is literally the backbone of that ruling Not to mention the concerns of giving the DOJ & DHS voter rolls too

@RealhansB @bugo458043 @Osint613 In Crawford v. Marion County Election Board (2008), the Supreme Court upheld voter ID laws The Court said the burden of getting ID is not the same as a tax on voting. It’s not that hard.

JUST IN 🔴 The U.S. Senate advanced the SAVE America Act, 51‑48.

@bugo458043 @Joe_SLP @Osint613 That's nice, in America we have the 24th amendment which prohibits poll taxes or any tax that prohibits an individual from voting. If SAVE was genuine, a pathway to the required documentation would be provided for free & there wouldn't be a request for DHS/DOJ to get voter rolls

@RealhansB @Joe_SLP @Osint613 IDs cost money in my country, And we can't vote without ID. No ID voting is just plain dumb and opens the door to wrongdoing. I expect more from Amerika.

@Joe_SLP @Osint613 And yet, my AI-bot friend, it requires that cost. Makes you wonder why such an easy fix wasn't included in the bill to begin with My claim is accurate as ~50% of Americans don't have passports and ~10% of married women need additional documents to show name changes

The SAVE Act is about proving citizenship to register—not paying to vote. Most Americans already have a birth certificate or passport. If cost is an issue, waive the fees—easy fix. And the “50% of Americans don’t have documents” claim is total nonsense. The vast majority of Americans have valid ID or citizenship records. Stop inflating numbers to push a narrative.

@Joe_SLP @Osint613 Drivers licenses don't work under SAVE (5 states notwithstanding) The problem then becomes who has access to these documents. >50% of americans don't so that's an unconstitutional poll tax (have to pay for documents) Worse is that all states need to give voter rolls to DHS/DOJ

This is what I found that would be required. Let me know if you see any thing different. For Casting a Ballot (in Federal Elections) • Voters would need to show a strict photo ID at the polls (more restrictive than most current state laws). • Acceptable forms would be limited, such as: • State-issued driver’s license or non-driver ID (with photo and expiration date). • U.S. passport. • Military ID. • Certain tribal IDs (with expiration date and photo). • Student IDs, hunting licenses, or other non-standard IDs would generally not be accepted. • For mail-in/absentee voting, additional rules could apply, such as including a copy of ID with the ballot or providing SSN digits plus an affidavit. • Without proper ID, voters might cast a provisional ballot, but it would require follow-up steps to count.

@Joe_SLP @Osint613 If that's all SAVE did it would easily pass. Of course that's not all it does posting so others aren't duped by your deliberately misleading post

@Osint613 Anyone know why there shouldn’t be ID when voting?

@SenateGOP The SAVE Act is written as sketchy & legally dubious as it can be Poll tax elements make it likely to be struck down by SCOTUS Disenfranchisement issues are rampant But the most dangerous part is the absorption of voter rolls by DHS... SAVE must fail for federalism to live

Not true. The SAVE America Act simply requires Americans to show an ID at the polls—which a strong majority of Americans support. Democrats want to make it easier to cheat in elections.

To me this seems as straightforward as it gets. Europe recognizes that the US is pushing for a bipolar world (poles being US and China). You'll only get to partner with 1, so they're just going to sit in the middle and wait to see what makes sense for them when the dust settles

@sciencegirl Not normally one for cancel culture but we probably need to dox these girls

This is how sunscreen appears when applied in front of a UV camera.