RockyTesla

Elon Musk turned down all shares when he left OpenAI because he believed nonprofits are not meant for self-enrichment. "The reason I founded OpenAI was because I was concerned, based on my conversations with Larry Page, that he was not sufficiently concerned about the dangers of AI. At my birthday party, he, in front of a large group of people, called me a speciesist, for favoring humanity over computers. So after that, I was like, We got to have some counterbalance to Google, because Larry doesn't seem to care if humans make it or not. So I thought, what's the opposite of Google? It would be an open source nonprofit, and that's where the word open, in OpenAI comes from. It means open source. I provided all the money, recruited the key people, and taught them everything I know. I actually even got them to deal with Microsoft. And for all that, I did not seek any financial reward whatsoever. The reason I actually took down the offer for shares is because, I mean, I felt like what are the shares, and why like nonprofits supposed to have shares? Nonprofits are not supposed to be self enrichment, so that's why I turned on the offer of shares." — Elon Musk

Today is the start of a very important day in the AI world... the trial between Elon and Sam/OpenAI begins today in Oakland Federal Court. The jury selection is happening right now in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and opening arguments are expected Tuesday. The civil jury trial is projected to last 2-4 weeks, with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers making the final call. So let me tell you why this fight all came about. 1/ In 2015 Elon co-founded OpenAI with Sam Altman and others as a nonprofit to develop artificial general intelligence safely and openly for the benefit of all humanity... this was supposed to NOT be for profit or for closed corporate control. Elon was a major early funder, contributing around $38-44 million (~60% of early seed funding) plus resources like compute and recruiting. 2/ Then, Elon left the board in 2018 over disagreements for the direction of the company and Microsoft’s growing role of the company. 3/ Later, OpenAI took billions from Microsoft, restructured with a for-profit arm, initially “capped profit,” now more commercial... went closed-source in practice, and exploded in value with ChatGPT. FYI, the current valuation of OpenAI now sits at ~$852 billion and the company recently completed restructuring with a for-profit entity reporting into a nonprofit foundation. Now, with the trial, Elon is saying Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI breached the founding charitable trust and agreement by turning it into a “wealth machine” that prioritizes profits and insiders over the original mission. He claims they deceived him about their plans... This lawsuit was originally filed in November 2024, was withdrawn, and then revived in early 2026. And just this Friday, April 24, Elon voluntarily dropped the fraud claims to “streamline” the case and keep the jury focused on the mission issue... proceeding on breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment. This is what Elon is looking to get back from Sam and OpenAI: a/ substantial damages, with stakes in the $100B+ range, with many reports saying it's in the range of ~$134B and the winnings will be given to the nonprofit/charity arm and will NOT benefit Elon personally b/ possible unwinding/restructuring to restore the original nonprofit mission c/ leadership changes (e.g., getting rid of Altman/Brockman from key roles). On the other side, OpenAI is claiming: a/ Elon knew about and once supported commercialization steps, saying he even explored merging with Tesla or gaining control himself b/ OpenAI calls the suit competitive sabotage from rival Elon's company xAI and says this is driven by jealousy over OpenAI’s success This is SUCH an important trial in the world of AI... people may not fully understand. The reason is bc Elon has repeatedly warned that profit-driven, closed-source AGI is very dangerous. This is his chance to enforce the original “benefit humanity” mission he helped create and walked away from in 2018. A big win will hurt OpenAI’s valuation, upcoming IPO plans, Microsoft partnership, and market dominance/customer perspective of the company... and this will also force real changes in how the world’s leading AI lab operates, influencing the entire AI race and future regulations. For me, Sam Altman straight up CANNOT be trusted with the future of AGI, and this trial proves why Elon was right to fight it. This is the same guy who got fired by his own board in 2023 for not being “consistently candid,” then crawled back in and turned the nonprofit “open for humanity” promise into a closed-source, Microsoft-bankrolled profit machine worth hundreds of billions. Elon was the one who put up the early cash and vision to keep AI safe and beneficial for all of us... not to create a trillion-dollar insider club. If Altman gets away with rewriting the rules after the fact, it sets a dangerous precedent that mission-driven tech is just marketing fluff. I believe Elon isn’t doing this for ego or rivalry... he’s really doing it bc someone has to hold the line before profit-over-people AGI becomes unstoppable. This one’s personal for the man who actually wants to understand the universe instead of just cashing in on it. Humanity needs Elon to win. And that's who I'm rooting for!

중국 공산당이 티벳 승려들 구타하고 끌어내는 희귀영상. 공산당은 전세계 암적인 존재들이며 국가급 테러집단입니다.

아이유가 최고 존엄이 맞는 듯 합니다. 유튜브에서 저에게 두번째 스트라이크를 주는 동시에 또 다른 아이유 영상을 삭제했네요 ㅋㅋ 이제 한번만 더 받으면 제 채널은 삭제됩니다. 두렵냐구요? 아니요 ㅋㅋ 제발 제 채널 삭제해줬으면 좋겠어요 ㅎㅎ 악마들을 죽일 수 있는 너무 좋은 명분이니까요😊

The main difference between Elon Musk and Sam Altman: Elon Musk actually changes the world for the better and saves lives: Tesla accelerates clean energy and has saved thousands of lives on the roads. SpaceX is making humanity multi-planetary. Starlink connects and saves millions in wars and disasters. Neuralink gives hope to the paralyzed. He pays a very heavy personal price for it — endless attacks, lawsuits, media smears, and a broken personal life. Sam Altman? He mostly just takes. His technology (ChatGPT) still struggles to genuinely help people with real problems — hallucinations, lies, and fabrications instead of real answers. He turned OpenAI from “for the benefit of humanity” into a profit machine. And the suspicious death of whistleblower researcher Suchir Balaji, who was highly critical of OpenAI, still raises serious unanswered questions. One builds the future and saves lives. The other takes the money and plays games.

很多人都在问川普身边的华裔女子是谁？此女是白宫记者协会现任主席、CBS News资深白宫记者姜伟嘉（Weijia Jiang）。 我多年前在川普第一任期时候，就介绍过这个人，当时她已经是CBS News资深白宫记者，她提问川普时候，不断地就中国的问题刁难川普，她完全站在中共立场上，发表充当中共代言人的提问。 我那时候就扒过她的背景。此人是福建偷渡的难民子女，1983年生于中国福建厦门，只有2岁时候，随父母乘船偷渡美国成功，其父母分别在西弗吉尼亚州和滨州唐人街开设餐馆，她是在唐人街长大 的。 她赶上了美国对中国改革开放，持友好欢迎态度的本世纪初，和一直延申到奥巴马世代，黑人、亚裔，尤其是华人女性等少数族裔，获得美国在教育、就业等特殊优待的红利时代，所以她上了一所很不错的大学，威廉玛丽学院，获得哲学学士学位，之后又到雪城大学广播新闻专业获得了硕士学位，毕业后嫁了一个电影制片人的白人老公，并加入CBS News，2018年起作为驻守白宫记者至今。 她的人生成就，完全是美国给予，但是她并不感恩美国，而效忠的是她心中的祖国——中国。 2023年6月，她当选为白宫记者协会理事会成员，并自2026年起担任该协会主席，是白宫记者协会首位有色人种女性主席，她曾经多次对川普挖坑提问，跟川普不止一次发生过引人注目的冲突。 即使跟总统有机会坐在一起，也显示出她的粗鲁无礼和缺乏教养，不断用手在川普面前，指手画脚， 但是川普从没有和她计较，在昨晚发生的枪击案之后，川普在白宫召开新闻发布时，仍然给她继续提问的机会。