@ABC Here we go! ABC misleading everyone again! How about telling everyone that it's NOT a US Military plane instead of titling it to make people think it is!
A military transport plane with 128 people on board, mostly soldiers, crashed shortly after taking off Monday in Puerto Leguizamo, Colombia, killing at least 66 people and leaving dozens injured, the head of Colombia’s armed forces said. abcnews.link/c4CVAOs
@MrPitbull07 What kind of world do we live in where people don't use common sense?!? The woman paid for 2 seats. The woman with the child has absolutely no right to it nor any right to complain about not being able to use it. f you wanted your kid to have a seat then friggin pay for it!!
A flight turned tense after a disagreement between two passengers over an extra seat.
According to the account shared online, a plus-size traveler had intentionally purchased two seats for the flight. She explained that she wanted enough space to sit comfortably and avoid making other passengers uncomfortable during the journey.
But during boarding, the situation quickly changed.
A mother traveling with a toddler approached the woman and asked if the child could use the empty seat next to her. The traveler declined, explaining that she had paid for the seat specifically for extra space.
The conversation escalated.
The mother reportedly complained to a flight attendant, arguing that the seat could be used by her child instead. The passenger then showed both of her boarding passes, proving she had purchased and reserved the extra seat.
In the end, the airline allowed the woman to keep the seat she paid for.
The toddler was expected to sit on the parent’s lap, which is a common arrangement permitted for very young children on flights.
Despite the resolution, the woman later said she felt uncomfortable for the rest of the flight, claiming she received disapproving looks and passive-aggressive comments from other passengers.
When the story spread online, it sparked debate.
Some people argued that since she paid for the seat, she had every right to keep it.
Others believed she should have given it up for the child.
The moment turned into another viral discussion about airline etiquette, personal space, and whether paying for something automatically settles the debate.
🚨BREAKING - MASSIVE NON-NUCLEAR EXPLOSION IN QOM, IRAN JUST NOW
Qom is Iran's clerical capital
Lots of speculation that the USA has used its 30,000lb GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)
which has RARELY been used, and can penetrate 200 feet into the earth.
@Tablesalt13 This is huge. A US-owned oil tanker SafeSea Vishnu has been attacked by Iran off the coast coast of Iraq overnight. Unclear what was used for the attack, a drone, missile or even a drone boat/semi-submersible drone
@xyLagz@akafaceUS Over attention like that would likely cause her injury. This method would allow someone to intercept and separate them in a possibly non-confrontational posture. There's risky the way but this is a better option
This gesture is widely recognized as a discreet way for someone to signal they need help, allowing victims to ask for assistance without drawing attention.
Be on the lookout!
BREAKING: A leaked video is going viral showing Donald Trump partying with his wealthy friends at Mar-a-Lago before dropping bombs and starting an illegal war in Iran.
Whenever Trump couldn’t get any lower as a human being, he finds another basement.
@TheJFreakinC I support the efforts to crack down on illegal immigration, however an ICE officer, just like any other officer, is not above the law. You need a warrant to search private property.
🚨BREAKING: ICE agents tried to tell a building manager that a locked apartment building is not private property, in Minneapolis.
In the video, the building manager asks a very simple question:
Do you have a judicial warrant?
The agent’s response?
“This is not private property.”
Which is a wild thing to say while standing outside a locked residential building you’re trying to get into.
He keeps insisting she’s wrong.
She doesn’t budge.
She finally says, “You aren’t going to get in. I’m not opening the door without a warrant.”
Another agent then asks if she can tell him whether the person on his phone is inside.
She says, “No.”
He then responds, “Can’t tell me that either? Want to keep your criminals in your building?”
And she shuts that down by saying, “I want to keep my residents safe.”
Which is the exact opposite of what ICE was doing.
Because trying to pressure your way into private property, without a judicial warrant, is fishing.
It’s hoping someone doesn’t know their rights.
And do you know what they hope you don’t realize?
If this person was actually some dangerous “worst of the worst” criminal, they love talking about, getting a judge to sign a warrant would be the easiest part of their day.
Instead, they show up with no warrant, no legal authority to enter, and try to lie their way inside.
Because ICE agents are gambling on the idea that regular people will be too scared to say no. And that’s why they continue to use threats and violence, while claiming that anyone with a pending immigration case is a criminal.
This manager saw through that.
Which is exactly why the Constitution only works when someone is willing to demand it be upheld.
No warrant. No entry.
@Rate_the_Refs One is true in that facts dont matter-If you are a Denver Fan or a Patriot hater, then he was short. If you aren't either of these, then he was not short...lol
@GoldenAgeUnfold If the guy is defending illegal activity no matter what it is, then his actions guarding it are also illegal. He is not protecting his home or property from vandals. So if he raises his weapon against a federal agent, he will be justifiably incapacitated.
These are Companies that work with ICE!
1. AT&T
2. Dell
3. Charter Comm
4. Comcast
5. Eco lab
6. UPS
7. Labcorp
8. Palantir
9. Motorola
10. FedEx
11. General Dynamics
12. Core Civic
13. Caci
14. Amazon
15. L3Harris
16. Geo Group
17. Thermo Fisher
18.Lexmark
More