Impressive

3.7K posts

Impressive banner
Impressive

Impressive

@RocketSymbols

Retail Investor 🏴‍☠️ Business Owner 💻 Disgruntled American 🫩 If the truth can kill them, then let them die. - Ayn Rand

Seattle, WA Katılım Ağustos 2023
147 Takip Edilen531 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
Hey Ryan, here's your long hollow piece
Impressive tweet media
Ryan Cohen@ryancohen

The Hollow Men American capitalism is rotting from the head down. We have replaced the "Owner-Operator"—the risk-taker-with a new, parasitic class of corporate bureaucrat: The Risk-Free Insider. By "Insider," I am not referring to a specific title. I am referring to the entire administrative state that has captured the modern corporation. This includes the Directors who exist solely to collect fees, the Executives who exist solely to collect bonuses, and the Managers who exist solely to hire consultants. These are the hollow men of the boardroom. They are masters of PowerPoint. They wear the right suits. They say the right buzzwords about "governance" and "ESG." But they are mercenaries fighting a war with someone else’s ammunition. In a functioning economy, authority is tied to liability. If you make a bad decision, you lose your own money. That fear of loss is the only thing that keeps a business honest. It forces you to cut waste, obsess over the customer, and stay late to fix what is broken. Today, we have severed that link. We have rigged the game so that heads, the Insider wins; tails, the shareholder loses. If the stock goes up, the Insider collects a massive performance bonus. If the stock crashes due to their own incompetence, they are fired with a "Golden Parachute" worth tens of millions. They are gambling with the house’s money, and they never leave the table poorer than they arrived. This looting starts in the boardroom. We have normalized a "Country Club" culture where directors are selected based on social profiling rather than their ability to build a business. The modern board member is often a professional tourist—paid an average of $350,000 a year. Let’s be brutally honest about what that number represents. The average director is paid nearly five times the GDP per capita of the United States. They earn more for attending four quarterly lunches than the vast majority of Americans earn in five years of hard labor. And for what? Most of these directors are "over-boarded," sitting on three or four boards simultaneously. They treat directorships as a gig economy for the elite. They fly in, rubber-stamp a compensation package they didn't read, and fly out. They collect checks from companies they do not understand, do not use, and certainly do not love. They are not there to ask hard questions. They are there to be collegial. They are there to protect the other Insiders. And what happens when these boards hire executives who also have no personal capital at risk? We get the Delegation Economy. When a Risk-Free Insider faces a crisis—bloated expenses, a broken supply chain, or a stale product—they do not roll up their sleeves. They hire a consultant. They pay a strategy firm millions of shareholder dollars to produce a 100-page deck telling them what they already know. This is not management. It is intellectual money laundering. They use shareholder capital to buy an insurance policy for their own careers. If the plan fails, they can blame the consultants. They delegate the work because they are terrified of the responsibility. They would rather preside over a slow, comfortable decline than risk a bold mistake. While American Insiders are busy optimizing their severance packages, our global competitors are optimizing their products. They are not slowed down by bureaucracy. They are not waiting for a slide deck. They are outworking us. If we continue to fill our C-suites with administrators instead of operators, we will lose our edge. We will see iconic American franchises hollowed out by fees, managed for the benefit of the Insiders, while the true owners—the shareholders—are left holding the bag. The time for polite governance is over. If we want to save the American economy from mediocrity, we must demand a return to the "Owner’s Mentality." We need leaders who treat shareholder capital with the same reverence they treat their own savings. The era of the Risk-Free Insider must end.

English
0
0
1
180
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
@bostonvikinguc Yup he looks like he's crashing out, and I've been there.. hope he figures it out and finds his redemption
English
0
0
3
740
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
Spent 10 minutes on the Kevin Gill space before I jumped off and immediately unfollowed him. Honestly I don't care what anyone else thinks, seeing him drunk giving his brother's phone number and his ex girlfriends phone number out to 2000 strangers is beyond moronic. Deuces.
English
7
3
138
9.6K
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
@MrsApeVentures Bro don't ask him about movies ask him what the fck he and his brothers investments are
English
0
0
8
768
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
@SylvesterPatr0n If this guy isn't bashing retail, he's bashing Ryan Cohen. I've been careful to stay away from anything he's got a hand in, and that includes sus ass Lemonis.
English
0
0
1
22
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
@michaeljburry I usually just eat my crayons, but I like what you did with yours.
English
0
0
23
2.4K
TheRealBarkingPuppy
TheRealBarkingPuppy@BarkingPuppy8·
@AdamFrack @Btmflocko @RegiStonk I’m only challenging the chosen few—to do right and turn this world upside down. I’ve walked through Wall Street headquarters and saw a bunch of jackals, but I’m here to help the people who need it. I’m not a scam artist. My soul is full of butterflies. 🦋 hope is everything.
English
81
114
747
17.3K
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
@PhantomBlack699 This still makes the most sense of any outcome. I think the doubt only sneaks in because people don't understand what the hell is taking so long. Hopefully we'll find out some day
English
0
0
4
100
Salvatore Linteum
Salvatore Linteum@PhantomBlack699·
The simplest logic is a structure for understanding this theory. The shell was stripped of it's identity and transformed into a litigation vehicle with NOL value. No name or brand associated with this vehicle. Anyone know an activist investor that might have new brand IP? 🧸
No_Pie_2109@No_Pie_2109

Yeah, we all get impatient at times and sometimes question the due diligence we’ve been doing for years now but never forget this: Since 2023, over 66,000 U.S. businesses have filed for bankruptcy. Only one has renamed its legal entity. Don’t ever get it twisted. It’s not a matter of if it will happen — it’s just a matter of when. $BBBYQ 🦋😉

English
5
18
187
11.9K
RamezJ741
RamezJ741@RJ74120113·
ARE YOU POOR PEOPLE READY ? 78 HOURS OR LESS BABY
GIF
English
45
7
144
9.4K
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
@GunShow_Trader @jason_koj It's just a disagreement in perspective, I'd rather get diluted than watch them take on high interest debt. It's true holders are justifying the dilution, but if we go to $10 next year it'll be accurately justified
English
0
0
0
40
GunShow Trader
GunShow Trader@GunShow_Trader·
@jason_koj @RocketSymbols Stop justifying their actions. It’s amazing how many hoops people jump through and how many lies people tell themselves. Their salary should make them loyal. They get paid well for their work.
English
2
0
0
134
GunShow Trader
GunShow Trader@GunShow_Trader·
$CLOV - So as I read through the form 4s again just now, that may be the total amount of shares being issued per person. I thought that “Acquired” number was 25% of the total shares. I’m still not a fan of it, but it looks like it’s only 1.7 million shares as opposed to 6.8 million shares. The point still stands that we are CONSTANTLY leaking shares and that shit needs to stop. This 1.7 million shares is for exec compensation alone. Give us some kind of share price increase over $10 and I have no problem with that. At $1.73/share, I have a huge problem with that. Especially when they won’t use their own money to buy shares.
GunShow Trader@GunShow_Trader

$CLOV AND Jamie Reynoso gets 600,000. That’s 6.8 million shares added to the float. Did I misunderstand something when executive compensation via shares was supposed to be done after January? They just issued 3 more years worth.

English
5
0
10
2.4K
Impressive
Impressive@RocketSymbols·
@Sandeep01671120 Your post is a bit optimistic, CFOs don't leave when things are going great. Chances are there were internal disagreements. That doesn't mean this is necessarily bad but I assure you that 2 CFOs in 2 years is a negative to neutral sign not a positive one.
English
0
0
1
92
Sandeep Singh, CFA
Sandeep Singh, CFA@Sandeep01671120·
$clov to kill all the fud here of CFO leaving - it’s part of the process in company transition see below Why Now — Especially If Growth Has “Just Started”? This timing actually fits a very common positive pattern for growth-stage tech/healthtech CFOs rather than any red flag: 1. He delivered exactly what he was hired for.. 
Peter joined Clover in April/May 2024 (only ~23–24 months ago) with the explicit mandate to drive profitability, operational efficiency, disciplined capital allocation, and new revenue streams (e.g., Counterpart Health platform licensing). 
Clover has now hit key milestones: Adjusted EBITDA positive, path to GAAP net income in 2026 locked in, 40%+ revenue growth, and massive membership momentum. His quote literally says he “built a strong financial and operating foundation.” The heavy lifting is done. 2. Classic “mission accomplished” executive transition
In companies moving from “survive + grow at all costs” to “scale profitably,” CFOs often rotate out once the financial house is in order. The 2026 guidance being reiterated today signals the board and CEO see zero disruption to the growth story. 3. Better external opportunity
OutSystems is a well-known enterprise tech player at its own scaling inflection point. Moving from a small-cap public healthtech CFO role to another high-growth tech CFO role is a natural step up for a seasoned operator like Kuipers (ex-Omnicell, Quantcast, Weather Company). 4. No signs of internal trouble • Smooth internal interim replacement from the core insurance operations side (continuity in the regulated MA business). • Guidance unchanged. • Explicit “no disagreement” language (companies only say this when they want to kill speculation). • This is Clover’s second CFO in ~2 years, but the first change (2024) was also framed as bringing in the right person for the profitability phase. Bottom line -This is not a “growth is stalling so CFO bails” situation — it’s the opposite. Peter helped get Clover to the profitability runway, the company is publicly confident in 2026, and he’s moving to a new challenge. Markets often view these moves neutrally or even positively when guidance is reaffirmed and the story remains intact.
English
3
0
12
1.5K
Impressive retweetledi
Jdubbs
Jdubbs@Jdubbs00627840·
One year ago in MARCH $CLOV bought back ~5M shares at $3.60 Not hype. Not dilution. Actual conviction Today: ✔ Stronger margins ✔ Cleaner balance sheet ✔ Net GAAP income positive (Q1 2026) The market priced it like it was broken. It wasn’t. It was early
Jdubbs tweet media
English
2
4
21
2.1K
TheRealBarkingPuppy
TheRealBarkingPuppy@BarkingPuppy8·
Double down 🧩 @RobinhoodApp ©️ Saw II | Lionsgate | Fair Use. ©️ Ocean’s 11 | Warner Bros. | Fair Use.
English
347
514
2K
209K