๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open)

10.3K posts

๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open) banner
๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open)

๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open)

@Riley_AV

๐Ÿ”ž NO MINORS, NO WHINERS ๐Ÿ”ž I'M ON BSKY!!! https://t.co/sCuSW6ZRTk She/Her | โ™Š ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ’™ links: https://t.co/yJZybGhpw7

Katฤฑlฤฑm Mayฤฑs 2009
440 Takip Edilen10K Takipรงiler
๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open) retweetledi
๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open) retweetledi
skekpen๐Ÿ”ป
skekpen๐Ÿ”ป@skekpenยท
if you make art, you have to aggressively not give a single shit what your audience thinks about you or your art. I know it feels like it should be the opposite, but the more you care about their opinions the worse your art will get and the more they will hate and harass you
King Arthur@Nagato890

Tite Kubo was right

English
17
1.6K
6.7K
102.6K
Doopie๐ŸŒผCOMMISSIONS OPEN
Doopie๐ŸŒผCOMMISSIONS OPEN@DoopieDoodlesยท
Sorry I'm spam tweeting Being off work is boring as fuck but listen If you're ever thinking about making homemade apple sauce I think it's important to tell you all that it's not worth it. It takes so long and so many apples for such little sauce. Just buy it. ๐Ÿ˜” Taking the L.
English
9
1
52
1.1K
๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open) retweetledi
Ryan Hart
Ryan Hart@thisdudelikesAIยท
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.
Ryan Hart tweet media
English
614
9.9K
36.4K
10.1M
๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open) retweetledi
Pop Crave
Pop Crave@PopCraveยท
Gemini season begins today. โ™Š๏ธ
Pop Crave tweet media
English
761
3.8K
17.5K
4.1M
๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open) retweetledi
nairda (๐‘๐„๐€๐ƒ ๐’๐ง๐„)
๐Ÿ‘๐‘๐ƒ ๐€๐๐๐ˆ๐•๐„๐‘๐’๐€๐‘๐˜ we've hit 3 years since the first chapter of Speak no Evil was released! Thank you to everyone whose supported the comic up to this point! If this is you're first time hearing about SnE, go read through the story! speaknoevilcomic.com/chapter-1/
nairda (๐‘๐„๐€๐ƒ ๐’๐ง๐„) tweet media
English
0
5
9
547
๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open) retweetledi
nairda (๐‘๐„๐€๐ƒ ๐’๐ง๐„)
๐“๐‡๐„ ๐…๐Ž๐”๐‘๐“๐„๐„๐๐“๐‡ ๐‚๐‡๐€๐๐“๐„๐‘ ๐Ž๐… ๐’๐๐„๐€๐Š ๐ง๐จ ๐„๐•๐ˆ๐‹ ๐ˆ๐’ ๐๐Ž๐– ๐Ž๐”๐“!!!!!!!!!! AVAILABLE ON DESKTOP AND MOBILE, GO CHECK IT OUT READ: speaknoevilcomic.com/chapter-14 #indie #comics #manga #illustration #oc
nairda (๐‘๐„๐€๐ƒ ๐’๐ง๐„) tweet media
English
0
5
11
712
๐Ÿ’• Riley ๐Ÿ’• (cm open) retweetledi
Pusheen the cat
Pusheen the cat@Pusheenยท
๐Ÿ’Œ ๐ŸŒผ โœจ
Pusheen the cat tweet media
QME
3
470
2.3K
30.7K