Human Baby Children Owner!

I think I'm going to start referring to all of America as Texas and call all Americans, Texans until they learn the difference between England and Britain.

@anon_opin "most Brits". We don't give a shit about the name mate. Most of us aren't terminally online and upset that a word has 2 meanings

It would be a huge relief to most Brits if we changed the name of our biggest oil seed crop to "canola" like the Americans.

@wydyama Manual is fine.

There’s no way y’all like driving manual everyday

In honour of #ChuckNorris. A final fact. Chuck Norris just won The Game

@Aidan73656599 @RiverTornado86 @oldtoons_ Yeah. It's very well done but you can definitely tell in the later seasons if your looking

@RiverTornado86 @oldtoons_ Oh shit really?

What are your favorite characters with this dynamic?

@RiverTornado86 @oldtoons_ Literally came to say this

@oelma__ Only the ones who can't phase through them

Do men still open doors?

@anon_opin Well that's just not true. I've seen conspiracy theories that the moon is a projection by NASA. This is ignoring the face it's referenced in documents, stories and paintings going back thousands of years

Saying aliens built the pyramids is the laziest conspiracy. There's tons of hard evidence it was done by humans, we just can't agree on the actual specifics of how. If you can't grasp that people back then were just as clever and ingenious as us then that's your problem.

@lilsketch Dwayne!

gun pointed at yo head, name a rock

@TerraOrBust Like I said. No actual counter points. Good job buddy

@ReviewingRemy We've reached the part of the conversation where you're too infantile to admit that your earlier statements were wholly wrong, and that I was completely right. That's where we are. You're pathetic.

"So you want the UK to join the EU?" "Yes" "So you want to give up the Pound and accept the Euro" "No" "So you want to join the Schengen area and allow completely open borders" "No" "So you want to be part of the EU Migration Pact, another 100k illegal migrants to the UK a year" "No" "So you want to re-introduce the testing of cosmetics onto animals, required by EU law" "No" "So you want to re-introduce live exports of animals for fattening or slaughter" "No" "So you want to give control of UK fishing waters and quotas back to the EU" "No" "So you want to reverse the protections of UK marine birds like puffins, who were endangered due to EU overfishing of the main food source" "No" "So you want to give up the better trade relationship the UK now has with the USA, Japan, India, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Singapore, and countless other countries" "No" "Well it sounds like you don't want to join the EU then"

@TerraOrBust I see we've reached the part of the discussion where you have no actual points, can't respond appropriately to anything given so are just going to name call because you think it'll upset me and win you imaginary Internet points. Good luck with that

@ReviewingRemy HAHAHAHAHAHAHA No they're not. You were just caught spouting your ignorance and are too pathetic to admit that you were wrong. It's ok sweetie. We can all see you for the pathetic liar that you are.

@TerraOrBust Yeah... Cos they're different regulations with different purposes doing different things. I explained in some detail. It's ok. I know reading is hard.

@ReviewingRemy Remember when you said this, and said you knew what you were talking about? "EU cosmetic regulation doesn't allow in vivo testing" You remember this, right? Seeing as you only need to scroll up to see it?

@TerraOrBust So literally everything I just said.... Cool.

@ReviewingRemy Sweetie. The REACH regulations say that animal testing *must* be performed, if no other method is available. In the UK it is BANNED. I think this simple topic might be too difficult for your teeny tiny brain.

@TerraOrBust No, it says it CAN be permitted. The requirement is to prove worker safety. Not end user. Other methods can also be used to prove worker safety thereby meeting the requirement.

@ReviewingRemy What. Which part of this do you not understand? Are the words too long for you? EU REACH regulations *require* testing on animals. The UK removed that requirement, diverging from the EU. It seems that you think testing on animals is a price worth paying for a red passport.

@TerraOrBust Cool way to disprove non of what I've said. You should actually read the article not just just the headline. It's filled with journalistic weasel words and an inflammatory headline people like you latch on to.

@ReviewingRemy Erm. Do try to keep up. It's almost like you're incapable of reading, or just too arrogant to accept the possibility that you don't have a clue what you're talking about. networkforanimals.org/uk-diverges-fr…

@TerraOrBust The UK is subject to UK REACH which is the same regulations copied wholesale from brexit. But other than that. 3.

@TerraOrBust REACH shares data between registrants meaning only one set of data is needed for all the companies that need it. New data isnt required, you can use historical. In vivo data isn't necessarily required, you can use in vitro, in silico and read across as part of the registration 2/

@TheCinesthetic Die hard 4 is a solid dumb action movie. It's a crap die hard movie. 5 is just shit all round

Live Free or Die Hard (2007) is better than the franchise reputation it gets stuck with. The practical stunts, and the McClane–Justin Long dynamic give it real personality. The fifth film collapsed the brand, but this one doesn’t belong in that category.

@JackRitchie_YT @redhead_ophelia Uh-hu..... Is the country unnamed? Because Europe isn't a homogeneous lump

@redhead_ophelia Everyone getting pissy in the comments is so embarrassing. The reason it isn’t specified is because it’s based on a book set in a deliberately fictional, unnamed town.

“Small European town” American hands wrote this summary.