Richard Peter Reader

583 posts

Richard Peter Reader

Richard Peter Reader

@RichPeterReader

dats me, Dick Reader

Katılım Kasım 2025
16 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
Blocked me rather than engage with the argument. Hard not to read that as 'stop making me look wrong'.
Richard Peter Reader tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@The_Mess85 My position never changed 'Show me perfectly safe' and 'the literature describes managed risk' Both were correct; including by your own sources You could’ve made a solid point by shifting your focus early on to acknowledge that what I said instead of doubling down for 35+ cmmts
English
1
0
0
10
The_Mess
The_Mess@The_Mess85·
@RichPeterReader > warns user to not FAFO > user proceeds to double down on quoting mining and ignoring all risk assessment 101. > user still ignores the other stuff, still whinging about "insults". /picks-up-the-sledgehammer Tick-Tock. Last chance, start arguing properly or it's ban time
English
2
0
0
14
The_Mess
The_Mess@The_Mess85·
Lawl, as per usual I have dragged out some papers and as per fucking usual the transphobe has proceeded to not read them and engage in fucking sophistry. All because this shitbird does not want to admit HRT is safe in context of the risk vs benefits. Anyhow, the papers...
English
2
0
0
29
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@The_Mess85 This has gone from an argument to a meltdown. You’ve posted walls of insults but still haven’t engaged with the point; your own sources describe managed risk(; i.e. known risks that can occur and are handled by adjusting treatment or managing side effects, not 'perfectly safe'.
English
1
0
0
10
The_Mess
The_Mess@The_Mess85·
@RichPeterReader ...instead of being an utter fucking schmuck and making all of us who understand trans related health care consider you a loud, brainless manchild who is only interested in trolling. Oh and ffs, just read the fucking papers already, if my ADHD addled self can do, so can you.
English
1
0
0
14
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@sana8163 @JessicaTheGreen Considering healthy means "doesnt immediately implode or turn to fights" yet always revolves into partners separating. I think theres a legit issue
English
1
0
0
119
Dollface
Dollface@sana8163·
@JessicaTheGreen Is there any moral or scientific reason people hate healthy poly relationships or is it just funny to shame people for their looks
English
16
0
37
8.8K
Jessica Green 💚
Jessica Green 💚@JessicaTheGreen·
Don't hate me for this but, I don't buy "poly" relationships. I think its just uglies grouping up for survival.
English
446
2.1K
38.6K
1M
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@KaskaJessica I like how every Trans person uses their own anecdote to say the umbrella follows the same rules. Really, if you cant even admit that if it was true theres a serious issue and hold your stance. Then maybe your stance is the problem.
English
0
0
2
255
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@bri_br4t Considering half of Americans dont pay anything, all OF creators fall into the category
English
0
0
0
26
bri
bri@bri_br4t·
"what do O F girls contribute to society" babe i pay more in taxes than the average american grosses. i FUND society.
English
421
112
2.3K
97.8K
Winter 🖤
Winter 🖤@thewinterdollx·
If a couple is not ready to maybe have : - a gay kid 🏳️‍🌈 - a trans kid 🏳️‍⚧️ - a disabled kid 🌸 - a non-religious kid ✝️ - or a kid who’s different in general 🍀 Then they should NEVER have kids ☺️
English
193
162
1.1K
19.3K
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
If a couple is not ready to maybe have : - a straight kid - a athletic kid - a disabled kid - a religious non muslim kid ✝️ - or a kid who’s normal in general Then they should NEVER have kids ☺️
Winter 🖤@thewinterdollx

If a couple is not ready to maybe have : - a gay kid 🏳️‍🌈 - a trans kid 🏳️‍⚧️ - a disabled kid 🌸 - a non-religious kid ✝️ - or a kid who’s different in general 🍀 Then they should NEVER have kids ☺️

English
0
0
1
19
Hugo
Hugo@Hugoknowsball96·
@esjesjesj I love how everyone cares so much about civilian fraud when the military industrial complex is literally 10x more than all frauds in US history combined in a single year but no one bats an eye… society is captured beyond reason
English
9
3
84
3.1K
evan loves worf
evan loves worf@esjesjesj·
No evidence of fraud has been found at any of the sites Nick Shirley visited. Sorry that this upsets you
evan loves worf tweet media
English
157
268
7.5K
92K
Richard Peter Reader retweetledi
I laughed
I laughed@found_it_funny·
I laughed tweet media
ZXX
58
644
18.5K
417K
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@reddit_lies Anything factual you point out about Trans and medicine always spirals into them lying and portraying it in the most infactual way possible.
English
0
0
3
76
Reddit Lies
Reddit Lies@reddit_lies·
If "Nobody's advocating for surgery on children" then there's no issue putting a rule in place banning it, right?
Reddit Lies tweet media
English
25
33
554
9.5K
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@The_Mess85 You’ve ended up agreeing with my position, 'managed risk', while pretending that’s what you said from the start. Everything else has just been deflection. If framing and integrity mattered, you wouldn’t have tried to pass it off as 'perfectly safe' in the first place.
English
1
0
0
14
The_Mess
The_Mess@The_Mess85·
@RichPeterReader tick-tock, bans hovering and you're still missing the "...as long as you take care..." bit after it. But by all means continue to FAFO, all you do is reinforce my take on you being a lackwitted fucktard. And it means no more wasting time on your inability to read critically.
English
1
0
0
10
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@The_Mess85 You made your claim, got corrected, and instead of owning it you pivoted to insults and rewriting your position. Nothing you’ve said since has changed that. What's even crazier is its the same everywhere you go.
English
0
0
0
6
The_Mess
The_Mess@The_Mess85·
@RichPeterReader ...unfortunately will likely elude you completely due to your intellectual shortcomings XD Now to see if you can actually think, or are naught but sad trans-obsessed troll.
English
1
0
0
5
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@The_Mess85 This entire exchange has just been you making a claim, getting corrected, then pivoting to insults and pretending you said something different. No amount of deflection changes that. If your argument was solid, you wouldn’t need to keep rewriting it.
English
0
0
0
7
The_Mess
The_Mess@The_Mess85·
@RichPeterReader ...if you don't like being called one, maybe don't be one in the first fucking place kid. Not hard, hell even I can manage that regularly. But you never bothered to see past my chewing on trolls lawl. Because you evidently have issues with reading XD
English
1
0
0
7
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@The_Mess85 Your own sources don’t say what you claimed. They describe managed risk, exactly what I said; not ‘perfectly safe.’
English
1
0
0
16
The_Mess
The_Mess@The_Mess85·
@RichPeterReader ...either start engaging with the papers content rationally or I'm going to block you for time wasting alone. Oh and harassing me elsewhere was a very dumb idea kid, because even my autistic self can see it's socially wrong. Outside of very specific ethical guidelines. Which...
English
2
0
0
15
Richard Peter Reader
Richard Peter Reader@RichPeterReader·
@The_Mess85 Kinda wild you argue with yourself no matter where you go. All while you project and insult others. >make claim x >get told claim is actually Y >get upset and go on a tirade while proving claim is Y Can't imagine how you function irl when it happens everywhere you go
English
1
0
0
11
The_Mess
The_Mess@The_Mess85·
@RichPeterReader ...papers either lawl. Anyhow, the fundamental underlying issue with risks is they are always contextual. Take driving for example, it's "perfectly safe" as far as common sense would say, as long as you do the right things. But it still carries with it a statistically...
English
2
0
0
17
Dev
Dev@sleepy_devo·
nobody reasonable actually thinks that trans women metamorphose into biological females you fucking retard. the ask is not "believe that men are women", it's "don't be an asshole". you don't have to like trans people. you do have to leave them alone.
CrashN'Burn@BangeSnuskuk

@sleepy_devo @machukorz I'd say it's about as likely as a man ever becoming a woman.

English
454
19
580
389.7K