
Daniel Simpson
883 posts



Pam Bondi led this Department with strength and conviction and I’m grateful for her leadership and friendship. Thank you to President Trump for the trust and the opportunity to serve as Acting Attorney General. We will continue backing the blue, enforcing the law, and doing everything in our power to keep America safe.



NEW: Sen. Ruben Gallego mulls a presidential race. He tells me after winning AZ in 2024: "We have to look at it." Supports U.S. $$ to Israel for defense: "I’ve seen civilians get hurt in war by both sides.” Opposes push to abolish ICE: "ridiculous." nbcnews.com/politics/2028-…


NYT: Where the main Senate Republican super PAC plans to spend Republican-held seats 🟥Ohio: $79 M 🟥North Carolina: $71 M 🟥Maine: $42 M 🟥Iowa: $29 M 🟥Alaska: $15 M --- Democratic-held seats 🟦Michigan: $45 M 🟦Georgia: $44 M 🟦New Hampshire: $17 M




When this is over, the western part of NATO will never be the same. Spain, England, France and Italy have sold us out, as they too often have a history of doing. Eastern European nations are the heart of NATO. They spend money on defense, know how to fight and love the US. France particularly deserves fault and blame. From supporting China and Russia at the UN to denying Americans overflight rights, they’re doing what they’ve always done - showing weakness, while cutting deals with terrorists. (The reason the US has a Marine Corps and Navy is unlike France, we refused to pay a ransom to the Barbary Pirates. France is always happy to cut a deal.) Wars have unintended consequences as nations show their true colors. NATO will never be the same, and Western European weakness and acquiescence is the cause.


Unfortunately, no one dedicated to the rule of law should have any interest in serving as Attorney General in this Administration.




What’s one game that your team lost that you’ll never get over?












You guys understand we’re going to lose the birthright citizenship case, right? Before you completely freak out, the traditional understanding of the 14th Amendment, which we are seeking to change, is not an insane reading of it. Nor are our arguments insane like the left has been same. That’s baloney to just shut us up. Neither side is frivolous. It’s a tough call legally and objectively speaking. But when we lose it, and I think we will, don’t freak out that this is some sort of conspiracy. It’s a hard legal decision. Sadly, we have three judges who aren’t even going to try to examine the question and will always vote for what leftists want. But the rest of the court has to make a tough legal call. I think our reading is the correct one. For various reasons, I think they’re going to rule against us. Don’t freak out when they do. It’s not an utterly irrational ruling like so many of the district court opinions we’ve seen.




This is a line the Legal Right are loving, but ten years from now we’ll look back and determine that this was the moment that the rest of the Right decisively turns against Originalism (it was already becoming a shaky relationship)







