Robert B

16K posts

Robert B

Robert B

@Robert21241B

patriot,ARMY Vet-EOD ,God, family, ,USA,1A2A follow patriots 1st, truth, justice, MAGA,MAHA, JESUS saves,NO DMs, ,crypto , zero posts = no follow

detroit area Katılım Mayıs 2023
949 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Robert B retweetledi
🇺🇸 Jingo 🇺🇸
🇺🇸 Jingo 🇺🇸@Jingoman111·
🙏🫡 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 NEVER FORGET! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 🫡🙏
🇺🇸 Jingo 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
27
73
169
1.1K
Robert B retweetledi
Crazy Vibes
Crazy Vibes@CrazyVibes_1·
He was supposed to be on vacation. Spencer Stone, 23, was dozing on a high-speed train hurtling through Belgium at nearly 320 km/h. He was backpacking across Europe with his two best childhood friends—three young men simply looking to see the world before life got complicated. Suddenly, a man emerged from the restroom, a Kalashnikov in his hand. In seconds, the calm of that summer afternoon plunged into the unimaginable. Passengers screamed. People dove under the seats. A French-American man named Mark Moogalian rushed to grab the rifle and was shot in the back. The assailant was armed with a pistol, a box cutter, and 270 rounds of ammunition. The train was locked, speeding along, and the police were nowhere to be seen. 554 people had nowhere to go. Spencer Stone had no weapon. No body armor. No plan. He got up anyway. Without a word to his friends, he started running—at full speed down the center aisle—directly toward an armed assailant who had already shot someone. His friend Alek Skarlatos followed closely behind. Anthony Sadler, a student, joined them. A 62-year-old British businessman, Chris Norman—a complete stranger—also joined them. None of them had to. They all did. Stone reached the assailant first, pinned him in a headlock, and forced him to the ground. The struggle was violent and desperate. The assailant pulled out a box cutter and slashed Stone's face, neck, and hands—giving him a deep gash on his neck and nearly severing his thumb. Blood soaked the aisle floor. Stone didn't let go. For nearly 90 seconds, four ordinary men held a terrorist on the ground as he planned a mass slaughter. They finally subdued him and tied him down with belts and a tie. Then Stone collapsed. Bleeding profusely from his neck wound and fighting to stay conscious, he saw Mark Moogalian lying a few meters away—the man who had been shot while trying to stop the attacker. His wife stood beside him, screaming in terror. Stone crawled to him. With one hand, he pressed down on his own wound to close it; with the other, he worked to save Moogalian. The young pilot managed to keep the wounded man alive—breathing and speaking—until the train made an emergency stop and the rescuers arrived. The surgeons who subsequently treated Stone said his neck wound had been only millimeters from fatal. He had lost a tremendous amount of blood. He had come within inches of not surviving. But he pulled through. When he regained consciousness after his operation, he asked only one question—not about himself, his injuries, or what lay ahead. He asked if anyone else had been hurt. He was told no: no one else had died. Thanks to what he and his friends had accomplished in those 90 seconds, 554 people were able to return home to their families that night. French President François Hollande awarded Stone, Skarlatos, and Sadler the Legion of Honor—France's highest distinction. President Obama received them at the Pentagon. The world applauded their actions. Stone consistently declined all honors. “I only did what anyone would have done,” he kept repeating. But that’s precisely the difference: most people wouldn’t have. When danger strikes, all your instincts tell you to flee in the opposite direction. The rarest thing in the world is to see someone run toward that danger—unarmed—for the safety of strangers they’ve never met. Three friends from Sacramento and a British stranger they’d never spoken to decided—in a spontaneous and unforeseen moment—that the lives of others mattered more than their own safety. That decision saved the lives of everyone on board that train. 554 people were able to get home. Because four ordinary people had chosen, without the slightest hesitation, to do something extraordinary.
Crazy Vibes tweet media
English
362
3K
14.7K
310.2K
Robert B
Robert B@Robert21241B·
More traitorous shenanigans by this, I must say evil one, putting American soldiers lives at risk without a second thought, this is treason !
Farm Girl Carrie 👩‍🌾@FarmGirlCarrie

Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission. Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.” Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not. Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.

English
0
0
0
1
Robert B
Robert B@Robert21241B·
In short , high intelligence without empathy for all people is a dangerous thing
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Elon Musk just admitted the most expensive mistake of his career. It quietly dismantles the entire credentialing mythology. Musk runs rockets. Neural implants. Autonomous fleets. Humanoid robots. The most complex engineering operation on earth. You would assume he selects above all for one thing. Raw intellect. Elon Musk: “I’ve made the mistake of thinking that sometimes it’s just about the brain. I think it actually matters whether somebody has a good heart.” He didn’t learn this from a textbook. He learned it by hiring the sharpest minds on the planet. And watching the ones without character build things that were technically stunning and structurally corrosive. The establishment sold the opposite story for a hundred years. Get the degree. Get the credential. Get the paper. That paper was supposed to prove you were exceptional. It doesn’t. A degree is proof of compliance. It proves you showed up. Met deadlines. Followed a rubric. Sat inside an institution for four years. Never once challenged the structure that held it together. It does not prove you will speak when the room expects silence. It does not prove you care about the thing you are building more than the title you hold while building it. It does not prove you have a spine. Raw intelligence without character is not an advantage. It is a precision instrument aimed at your own foundation. Now extend the lesson. Intelligence itself is being demonetized. An algorithm is about to solve in seconds what takes a PhD an entire career. When cognitive power becomes unlimited and too cheap to meter, the premium on being smart collapses to zero. The establishment spent a century grading you on the exact skill we just taught silicon to do better, faster, and for free. But a machine cannot feel conviction. A model cannot hold a moral line. A server farm cannot refuse to cut a corner out of duty to another human being. When intelligence becomes infinite, character becomes the only scarce resource left. Integrity is not a soft skill anymore. It is the last advantage that cannot be automated. We spent a generation outsourcing our worth to our intelligence. Intelligence is about to become the cheapest thing on earth. Character will become the most expensive. The mind was never the measure of a person. The heart always was.

English
0
0
0
4
Robert B
Robert B@Robert21241B·
The Republicans are not out to destroy people, but only to expose the lies that they left always lean on, thinking if they say it enough, it won't be a lie anymore, but it is a fact that a lie is a lie, it's the lefty Talisman,
Donna OMeara@omeara51547

We’re Not Just Disagreeing Anymore—We’re Destroying Each Other Over Politics Op-ed by Donna O’Meara Something has seriously changed in this country—and you can feel it. There have always been debates when politics are involved. Now it’s deeply personal. Uncomfortably emotional. And more often than people want to admit, it has become hostile and violent. You’ve probably seen it up close. Friendships ending over one conversation. Family members walking on eggshells—or not speaking at all. People getting publicly shamed, blocked, or unfairly criticized just for saying what they think. This isn’t rare anymore. It’s become the new normal. And no—it’s not just “people being more passionate.” There’s something deeper and darker going on. Americans don’t just disagree anymore—they don’t even think the other side lives in reality. According to the Pew Research Center, large majorities of both Republicans and Democrats now say people on the other side can’t even agree on basic facts. That’s not a political gap—that’s a reality gap. And once you lose a shared sense of reality, disagreement stops being a debate. It starts feeling like you’re dealing with someone who is either ignorant, irrational, out to get you or dangerous. Not smarter arguments. Not better reasoning. More hostility. More attacks. More need to “win.” That’s when things escalate. Add personality into the mix and it’s like pouring gasoline onto a fire. Research in psychology—including studies published in journals like Current Psychology and Political Behavior—has found that traits like entitlement, low empathy, and hypersensitivity to criticism (all tied to narcissism) are strongly linked to more aggressive political behavior. Recent studies—and large-scale surveys like the American Family Survey—have uncovered some striking patterns. Certain left-leaning groups, particularly younger folks who spend more time online, report higher levels of emotional distress tied to politics, and a greater willingness to cut people off, shame them, or justify aggressive tactics in the name of being “right.” That doesn’t mean everyone on the left behaves this way. But it does mean the pattern is showing up enough in the data that it can’t just be ignored. Social media is also a powerful accelerant for political division. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that simply exposing people to opposing political views online often increased polarization, rather than reducing it. Think about that. The thing we were told would make us more informed and open-minded… is, in many cases, doing the exact opposite. And it makes sense when you look at how these social media platforms engage viewers. Outrage spreads faster than nuance. Anger gets rewarded. Humiliation goes viral. So people adapt. They get sharper. Meaner. More melodramatic and exhibitionistic, because that’s what gets likes, followers and attention. Roll all of this together and it creates a perfect storm: Disagreement feels like a threat. Threat triggers emotion. Emotion turns into attack. And suddenly, we’re not arguing intellectual ideas—we’re viciously going after each other. That shift in how we interact is doing real harm. People are exhausted. According to Pew, a majority of Americans now say politics leaves them feeling drained. Not engaged. Not informed. Drained. Relationships are failing. More people are cutting ties with friends and loved ones over politics. “Honest conversations” are being avoided. One person attacks another publicly—without even allowing a response. People are ghosting each other just to keep the peace. And in the worst cases, people are facing outright hostility from those they used to trust. If you have been a victim of this aggressive behavior it can leave lasting emotional scars and damage, and you are not alone. It makes you not speak up. It makes you question relationships. And over time, victims have reported feeling isolated, lost, hurt and guilty. So let’s be clear about something that doesn’t get said enough: If someone attacks you personally because of your political views—that says more about them than it does about you. If you’ve been on the receiving end of hateful attacks, bullying, or bashing remember you are not responsible for managing, fixing or controlling other people’s emotional actions or reactions to your core beliefs. Let go and allow others to 100% experience their own anger, discomfort, disbelief or anxiety. It has nothing to do with you. You’re responsible for how you respond. That’s it. And sometimes the smartest response is no response at all. Set boundaries. Step away from toxic conversations. Stop trying to “win” arguments with people who aren’t interested in understanding you. That’s not weakness. That’s control. But there’s also a line you don’t want to cross. Because the same system that’s pushing some people into outrage… will pull you in too if you let it. It’s easy to start seeing the “other side” as crazy, lost, or beyond reason. And sometimes—based on behavior—you might feel justified. But the second you stop seeing people as people, you’re playing the same game that’s breaking everything in the first place. Here’s the bottom line: Disagreement is normal. A free society depends on it. But turning disagreement into personal destruction? That’s a choice. And right now, too many people are making the wrong choice. ~

English
0
0
0
4