Frank Visser

THE SILLY SIXTEEN featured in THE CORONA CONSPIRACY series by Frank Visser - integralworld.net/visser208.html - David Icke, Andrew Kaufman, plus: Bailey, Borger, Cowan, Engel, Engelbrecht, Fuellmich, Lanka, McKernan, Malhotra, Mikovits, Ossenbaard, Savalle, Scoglio, Li-Meng Yan.

@Simi_2210_ 1

If you solve this in under 10 seconds, you’re officially a genius

@Simi_2210_ 4 + 4x4 = 16

99.9% get this wrong because they forget basic order of operations. What’s "a"?

@KhushiDiva2 95

99% failed to answer this 👀 Can you solve this👇

@Simi_2210_ 6/2=3

Only 1 in 10 solve this correctly on the first try. What's your answer?

@Simi_2210_ 3 45+15=60 45-15=30 45:15=3

Who is the topper here ...? Let's solve this if you're top iQ level

@RichardDawkins Are AI’s conscious? We don’t even understand human consciousness.

#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-… I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.

@RichardDawkins Wrote this short article explaining why LLMs can't be conscious: x.com/anagogistis/st…

@iamAtheistGirl Heaven is Greek, resurrection is Jewish. Christianity mixed the two. Noone ever understood the hybrid doctrine.

ask 50 different christians what heaven is supposed to be and they will give you 50 different answers and none of them will match the bibles description

@RichardDawkins Where would that consciousness exactly reside, when millions of people simultaneously use Claude or any other LLM?

“In recent years a small but vocal group of activists and commentators has argued that advanced AI systems may already be sentient. The claim is often made in sweeping terms: AI deserves moral consideration, or AI might suffer. But where, exactly, would that sentience reside?”

@RichardDawkins “While not the final word (future architectures could shift the ground), it sets a high bar: any serious claim of machine sentience must solve the “where” problem without absurd multiplication or hand-waving. In an era of anthropomorphic hype, …it is a valuable corrective.”

@SqSehrish 300

Even AI struggles with this one Are you smarter than a robot..?

@Beno10_MFC 8 10+(5x8)=50

Only the smartest nearly got the value of C. It requires top level IQ Can you solve?

@Beno10_MFC 180-30-30=120

Test your IQ level Can you find the missing angel?

@Jennnyyyyyy 20

This is harder than it looks 😉 Difficulty - Extremely Hard 🤯

@akazlev @JanJekielek No, Meyer is an Old Earth creationist. He writes about the Cambrian Explosion, as if God created the formation of phylae. How? God only knows LOL.

Yes, it's much more likely an invisible man in the sky made everything. Question: is Mayer a YEC? If so, how does he explain astronomy, geology, and fossils (the omphalos problem) If not, does he believe his supernatural deity is constantly popping new species out of nowhere, and has been doing so for over four billion years on Earth, and indeed is constantly doing so across trillions of planets throughout the observable universe, even those without intelligent life, even those without an alien Jesus (assuming the Christian God sens a Jesus to every planet with intelligent life). Or does he believes Earth is the only planet in the universe with life? Premodern religions only make sense if you believe in a premodern cosmology, that stars are jokes in the firmament etc. Once the vast cosmos discovered by empirical science is introduced, the whole thing becomes absurd.

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” @stephencmeyer