RoNo542

@Buckeye451973 @buc1080 @AnneKristin0806 @TheRealThelmaJ1 And, if you could read, you would know the case and that he admitted guilt. If you didn't bother reading, STFU and don't make yourself look like a fool giving an ignorant opinion.

Ok I don’t know the case, but if he is guilty of it, then he should be executed. Omfg do you tards have an opinion on anything? Who gives a fuck about a sentencing commission? No one cares. People in power can be corrupt, experts can be corrupt, just like in this and Epstein case. Why do you need to be an expert to have an opinion? Is adultery bad? Do you need to be an expert to know? Decades is fine, so do you vote for people that don’t do that?

This is crazy. 60 days for sexual abuse of a 6-9 year old. Pedophilia has basically become legal of you are a Republican.

@Buckeye451973 @buc1080 @AnneKristin0806 @TheRealThelmaJ1 Insults come from the ignorant. It is your inability to use the English language properly that forced me to answer that way. "What sentence should he receive" is vague. Should could mean what do the sentencing guidelines require. Or, what is my personal opinion. I answered both.

@Silencedestryr @Eusapient @DanteGoody85 @Provokethoughtz Your extreme bias doesn't make my position or my argument.

@RoNo542 @Eusapient @DanteGoody85 @Provokethoughtz Bro, you already argued against your own position without realizing it. 🙈

@Eusapient @DanteGoody85 @Silencedestryr @Provokethoughtz Give evidence that it is a transisitional behavior in humans. Groomers are the people that force children into their religion which occurs FAR more than anyone "grooming" a kid to be gay.

@DanteGoody85 @Silencedestryr @RoNo542 @Provokethoughtz Mostly homosexuality in animals is a temporary transitional behavior in adolescents before they fully mature and find mates. Same in some humans, but that temporary behavior may be taken advantage of by adults and locked in. Hence groomers.

@Buckeye451973 @buc1080 @AnneKristin0806 @TheRealThelmaJ1 I'm not a sentencing commission. But, repeated rape of a child is at least in decades not days. IMO, political whataboutism is worse than denial.

@RoNo542 @buc1080 @AnneKristin0806 @TheRealThelmaJ1 So what sentence should he receive? I never denied the guy.

@Silencedestryr @DanteGoody85 @Eusapient @Provokethoughtz That’s a lazy gotcha.

@RoNo542 @DanteGoody85 @Eusapient @Provokethoughtz I accept your concession

@Justin_4America @katieporterca We should all stop supporting any politicians who act angry such as calling reporters childish names or act so unstable they get nicknamed TACO. Porter and Trump are bad for America. Any decent person would see that.

Who in the world is still supporting @katieporterca she is crazy and has anger issues! She is unstable!

@Justin_4America @TheRealThelmaJ1 @GrayMaynard The difference is, on THIS thread about an R, I would state my disgusted about him going free. If THAT Dem were going free, I’d state my disgust there. Whataboutism while not condemning your own like you just did is morally bankrupt.

@TheRealThelmaJ1 @GrayMaynard I’m sorry have you not seen what is going on in Virginia? Remember Congress voted 300 votes to block congresses Sexual allegations. Let’s also not forget this. Both parties are guilty of it!

@Buckeye451973 @buc1080 @AnneKristin0806 @TheRealThelmaJ1 “You guys?” WTF are you talking about. How can you know what sentence I would want fit a child moleser? I’m an American. I’m a vet. I am not such a POS that I defend child molesters because of a political party. How can you be that pathetic?

@buc1080 @AnneKristin0806 @TheRealThelmaJ1 It’s letting you know that you can’t complain about sentences when you guys love lenient sentances

@dogtowndynasty @AnneKristin0806 @TheRealThelmaJ1 I really hope that she is a bot.

@AnneKristin0806 @TheRealThelmaJ1 Yet you do not condemn what is going on in the Republican party. You only deflect. Partisanism is a disease where not conceding to the other side matters more than real accountability.

@DavidCBismarck @Eusapient @Provokethoughtz The irony is that guy quoting Feynman in his bio. Of course, he isn't using the quote accurately. Feynman would shun experts by using better science and logic. Modern use is by people presenting religiosity and misinformation.

@RoNo542 @Eusapient @Provokethoughtz Hypocritical Bible-thumper types don’t believe in science, so your citation won’t convince them.

@Silencedestryr @DanteGoody85 @Eusapient @Provokethoughtz Thanks. I now know in the future to say "lazy gotcha" instead of explaining so I am not accused of dodging. I'm not sure how sex with men, sex with animals, but not sex with nobody deviates, but that is the what makes the bible an amazing book. It can mean what you want it to!

@RoNo542 Your logic is a dodge. I cited Matt 19:4-6 first to show Jesus reaffirmed the creational design: “male and female… the two shall become one flesh.” That’s the positive standard. Homosexuality deviates from it, same as bestiality or incest. You replied “Jesus did not discuss homosexuality in Matthew 19:4-6.” That’s the exact “silence = permission” fallacy. Jesus wasn’t listing sins—He anchored sexual ethics in Genesis 1-2. He also didn’t mention single hetero males. “Bunch of sinners, I guess”? Lazy gotcha. You treat creational sexual ethics like fulfilled ceremonial rules (shrimp, fabrics). Jesus didn’t. Engage the actual argument instead of evading.

@Eusapient @Provokethoughtz Says the guy making uncited preposterous statements all day long! link.springer.com/article/10.100…

@RoNo542 @Provokethoughtz Cite your reference.

@Silencedestryr @DanteGoody85 @Eusapient @Provokethoughtz You were the one that brought that bible verse in as a "reaffirmation" of the ethics of homosexuality so that far too long post makes no sense from the start. Being a single hetero male isn't mentioned. Bunch of sinners, I guess.

Jesus didn’t discuss bestiality or rape in Matthew 19:4-6 either—does that make them morally acceptable? Of course not. That’s the exact same “silence = permission” fallacy you’re running here. Jesus wasn’t handing out an exhaustive sin checklist in that verse. He was doing something far more foundational: quoting Genesis and locking in the Creator’s positive design for marriage and sexuality—“male and female,” “a man shall… be united to his wife,” “the two shall become one flesh.” That blueprint defines the standard. It excludes homosexuality the same way it excludes every other deviation from God’s creation order. Pretending “He never named it” creates a loophole is just special pleading—apply that logic consistently and half the moral law vanishes. And spare us the shrimp-and-mixed-fabrics false equivalence. Those were ceremonial rules for ancient Israel, fulfilled in Christ. Sexual ethics are pre-Law, creational, and Jesus Himself just reaffirmed them. Different category. Different authority. Your “He didn’t discuss it” dodge collapses the second you test it against the actual text. Engage the argument instead of dodging it.

@OltonMilton @BowieFan2024 @JamesTate121 @grok That doesn't even make sense. You have run out of ideas so you are left with false insults. Given that I brought the term "per capita" to the conversation, you are sounding more congnitively inhibited than your hero. And, you want so badly to pin me, I'm not a leftist.

@RoNo542 @BowieFan2024 @JamesTate121 @grok So suddenly you don't know what per-capita means? How can you bring down the quality of debate, and simultaneously be wrong about the quality of debate being higher?

Kent McKinley is a cancer patient in Oklahoma covered by the state employee health plan. His pharmacy benefit manager, CVS Caremark, charged that plan $120,000 more per year for his cancer drug than a local pharmacist would have charged. Nobody told him. The middlemen kept the money. The system kept running. Then Donald Trump launched TrumpRx — his marquee drug pricing fix. At a Senate Finance Committee hearing on April 22, 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren sat across from RFK Jr. and showed him what TrumpRx actually costs. A 30-day supply of Protonix: $200 on TrumpRx. The same generic at Costco: $16.99. One in four drugs on TrumpRx costs more than alternatives. And Big Pharma? They got 100% tariff relief in exchange for listing their drugs on the site. TrumpRx doesn't eliminate the middleman. It is the middleman. Rebranded. With a presidential logo. Watch: youtu.be/BYCU6rBHEbU

@Silencedestryr @DanteGoody85 @Eusapient @Provokethoughtz Because the other poster has written over and over "is is self-limited by nature." If he had not kept attempting that false point, nobody would even be talking about it. Jesus did not discuss homosexuality in Matthew 19:4-6.

@RoNo542 Calling it a “straw man” doesn’t make it one. I didn’t claim you said “rape & infanticide are good b/c natural.” I took @DanteGoody85’s exact move—homosexuality in hundreds of animal species to challenge “evil” or “why God made them that way”—and applied it consistently. Nature describes; it doesn’t prescribe. Lions kill cubs, ducks rape, chimps cannibalize. That settles nothing about human morality. Classic appeal-to-nature fallacy. You yourself agreed homosexuality (like colorblindness) is “not the normal.” So why invoke animals if they prove neither normality nor ethics for image-bearers? On the shrimp/fabrics meme you pushed: those were Israel’s ceremonial/civil laws (fulfilled in Christ). Sexual ethics are creation order, reaffirmed by Jesus (Matt 19:4-6). Different category entirely. Animal behavior doesn’t license the bad stuff. It doesn’t license this either.

@Eusapient @DanteGoody85 @Provokethoughtz I know that isn't how you objectively look for information. It has extreme bias written all over it.

@RoNo542 @DanteGoody85 @Provokethoughtz No. I'm looking for information. Do you have any?

@Eusapient @Provokethoughtz That isn't true. The genetics of it are not simple and inherited as a single gene. But there it has been shown to have genetic concordance in identical twins than fraternal twins. Thier pairing can and does occur but it is not required for the trait to continue in nature.

@RoNo542 @Provokethoughtz Nobody has demonstrated it's genetic. What is that distinct percentage? Colorblindness is genetic. Homosexuality could be behavioral, maybe some genetic component. Homosexuals do not have children naturally by virtue of their pairing. They require assistance if they want kids.

@Eusapient @DanteGoody85 @Provokethoughtz Are you really trying to use rumors and innuendo with zero objective evidence as a point? Is "we hear stories" something I am supposed to take into consideration?

@DanteGoody85 @RoNo542 @Provokethoughtz Yes. And what constitutes stable? To what extent are authorities skewing placement of foster children and adoption? I honestly don't know, but we hear stories. Some are probably true, but it doesn't mean political manipulations are pervasive.

@Silencedestryr @DanteGoody85 @Eusapient @Provokethoughtz Nice straw man argument. Nobody said any of that silliness. The "it natural argument" was in response to the "it is self-limited in Nature" point which is false.

@DanteGoody85 @Eusapient @RoNo542 @Provokethoughtz Animals also commit infanticide, rape, and cannibalism. Does that make those things ‘natural and okay’ too? We don’t look to lions to decide human morality — we use reason and ethics. So stop using ‘it’s natural’ as an argument. It proves nothing.