Daniel Simpson

883 posts

Daniel Simpson

Daniel Simpson

@Remi8225

Katılım Mayıs 2025
1 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@JonahDispatch She’s been far from perfect as AG, but all those people are criminals. I mean they have Keith Ellison ON TAPE committing bribery. Jonah and Kevin are just really pissed off about their buddy’s Bolton prosecution, who btw is 110% guilty as fuck.
English
0
0
0
230
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@BrentScher Anyone but Kari fucking Lake would’ve beaten that cartel spawn midget.
English
0
0
0
91
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@varadmehta I’d swap Alaska and Iowa, the dem party in Iowa is a freak show, bordering Minnesotastan, they praised Luigi Mangioni who killed an Iowa boy Brian Thompson, Ian Roberts fiasco, Hinson is raising really good money, and for gov Rob Sand is just a weirdo.
English
0
0
0
22
Bill Melugin
Bill Melugin@BillMelugin_·
NEW: ICE records show Iranian General Soleimani's niece, HAMIDEH SOLEIMANI AFSHAR, is now being held in ICE detention at ICE's South Texas Detention Facility in Pearsall, TX. ICE initially arrested her in Los Angeles. Her daughter, HOSSEINY SARINASADAT, is at the same facility.
English
442
1.2K
10.3K
289.4K
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@NateSilver538 Fuentes and Hinkle are Demokkkrat communists, so they should be blue, on your side Nate.
English
0
0
0
4
Nate Silver
Nate Silver@NateSilver538·
These are the Twitter/X accounts with the most engagement so far in 2026. I suppose I had some intuition for how bad it was, but jeez, this is what you get when the ecosystem is broken.
Nate Silver tweet media
English
7.2K
5.2K
27.9K
18.1M
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@JonahDispatch No Jonah, the real problem with NATO is the endless hordes of evil Islamists they’ve imported for the last 20 years, they’re TERRIFIED of offending them.
English
0
0
0
275
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@EdWhelanEPPC Ed here was asleep between 2017-2025 when the DOJ do everything they could fucking think of, KGB style, to put Trump in prison.
English
0
0
1
113
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@MarkKaboly Hell no to Cousins or Carr. Howard or Rudolph would get the same results as them. Rodgers was actually pretty good last year with absolute shit shit SHIT coaches, and a pretty damn bad supporting cast around him.
English
0
0
0
137
Mark Kaboly
Mark Kaboly@MarkKaboly·
Kirk Cousins to the Raiders just removed the Steelers potential backup plan in case Aaron Rodgers doesn't re-sign with them. If, for some unforeseen reason, Rodgers doesn't return to the Steelers, it's going to be Will Howard/Mason Rudolph fighting for QB1.
English
136
27
697
58.4K
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@Steelersdepot Wait, what???? I thought Rooney and Tomlin were BIG progressive liberal Marxist equity DEI types???
English
0
0
0
223
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@damintoell The law says it RIGHT THERE, “AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” These aliens are NOT U.S. subjects, it’s RIGHT FUCKING THERE!!! Why was the Native American citizenship act of 1924 necessary if this wasn’t the case??? It took an AFFIRMATIVE act of Congress for them.
English
0
0
0
46
Damin Toell
Damin Toell@damintoell·
"It is the law that governs, not the intent of the lawgiver. That seems to me the essence of the famous American ideal set forth in the Massachusetts constitution: A government of laws, not of men. Men may intend what they will; but it is only the laws that they enact which bind us." Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (1997)
Damin Toell tweet media
English
50
55
375
67.3K
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@JonahDispatch Where in the constitution is gay marriage??? NOWHERE!!!! Yet, dammit all, if this court didn’t just make it up.
English
0
0
0
92
Jonah Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg@JonahDispatch·
My warm take on birthright citizenship: Wholly defensible to be against it as policy and wholly reasonable to want to reform it in some way. Also intellectually defensible to say that the 14th amendment is being misinterpreted. Doesn't mean I agree, but I don't think it's crazy either. But even if you win that argument, you still need to deal with century+ of precedent and statutory language that codifies it and has created massive reliance interests. I consider it an open question whether Congress can repeal or modify birthright citizenship. I think it is absolutely nuts and dangerous to think a president can repeal it through executive order, and defending the E.O. because you agree with the underlying policy is itself indefensible. That's it. That's my take.
English
449
182
2.3K
316.7K
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@neoavatara It really is, but you’re just a foreign leftist, Roberts wants invites to DC cocktail parties, Barrett Souter and Kavanaugh succumbing to leftists threats to their lives, and Gorsuch is a kook libertarian like his old boss. Remind me where in the constitution gay marriage is??
English
0
0
0
20
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@KurtSchlichter This whole issue is a bureaucratic fuck up from the Truman years by the Soc Security administration, illegitimate immigrants were not given birth certificates until then.
English
0
0
0
2
Kurt Schlichter
Kurt Schlichter@KurtSchlichter·
You guys understand we’re going to lose the birthright citizenship case, right? Before you completely freak out, the traditional understanding of the 14th Amendment, which we are seeking to change, is not an insane reading of it. Nor are our arguments insane like the left has been same. That’s baloney to just shut us up. Neither side is frivolous. It’s a tough call legally and objectively speaking. But when we lose it, and I think we will, don’t freak out that this is some sort of conspiracy. It’s a hard legal decision. Sadly, we have three judges who aren’t even going to try to examine the question and will always vote for what leftists want. But the rest of the court has to make a tough legal call. I think our reading is the correct one. For various reasons, I think they’re going to rule against us. Don’t freak out when they do. It’s not an utterly irrational ruling like so many of the district court opinions we’ve seen.
English
1.4K
399
3.8K
1.3M
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@TonerousHyus He should just declare all immigrants “foreign diplomats”, so none of them are covered by the 14th.
English
0
0
0
23
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@billybinion Yeah, too bad Roberts and Barrett Souter don’t give 2 shits about the 2nd amendment, they have rejected EVERY SINGLE challenge to gun rights infringements, EVERY FUCKING ONE Billy, go look it up chump.
English
0
0
2
510
Billy Binion
Billy Binion@billybinion·
Perhaps my favorite Supreme Court exchange in recent memory: Solicitor general: “It’s a new world." John Roberts: "It's a new world. It's the same Constitution." Into my veins 😌
English
403
3.8K
33.1K
764.2K
Daniel Simpson
Daniel Simpson@Remi8225·
@TheRealBeliveau You’ve already handed this country over to the radical left, you just want to profit off our destruction while you can.
English
0
0
1
38
André Béliveau
André Béliveau@TheRealBeliveau·
The conservative legal movement and originalism has been the strongest defense and offense for American conservatism. Undermining it would hand over the nation to the radical left and cement it for a century or more. That’s the definition of political stupidity.
Hampton Prescott@HamptonPrezcott

This is a line the Legal Right are loving, but ten years from now we’ll look back and determine that this was the moment that the rest of the Right decisively turns against Originalism (it was already becoming a shaky relationship)

English
9
15
94
13.5K