The Accomplice

Here is a historical detail we didnt go into depth in the documentary. Did you know the Wahhabis tried to starve to death the residents of Makka? In 1805 Wahhabis launched their first siege of Makka. According to them, the Muslims of Makka were kafir mushriks worse than the mushriks who fought the Prophet ﷺ. To force the Makkans into surrender, the Wahhabis initiated a mass starvation campaign that claimed many lives. This is recorded by the Wahhabis themselves in their histories. Consider the following passage from Ibn Bishr.

How did the Ottoman Empire take care of Makkah and Madīnah? They didn’t.

Cursing the Ṣaḥābah is a common practice in Irān Here is a 13-minute compilation of prominent Rāfiḍī clearings in Irān insulting, cursing and making takfīr of the Ṣaḥābah, as well as public congregations in Irān partaking in such cursing. Daniel Haqiqatjou wants to hide these examples from you in order to run cover for Khameini’s taqīyyah.

2 years of Sunni Palestinians being mass murdered, did you see any of these Wahhabi grifters make a single video about the Talmud, Jewish supremacy, Kabbala, etc.? But when their UAE brothels and Saudi oil fields are in danger, that's when they get serious.

Was Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā an Ottoman proxy? A quick history lesson: Many people have this false idea that Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā’s Egypt was some distinct state separate from the Ottoman Empire. This couldn’t be further from the truth: Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā was an Ottoman client, designated to rule Egypt on behalf of the Ottomans in 1220 AH / 1805 CE after kicking out the British from the port of Alexandria and overpowering the Egyptian Mamlūks. The Ottoman Sulṭāns ordered Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā, over and over again, to fight and bring an end to the First Saudi State: 1) First from Sulṭān Muṣṭafā IV in 1222 AH / 1807 CE 2) Then from Sulṭān Maḥmūd II in 1223 AH / 1808 CE 3) Then from Sulṭān Maḥmūd II in late Muḥarram 1224 AH / March 1809 CE In this 3rd letter, Sulṭān Maḥmūd II proposed a joint effort to end the First Saudi State from Yūsuf Pāshā by way of al-Shām, Sulaymān Pāshā by way of ʿIrāq, and Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā by way of Egypt. This was confirmed by Burckhardt when he said: “All the peoples of the Turkish Empire united to exhaust the Wahhābīs and called for the execution of a campaign resembling the old Crusader expeditions against them.” Nevertheless, Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā remained reluctant to carry out this operation and made excuses each time, citing his preoccupation with the Egyptian Mamlūks. 4) Then in mid-1225 AH / the second half of 1810 CE, Sulṭān Maḥmūd II sent yet another letter ordering Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā to destroy the First Saudi State. Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā eventually gave in to this demand, knowing that his disobedience would result in the Sulṭān removing him from office. Conclusion: Whilst Muḥammad ʿAlī Pāshā had a falling out with his former Ottoman masters a few decades later and rebelled against them, there is no doubt that he was acting on behalf of the Ottoman State both before and during his campaign against the First Saudi State. In fact Sulṭān Maḥmūd II sent constant reinforcements and commendments to Ibrāhīm Pāshā during his operations, evidence for this will be shown in the future inshāʾallāh.

People might not know this: There is not a single instance of the Saudi King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz allying with the British to fight the Ottomans. None. Zero. Nada. King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz’s concerns were with unifying the Arabian Peninsula and resisting two warring factions: - On one side, the British-backed Sharīf Ḥusayn Ibn ʿAlī al-Hāshimī, who ruled the Ḥijāz. - On the other side, the Ottoman-backed ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Ibn Mutaʿib Āl al-Rashīd, who ruled Jabal Shammar. Now King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz hated the Ottomans and didn’t trust them (and for good reason), yet the claim that he allied with the British to fight them holds no weight when examining history.

People like this are delusional about the nature of traditional Wahhabism. Look at the 300 year history of this movement. They have literally never fought against non-Muslims. Rather their primary enemy was the Ottoman Caliiphate, which they allied with the British to destroy (e.g., Treaty of Darin). Long before there was ever a Madkhali... Wahhabis had decided that they were allied with the Saudi state against all the world's Muslims. Long before there was ever a Madkhali... the most "hardcore" Wahhabi scholars (e.g., Ibn Sahman, Abdullah ibn Abd al-Latif) had decided that they preferred to ally with non-Muslims (e.g., Britain, US, Israel) over other Muslims - for they regarded these other Muslims as kafir murtads worse than the Qurayshi mushrikin. O Wahhabis - Don't try to rewrite your history. Your history is betraying the Ummah while hiding behind the words "Tawhid" and "Sunna," just like the dog Ruhayli.

There are few contemporary scholars who are as intellectual and gifted as Sheikh Sultan Al 'Umayri حفظه اللّه