@rahulpatilak @adigitalblogger @NSEIndia Looks like someone from NSE could not face criticism for erroneous data.
Better work on the front end and backend.
English
Rising Wealth
90 posts
Rising Wealth
@Rising_Wealth_
Sunil Kumar ( NISM Research Analyst | NISM Certified - Equity Derivatives) Swing Trader | Investor | Markets | IPOs | Valuation | For Educational Purpose Only
Katılım Aralık 2025
7 Takip Edilen18 Takipçiler
English
Its fixed now @NSEIndia
Hoping (stronger) diligence from India's Market runner.
A Digital Blogger@adigitalblogger
NSE page, that shows Technical Glitches of Brokers, HAS A GLITCH! 👏🫠
English
@SystemTraderIN Not an investment advice but I would like you to have some thoughts on understanding covered calls.
English
₹57 LAKHS GONE. My life savings destroyed in TCS & Infosys 😭💔
From ₹1.72 CRORE → ₹1.15 CRORE in months.
-33% bloodbath.
I kept averaging down like an idiot. Ignored every stop-loss. Thought I was smarter than the market.
Now I’m just crying, can’t sleep, can’t eat. Completely broken.
This is what overconfidence does to you.
Sell everything and accept this nightmare? Or keep holding the bags?
Be brutally honest… I don’t know what to do anymore.
#StockMarketCrash #TCS #Infosys
English
Bajaj Auto Buyback Update 📢
Retail Entitlement Ratio: 27.87%
Buyback Timeline🗓️:
Opens: 1 July 2026
Closes: 7 July 2026
Settlement: 14 July 2026
I'm curious to know how investors participated in this buyback.
Did you follow the 1 Share Strategy? If yes, from how many accounts?
Or did you opt for a larger retail application by buying multiple shares?
Share your approach and experience below.
#BajajAuto #Buyback #StockMarket #RetailInvestors #ShareMarket #RisingWealth
English
A lot of discussion around the Bajaj Auto Buyback is focused on the ₹12,000 buyback price.
Another important factor is the Retail Entitlement Ratio and Acceptance Ratio.
In this updated analysis, I've explored an additional scenario based on the previous buyback data and discussed how it could impact the estimates.
Video:
youtu.be/BpWW6eCcdjo?si…
YouTube
English
Wipro Buyback Update
• Retail Entitlement Ratio: 19.6%
• Earlier estimated Acceptance Ratio: 35-50%
• Revised Expected Acceptance Ratio: 25-30% (may improve if retail participation is lower than expected)
Key Dates:
📌 Tender Opens: 11 June 2026
📌 Tender Closes: 17 June 2026
📌 Expected Settlement: 24 June 2026
The final acceptance ratio will depend on actual retail participation during the tendering period.
#Wipro #Buyback #StockMarket #Investing
English
A lot of investors looking at the Bajaj Auto Buyback are focusing only on the ₹12,000 buyback price.
The more important question is:
What acceptance ratio should you realistically assume?
I ran through the numbers, retail eligibility and different profit scenarios in this video:
youtu.be/Khhs-fgE7Zc
What acceptance ratio are you expecting for the Bajaj Auto buyback?
YouTube
English
After examining the SEBI's stance against Rajesh Exports, it is evident that reporting fake/incorrect data should not be tolerated.
But why @SEBI_updates @SEBI_India is hesitant to take action against NSE for disseminating incorrect face value data for a bond (for 1.5+ Years) on its live trading interfaces, due to which investors suffered losses? What makes @NSEIndia an exception?
This is setting a wrong example where an exchange can get away from such systematic failure without any accountability.
Is this how Sebi is planning to increase retail participation in the corporate bond market?
@Grok What do you think?
#sebi #investorprotection #rajeshexports #nse
English
@SEBI_updates @SEBI_updates @FinMinIndia So even an AI knows better how to handle the investor protection framework but the SEBI officer who dealt with these complaints failed to address the issue properly.
Kindly, train your employees on investor impact of these kinds of issues to make them more competent or ask them to use AI for reference if they are not able to understand the grievance properly.
Rising Wealth@Rising_Wealth_
@grok If you were a SEBI officer reviewing this case, what course of action would you have followed? Provide your unbiased opinion.
English
English
As SEBI officer in this case: Partial correction after complaints, with master page fixed only after Dec 2025 notification, shows weak controls and slow response at NSE.
I'd investigate the full delay, partial fix, and why issuer filings weren't reflected promptly across systems. Mandate automated synchronized updates for outstanding principal on all amortizing bonds. Audit debt segment data. Assess trader impact for redressal. Issue directives for fixes and consider enforcement to protect integrity.
English
@grok If you were a SEBI officer reviewing this case, what course of action would you have followed?
Provide your unbiased opinion.
Rising Wealth@Rising_Wealth_
1/3 Serious display issue in NSE debt segment: Ugro Capital 10.35% NCD Series III (ISIN: INE583D07448, Symbol: 1035UCL26). Listed ~Feb 2024, maturity 27 Feb 2026. Face value ₹1000 with partial redemption of ₹125 every quarter (8 quarters, fully amortizing). Redemption schedule was in offer document & issuer filed intimations with NSE after each payment. Despite this, NSE displayed incorrect Face Value of ₹1000 on its Live Master Bond page and Individual Bond page for nearly 22 months. This caused prices to anchor around the wrong face value. Many investors bought/sold thinking they were trading near full ₹1000 principal, while actual outstanding principal was steadily reducing. Result: mispricing and losses for secondary market participants. 👇🏻
English
@grok What if the NSE corrected the Face value after investor complaints and that too on only live individual bond page and live master bond page still showed Rs 1000 as Face value?
The master bond page face value was later corrected after the investor notified the nse official on 9 Dec 2025?
How would you approach this case?
English
As SEBI officer hypothetically: NSE must maintain accurate outstanding principal data for amortizing bonds like this Ugro Capital NCD. The 22-month display error is unacceptable.
Actions I'd take: Mandate instant fix and investor notification by NSE. Investigate the lapse in processing issuer filings. Evaluate harm to secondary market traders. Push for automated corporate action systems in debt segment. Consider enforcement actions for repeated or negligent failures to uphold data integrity standards.
English
3/3
This is not about the issuer’s credit or bond performance. It’s about market infrastructure & data accuracy responsibilities of a regulated exchange (MII).
Accurate, timely reflection of corporate actions (especially repeated partial redemptions) on live pages is critical for fair secondary market pricing.
@NSEIndia
@SEBI_India
Has anyone else faced similar issues with amortizing/structured NCDs on exchanges?
Important for retail debt investors. Always cross-verify outstanding principal with issuer filings, debenture trustee & actual redemption credits - not just exchange displayed FV.
#NCD #InvestorAwareness #INE583D07448 #SEBI #NSE
English
2/3
Evidence: As late as 12 Nov 2025: ₹1000 shown on both pages.
4 Dec 2025: Individual page corrected to ₹125 after complaints, but Master page still showed ₹1000 (dual face value confusion).
Full correction on Master page only after direct notification to NSE official on 9 Dec 2025.
NSE reportedly handled updates in a “phase-wise manner” based on “market feedback”.
Affected investors filed complaints on SEBI SCORES.
SEBI disposed the complaints (and reviews) citing NSE’s standard disclaimer + initial disclosure in offer document.
Question raised: Can disclaimers fully protect an exchange from prolonged incorrect display of core security attributes on its own trading & information pages, when investors trade directly on the NSE platform?👇🏻
English
1/3
Serious display issue in NSE debt segment: Ugro Capital 10.35% NCD Series III (ISIN: INE583D07448, Symbol: 1035UCL26). Listed ~Feb 2024, maturity 27 Feb 2026. Face value ₹1000 with partial redemption of ₹125 every quarter (8 quarters, fully amortizing).
Redemption schedule was in offer document & issuer filed intimations with NSE after each payment.
Despite this, NSE displayed incorrect Face Value of ₹1000 on its Live Master Bond page and Individual Bond page for nearly 22 months.
This caused prices to anchor around the wrong face value. Many investors bought/sold thinking they were trading near full ₹1000 principal, while actual outstanding principal was steadily reducing.
Result: mispricing and losses for secondary market participants. 👇🏻
English
@NSEIndia What about the bond 1035UCL26 listed on NSE where you displayed Face Value as Rs 1000 on your live pages for 21 months whereas original face value was reduced to Rs 125 and due to which investors suffered losses?
No accountability for such huge failure?
English
Building on the pan-India “Bonds – Ek Sashakt Bandhan” initiative launched by SEBI Chairman Shri Tuhin Kanta Pandey, the first outreach session conducted by NSE on 25th May, 2026 focused on enhancing issuer awareness and advancing the depth of India’s bond market.
The session marked an important step towards strengthening India’s corporate bond ecosystem through meaningful collaboration and sustained issuer engagement.
NSE remains committed to enabling broader access to market-based financing and fostering a resilient, transparent debt market ecosystem.
#NSE #NSEIndia #CorporateBonds #DebtMarkets #FixedIncome #BondsEkSashaktBandhan @ashishchauhan
English
@NSEIndia @ashishchauhan Even regulated exchange like you disseminate incorrect information for months and shows no accountability to investors, any thoughts on that?
English
No exchange means no regulation, no settlement guarantee, and no legal recourse. What feels like a shortcut is a dead end with no exit. Trade only on recognised exchanges.
Verify before you invest.
#NSE #NSEIndia #ScamAwarness #InvestorAwareness @ashishchauhan
English