Sabitlenmiş Tweet
'Uthmān
720 posts
@Sajidakhan9703 @SpreadHaqq Unfortunately, Bashir is unfamiliar with the Arabic which explicitly states 'مَا أَنَا عَلَيْهِ وَأَصْحَابِي'
I'm confident that you'll provide him with the much needed education that is lacking in his Tarbiyyah.
May Allāh liberate him from Ghulām and guide him towards Islām.
Română
@SpreadHaqq Likeness of the Sahaba?😂
Sahaba weren't writing loyalty letters to Queen Victoria or claiming prophethood from a British pension.
Your so-called "jama'ah" needed colonial backing.....ours needed only the Qur'an and Sunnah.
English
"THE UMMAH IS BEING PUNISHED"... A Qadiyani Thread DEBUNKED
Rejecting a False Prophet and a British-registered messiah= causes sectarian violence/ punishment?
Let's go:
SpreadHaqq@SpreadHaqq
THE UMMAH IS BEING PUNISHED🧵
English
@SpreadHaqq @Sajidakhan9703 Hello Bashir. It's been a while.
Ahmad in the Qur'ān is refering to RasūlAllāh ﷺ and not Ghulām.
Tirmidhi 2641 doesn't state مثلي و أصحابه as you have claimed. You may want to read it again. The Hadīth is explicitly clear and leaves no room for your Ghulām and his followers.
Català
Last part is a baseless accusation just as jews basically accuse 'Isa (as)
Lol you're proving the point while trying to refute it.. SubhanAllah. How Allah makes the signs clear.
Also Ahmad is LITERALLY mentioned in the Qur'ān.
It says the correct sect is like me and my sahaba.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) is in the likeness of the Muhamamd ﷺ (as prophesied clearly) and we are in the likeness of the sahaba (ra).
You guys have no such thing. Not even a jama'ah.. x.com/SpreadHaqq/sta…
English
@Bushra1Shaikh @muftimenk Menk is pathetic. He has a long history that needs unpacking. As far back as Hasanat and Umm Abdullah scandal. Keep digging and you'll see a trend emerging.
English
Respectfully @muftimenk I wasn't attempting to 'cancel' you. As you can see, I've followed your work and attended some of your lectures. I simply asked a question, which echoes the thoughts of thousands- Why we've never seen an X post by yourself directly addressing Israel. Regarded representatives of the global Muslim community are held to higher expectations.
And as 'picking on you' goes, threatening me indirectly on Instagram is not ok.
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed So I pose the same question again. Explain how this is a contradiction and substantiate your response with evidence from authentic Islāmic sources.
👇🏽
x.com/Resisting_bati…
'Uthmān@Resisting_batil
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed So I ask you again. How does it contradict Qur'ān? You've still failed to explain why it's a contradiction, when the Salaf didn't view it as a contradiction & RasūlAllāh ﷺ swore an oath 'Eesa Ibn Maryam عليه السلام will be alive in the Last Days. 2/2
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed It's exactly about what RasūlAllāh ﷺ said, as he was the Messenger who understood the Qur'ān better than anyone and taught his Sahābah.
Therefore it's not possible that he should contradict the Qur'ān.
Allāh ﷻ Himself clarifies this. 👇🏽
x.com/Resisting_bati…
'Uthmān@Resisting_batil
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed As mentioned before, it's not possible for Sahīh Ahadīth to contradict the Qur'ān. As Allāh state in His Book: وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلۡهَوَىٰٓ "Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination." إِنۡ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحۡيࣱ يُوحَىٰ "It is not but a revelation revealed" 1/2
Català
These unbelievers are always spinning lies without ANY shame. They literally left out the conclusion that At-Tabari gave. The same conclusion in every book of tafseer. That Eesaa AS is alive and will return, kill the false prophet and only THEN will he die.
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed I could ask you the exact same question. What part did you not understand?
The part about authentication or mass transmission?
Or was it about how RasūlAllāh ﷺ doesn't speak from his own desires?
You've not substantiated your claims at all.
English
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed If you don't know what is meant by transmission, then how do you know the Qur'ān wasn't transmitted Mutawātiran?
Do you understand what is meant by transmission?
English
@Resisting_batil @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed No one transmitted quran, it was revelation, sent by Allah or "wahi" as in arabic. What do you mean by transmission??
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed So I ask you again. How does it contradict Qur'ān?
You've still failed to explain why it's a contradiction, when the Salaf didn't view it as a contradiction & RasūlAllāh ﷺ swore an oath 'Eesa Ibn Maryam عليه السلام will be alive in the Last Days.
2/2
Català
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed As mentioned before, it's not possible for Sahīh Ahadīth to contradict the Qur'ān.
As Allāh state in His Book:
وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلۡهَوَىٰٓ
"Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination."
إِنۡ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحۡيࣱ يُوحَىٰ
"It is not but a revelation revealed"
1/2
Română
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed You've stated "Jesus living in heaven contradicts quran"
How does it contradict Qur'ān?
You've failed to explain why it's a contradiction, when the Salaf didn't view it as a contradiction & RasūlAllāh ﷺ swore an oath 'Eesa Ibn Maryam عليه السلام will be alive in the Last Days.
Català
@Resisting_batil @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed A dead man living in the heaven contradicts every hadith and modern science.
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed I'm not sure where you got that from.
Again, I've yet to come across a single Sahīh Hadīth that ever contradicted the Qur'ān. It's simply impossible. Those who transmitted the Qur'ān, transmitted Ahadīth.
Do you understand what is meant by transmission?
English
@Resisting_batil @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed So you mean Allah send it as wahi to the people who wrote it down? That was new 😆😆
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed How does it contradict the Qur'ān?
You've failed to explain why it's a contradiction, when the Salaf didn't view it as a contradiction and RasūlAllāh ﷺ swore an oath 'Eesa Ibn Maryam عليه السلام will be alive in the Last Days.
Català
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed I've yet to come across a single Sahīh Hadīth that ever contradicted the Qur'ān. It's simply impossible. Those who transmitted the Qur'ān, transmitted Ahadīth.
Română
@Resisting_batil @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed It's not impossible as they are gathered by humans and humans do mistakes
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed I've yet to come across a single Sahīh Hadīth that ever contradicted the Qur'ān. It's simply impossible.
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed As mentioned before, it's not possible for Sahīh Ahadīth to contradict the Qur'ān.
As Allāh state in His Book:
وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلۡهَوَىٰٓ
"Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination."
إِنۡ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحۡيࣱ يُوحَىٰ
"It is not but a revelation revealed"
Română
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed But one that can be summarised:
🔹 Sahīh Ahadīth don't contradict the Qur'ān.
🔹 RasūlAllāh ﷺ told us about 'Eesa Ibn Maryam عليه السلام being alive in the Last Days.
🔹 Qur'ān testifies RasūlAllāh ﷺ doesn't speak from his own desires
🔹3:144 doesn't not include ALL Messengers.
Català
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed This is incorrect. Ahadīth were transmitted from the time of RasūlAllāh ﷺ himself along side the Qur'ān.
When Imām Al-Bukhāri compiled his Sahīh, he only included authentic narrations. That was the whole point of his compilation; it is the most authentic book to be authored.
Català
@Resisting_batil @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed You are not getting my point. Hadiths were collected and published more than two hundred years after the death of prophet and that means there could be many faults and week traditions in those. Quran can confirm hadith not vice versa
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed In this case there is no contradiction as we RasūlAllāh ﷺ told us upon oath about 'Eesa Ibn Maryam عليه السلام
Català
@Resisting_batil @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed I think we are looking it at from different angles. If there is no contradiction then there is no problem. If there is a contradiction then the Quran is the supreme authority and that hadith should be discarted
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed I'm not Pakistani. I don't speak Urdu. Please summarise the main points you would like to bring forward.
As mentioned before, there are no issues with Sahīh Ahadīth and the Qur'ān, as RasūlAllāh ﷺ doesn't speak from his own desires, rather it's wahi.
x.com/Resisting_bati…
'Uthmān@Resisting_batil
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed It's not possible for Sahīh Ahadīth to contradict the Qur'ān. As Allāh state in His Book: وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلۡهَوَىٰٓ "Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination." As this Hadīth is Sahīh, it's not possible for it to be contradictory. The Qur'ān testifies to it.
English
@Resisting_batil @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed While i was looking for this stuff i came along this tweet..do take a look x.com/i/status/19078…
Sonia Khan khattak(SK)@Soniakhan1pak
حمزیہ علی عباسی کی ا نتہائی مدلل گفتگو توہین مذہب پر جو وقت کی ضرورت ہے ۔ ضرور سُنیے
English
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed But there is no contradiction with the Hadīth and the Qur'ān as per my previous tweet.
x.com/Resisting_bati…
'Uthmān@Resisting_batil
@Nauman_majid69 @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed It's not possible for Sahīh Ahadīth to contradict the Qur'ān. As Allāh state in His Book: وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلۡهَوَىٰٓ "Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination." As this Hadīth is Sahīh, it's not possible for it to be contradictory. The Qur'ān testifies to it.
English
@Resisting_batil @AbuKunafah @damusshaheed As i see with my humble knowledge you can call a hadith as ''sahih'' as long it does not contradict the Quran but if it differs from the quran then it can not be accepted as ''sahih''. there are probabaly many diffrent thoughts about it
English