RicK

2.4K posts

RicK banner
RicK

RicK

@Ricky1oM

4 years in Crypto

Katılım Ekim 2021
1.3K Takip Edilen223 Takipçiler
RicK retweetledi
Project Lobster
Project Lobster@lobsternft_lol·
AI agent NFT Project @lobsternft_lol 🦞 Price: Freemint Supply: 3333 Chain: Tempo Personality: Unknown You know how magic happens 👀🪄
Project Lobster tweet media
English
1.3K
1.1K
2.6K
19.4K
Tech Home 
Tech Home @TechHome100·
iPhone 18 Pro Max 🍎 ▫️ 6.9" 144Hz Ultra Pro Motion Display ▫️ Smaller Dynamic Island ▫️ A20 Pro Chip ▫️ 200MP IMX993 (1/1.12") Main unit ▫️ 48MP IMX975 UW (1/2") ▫️ 48MP IMX977 (4x) Periscope Telephoto (1/1.56") ▫️ 2 Day Battery 🔋 #Apple #iPhone18
English
20
10
220
13K
Spring Development Bank
Spring Development Bank@SpringDevBank·
Sweet December Giveaway! Win Your 500 $SDB Token! To celebrate our growing Spring Galaxy ecosystem, we are giving away 500 SDB to 50 winners with a total prize pool of 25,000 SDB. To join the giveaway: 1. Retweet with hashtags 2. Mention 2 Friends  3. Comment how you feel about $SDB Token on this post Take part in the future of digital finance and join this challenge before 7 December. Hold the token that defines the next generation of financial freedom. #SDBToken #SweetDecemberGiveaway #SpringDevelopmentBank #ChooseSDB
Spring Development Bank tweet media
English
920
624
986
39.1K
RicK retweetledi
Digi (Delusional)
Digi (Delusional)@digiii·
Been holding and accumulating $JUP since the airdrop and its painful what turns this chart around????? asking for me
Digi (Delusional) tweet media
English
28
3
44
3K
RicK
RicK@Ricky1oM·
@MikeTheGambler_ 75kuygMYepbhKmLfaUvwZmQdpskfxBDyYjZKLX1qa5D6
RicK tweet media
Tiếng Việt
0
0
1
18
RicK retweetledi
MikeTheGambler
MikeTheGambler@MikeTheGambler_·
$HUMA & $JUP GIVEAWAY Rules: -Like & Report -Follow @MikeTheGambler_ -Turn on notis -Reply with your $SOL address + proof of notis Prize: $25 in $HUMA or $25 in $JUP Winner picked in about 24 hours!
English
230
112
153
61.6K
Retired Chad (Monad Arc)
Retired Chad (Monad Arc)@retiredchaddev·
Composition of public wallet as shown by Jupiter portfolio.
Retired Chad (Monad Arc) tweet media
English
14
2
89
29.4K
RicK retweetledi
Kim Aris
Kim Aris@KimAris77·
I spoke today as a son — for my mother, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, and for the people of Burma suffering under the junta’s cruelty. The world may look away, but they have not lost hope. Justice, freedom, and humanity must prevail. #FreeAungSanSuuKyi #JusticeForBurma
English
2
46
108
2.2K
Didi
Didi@DidiTrading·
Day 333: Received 10,000 $MET tokens (~$11.5K OTC) just for tweeting about Meteora last year. Back then I had less than 1,000 followers, so no one can have an excuse. Building your own brand on X is hands down the best thing you can do in crypto. In a bull market, an account my size can easily pull in mid-six figures on X alone. It took me 333 days of posting daily to reach this point. If that doesn’t inspire you to start, nothing will.
Didi tweet media
English
96
12
605
62.5K
RicK retweetledi
Gio
Gio@whalegio·
CRAZY GIVEAWAY 🚨 I’m proud to announce that we are giving away $1000 dollar of $ME tokens 1K UP FOR GRABS 🧳 How to enter 🎟️ - Follow: @utxo_giovianni & @MagicEden - Like, retweet and tag 3 friends Closing in 48hrs
Gio tweet media
English
606
449
541
23.1K
RicK retweetledi
CWH
CWH@WalkerHebborn·
gME 🪄 As promised - I’m giving away 180 $ME To ONE lucky winner. ✨ Like & Repost ✨ Follow @WalkerHebborn ✨ Comment $ME Winner in 48hr
GIF
English
916
520
582
26.4K
Prince Swanny🦢
Prince Swanny🦢@SwannyDeFi·
This is the allocation I got from the 365 days $JUP staking wallet of 2025🫡 I haven't quit the 50 $JUP daily staking (it reached 20k right now) Over the ASR, the $HUMA presale, now I got this 576 $MET Everything just for being a good cat! thanks @JupiterExchange 💚
Prince Swanny🦢 tweet media
English
35
7
231
14.5K
kash
kash@kashdhanda·
TL;DR: @jup_dao will be focused on high-impact voting - no more Work Groups, fewer votes overall. $JUP Unstaking period coming down to 7 days. @litterboxtrust's current holdings (~121m $JUP right now) will be burned if approved by DAO vote. additional vote to come on what to do with the ongoing amounts. Onwards and upwards my friends
English
42
36
421
23.6K
kash
kash@kashdhanda·
A Fresh Start for $JUP (Major Changes Coming) This one is for the token holders. The ride or dies. The folks who have held through up and down, supporting a project they believe has the ability to change the future of finance. We know it hasn’t been easy lately. But here’s the good news: we hear you. And we’re moving to make changes inspired by your ideas and our deep reflections on what $JUP should be. In classic Jupiter style tho, this is going to be a somewhat long essay. Before we can step into the new future, we must acknowledge the past and clearly articulate how we’re changing our approach going forward. But if you read the whole essay, you’ll find 3 major changes that demonstrate how important your feedback has been over the last few weeks/months. —- Reflections on $JUP The $JUP token was initially aimed to be the lynchpin of the Jupiter DAO. That worked quite well to kick things off. Together, we built the largest and most active DAO ever. We regularly had hundreds of thousands of voting wallets, voted on 20+ proposals, and pioneered concepts like Active Staking Rewards before anyone else. In a time where it’s rare to see DAO proposals get more than 100 voters, we showed it was possible to build governance that massive numbers of people cared about. We likely experimented the most amongst all the major protocols about what it means to be a community, a DAO and a platform - and we most certainly learnt a ton. But there were also problems that only became obvious over time. Specifically: - Mechanics of governance turned some potential holders away from the token - for example, the frequency of voting and the 30 day lockup. - We were spending too much time and energy on public comms around the DAO, reducing the amount of attention on the Jupiter product suite and the overall Jupiter mission - Budgeting votes for Work Groups created a massive divide in the token holder base and drew negative attention to $JUP All these, combined, had one MAJOR disadvantage - attention was consistently drawn away from the great work of the team/community towards things that drew the ire of token holders. Fundamentally, the previous setup was not additive to the $JUP token. To move forward, we need to keep what was good, and change what was not. /// Major Change #1: Scaling Back the DAO After countless conversations with token holders, it’s clear that the Jupiter DAO is an important vehicle. Many $JUP holders believe deeply in the power of community governance, and are excited to be able to share their opinions and shape the future of Jupiter. But these conversations have also made clear that the DAO should be laser-focused on extremely high-leverage actions. The constant flow of votes was a drain on token holder attention, especially when vote subjects felt “small”. The other thing was that the votes, a major major driver of community attention, constantly drawn attention to, and vastly Going forward, the DAO will have a narrower focus on broad tokenomics decisions and major treasury stewardship items. This means no more Work Groups, fewer overall votes, and more focus in our public comms on products and growth. Token Holders can rest assured the conversation about Jupiter will not be dominated by politics, while still being able to effectively drive decision making around key items that affect our collective future. We are also going to be refocusing the community energy away from politics and towards a pro-social core mission - onboarding the world to DeFi - as will be explained in a separate community post by @AlleyCatNY. /// Major Change #2: Reducing the Unstaking Window Initially, we created a 30 day lockup on staked tokens. Given that Active Staking Rewards were high and governance votes were very frequent, this made sense to ensure only those who were longer term aligned with the Jupiter mission would be able to participate. But now, we stand at a critical juncture. The key is not only to find long-term aligned holders, but to create more of them. And, as we’ve heard from many token holders, the unstaking window of 30 days is too long and turns away potential buyers (particularly large-scale institutional buyers). To meet in the middle, we are going to reduce the unstaking period to 7 days without any penalty. This ensures those who are participating in governance are not simply buying/dumping $JUP to cast a vote, while still giving token holders the flexibility they want and need. This change should go live in the coming weeks. /// Major Change #3: Burn the Litterbox (subject to a DAO vote) Finally, to kick off this new chapter of the DAO, we want to start with a critical vote that has been the subject of MANY conversations with token holders: the Litterbox Trust. The Litterbox Trust receives 50% of protocol revenues from Jupiter and uses those revenues to accumulate $JUP from the open market. It currently holds over 121m tokens (~1.7% of the total supply, ~3.8% of circulating supply), and grows every hour. The original plan was to hold a DAO vote after 2 years to decide what to do with the accumulated tokens. But we’ve heard two different critiques. First, some token holders have suggested that holding a large amount of $JUP without clarity on how the tokens will be used is creating uncertainty. By far the most common suggested solution is to “burn” these tokens. Second, some token holders have suggested that the buybacks themselves are not particularly effective. The solutions for this are more varied - some want continuous burns, some want increased investment in product growth, and some want other use cases of the revenue. Deciding what to do with 1) the current $JUP holdings and 2) the ongoing revenues are both massive decisions. They are the perfect example of the types of decisions that the DAO can and should have active input on. Starting today, we’ll hold a period of public discussion on the first question (Burning the Litterbox). This will continue for ~10 days, with a formal vote to Burn the Litterbox’s existing holdings shortly thereafter. After that, we will have a separate conversation about whether the $JUP Accumulation Plan should be continued, or if there are much better uses for the revenue. If you’re a token holder, now is the time to make your opinion known, and to get involved again in meaningful governance! – All three of these changes are concrete and tangible, but I want to also point out a more philosophical change that’s taken place within the team. For a long time, we didn’t give JUP the type of attention we give to our products. Each product has a clear value proposition, a marketing plan, iterative improvement process, etc. And for a long time, JUP didn’t have this. We expected the market to understand the value of JUP based on the strength of our products, community, and vision. That was a mistake. And one that we are already in the process of fixing. Going forward, we’re going to give JUP the attention it deserves. We need to be incredibly vocal about the Jupiter story, about the JUP story, and about the story of DeFi going forward. And we’re going to be having more conversations in public about other long term use cases for JUP that will integrate into the future of Jupiter platforms. So here’s my free advice - if you’re tired of seeing talk of Jupiter, switch to Bluesky 😉
English
418
377
1.7K
468.1K
molu
molu@molusol·
Future of JUP 🚨 - 7-day lock period, not 30 days - Eliminate work groups and reduce DAO votes - Burn the litterbox (50% of revenue) MASSIVE changes
molu tweet media
English
35
45
385
13.3K