Roderick

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory I never stated that in the slightest, there is no need to make up a story to feed your ego. What I’d like is someone who understands the specifications of what they are trying to accomplish, provide an evidence based explanation on how they were made.

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory So someone needs to supply you with an exact duplicate, down to the millimeter, before you’ll believe it can be made today. With very little respect, that is asinine.

Isn’t it strange… If our civilization vanished tomorrow, almost everything we built would disappear within less than 20,000 years or so. But some of the things still standing will be monuments we didn’t even build. just think about that

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory I’m not here to teach you what replication means. No you never said each element that makes up a barabar cave has been reproduced. Be honest you don’t even know what it is you need to reproduce. You’re harping about on about art and statues that date the caves when none exist.

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory Do you mean having the entire cave duplicated exactly down to the millimeter? Or, as I’m saying, each element that makes up the cave has been reproduced - the digging of a cave and crafting similar ornamentation all to the same or better quality as is found in the caves??

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory The design and specifications of the barabar caves have never been reproduced. According to you it has in modern Hindu temples, the reality is that’s farcical nonsense you spouted. According to the experts no we can’t reproduce the specification of the caves. Try harder

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory What are you talking about? What hasn’t been reproduced? The digging of the caves themselves? We can’t dig caves to a higher precision? Don’t really think that?

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory You are completely incorrect. You could back it up with actual information but we both know it doesn’t exist. There is zero art or statues at the barabar caves used to date the caves. Facts!!!

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory Yes there is. Both. Your obstinate refusal to examine actual evidence instead of, I presume, watching YouTube videos is, I think, the source of your confusion about what’s really there on the ground.

@BAJRjobs @4gottnHistory It’s not proof of construction of the great pyramid though. Add it to the other bits of data and you still don’t have any evidence for who or how the great pyramid was built. It all fails the scientific method.

@4gottnHistory It is proof OF construction, Not how. Add it to all the other evidence strands, and all that is left is exactly how, not when or by who.

The Papyrus of Merer is not proof of how the pyramid was constructed.

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory 😂 😂 you are full of nonsense. No one has reproduced the works of the barabar caves. Not a single newly constructed Hindu temple can be used as an example of reproduction of the caves. That comment is farcical, I’m embarrassed for you

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory And finally, the “real experts” - practicing stone masons - have reproduced the work. Check out the latest stonework from newly constructed Hindu temples.

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory I’m fully aware of art styles being used as a dating method. It’s just a shame you have no art or statues at the caves from the period of the inscriptions. Your harping on about art when there is absolutely no art used to date the caves. Your ignorance is on display again

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory You need to brush up on your art history. Cultural techniques and artistic styles come and go. Which means they can be used for dating. To the year? Decade? Rarely, but within a century or two? Very often yes.

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory No it’s the inscriptions on some of the caves entrances that date them. There is no art that dates them, the real experts state that with modern or ancient tools we could not achieve the specifications on display in the caves. You haven’t given any facts, just your ignorance.

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory The art tells you who constructed them. The only question at that point is how they did it. The tools they had have been demonstrated as capable of doing that work. With those two facts what else do you need?

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory So the art taught you about the constructions of the caves. I’m not surprised your clueless, that answer is embarrassing

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory It's Mauryan art found throughout the Mauryan empire. Expand your horizons - don't look at things in isolation.

@Gwyn213646 @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 Clear difference in erosion. Hardly looks like it was part of the planning process when building the wall. Be nice of you to reply to some of my questions.

@Roderickrodder @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 You can't see the drum column today that Kalayan et al recorded, it's in the foundations under the floor, so the weathering you are talking about is nonsense, and there's absolutely no evidence of it being a repair, it's just cope...

Remember folks, if an ancient Roman document has survived until today, it is not because later people saw its literary value and chose to keep it alive by making copies, it is because the Romans kept their receipts. 🙃

@Gwyn213646 @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 Use the Baalbek virtual tour, best images for it. The fact it’s there beside heavily eroded megalithic stones and it is barely eroded. Can you show me the evidence of the road they made? Why do you think they abandoned the Roman measurement system for the stones in the wall?

@Roderickrodder @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 Can you please show me the picture you are refering to with the erosion on the column drum in the foundations? And how it differs from the columns that stand there today? And any supporting evidence for it being a repair?

@Gwyn213646 @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 2/2 that it’s a repair. Look at the erosion in the stones around it then the column has very little. I am in no doubt the Romans could make things to support great weight. As I said but you ignored, there is no evidence of the complexity of a road required to move the stones

@Roderickrodder @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 Kalayan et al, he found a discard of a Roman column drum in the foundations underneath the trillathon? How did that get there? Kinda sounds exactly like I'm trying to explain to you....

@Gwyn213646 @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 1/2 So you can’t produce any evidence of your claimed road so you move onto the column drum that the Romans used to repair the wall. Strange a column drum is shoved in beside metallic blocks, the framing of the column drum by archaeology is complete nonsense. Fairly obvious …

@Gwyn213646 @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 2/2 hundred ton plus stones to move a few 800ton stones then give up and leave some of them in the quarry. Where is the evidence of this road being dug to bedrock to sit your megalithic foundation stones on. Where are all the megalithic stones now, where is the road?

@Gwyn213646 @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 If you need me to explain why that diagram is an embarrassment to science you are in serious need to removing your head from your hole. You can build roads that wrap around the earth 100 times, it’s a shame none of those roads could support the 800ton stone.

@Gwyn213646 @DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 1/2 That’s a wall they sit on not a road. It’s the supporting foundation and bedrock that matters. There is no evidence of the Romans building roads with hundred ton megalithic blocks sitting on top of bedrock. Where is the logic in building a megalithic road with hundreds of …

@TheImmortician @Megalithic12000 Why would anyone engage in your work, your I am superior attitude is toxic puke. Perhaps no one gives a fuck what you have to say

My work has been on display for some time, and I await engagement, but it never comes. Here is the link that you wont click, let alone read. academia.edu/125868234/Tele… A tantrum? Over what, because I called your 'hero' a fucking midwit? He is one. I dont care what he has to say, first or last, and that continues to be my point. You want to give him the limelight? That's fine, birds of a feather after all.

This is going to blow your mind. Ben from UnchartedX just released 2 full hours on 1 slab of granite. It sits at Abu Rawash, a hilltop pyramid site 5 miles north of Giza, its face carrying a curved cut no straight blade can produce. Chris King founded Chris King Precision Components and has machined hard materials his entire adult life. The documentary puts him in front of the block, and the words smoking gun follow within minutes. He called it the witness of a spinning cutter. 🔹Cut spans 2 axes 🔹Grooves 0.03 to 0.06 in apart 🔹Snapped edge follows the cut radius 🔹Engineer Chris Dunn calculated a 37.5 ft saw 🔹Quarried at 300 camel loads a day in the late 1800s Flinders Petrie, later called the father of scientific archaeology, examined granite here in 1883 and named jewelled saws as the builders' tools. In the same survey he measured grooves 1/100th of an inch deep and wrote that saw teeth were beyond question. That was 3 years before the first motor car was even patented. Christopher Dunn, Petrie, and King all reached the same verdict, a cutting tool and not grinding. The standing rebuttal is still copper, sand, and patience. 143 years apart, and the verdict never moved. What would it take for mainstream to put a machinist in front of this stone on record? Highly recommend watching Ben's full video. 📷 @UnchartedX1

@DrDavidMiano @ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 @Gwyn213646 You are a puke Miano, that diagram is an embarrassment to science .

@ReeceGocan @JRoastbeef44254 @Gwyn213646 You completely ignored my diagram. Why did I even bother?

@rvrsecrets @Megalithic12000 Sand as the abrasive doesn’t produce cutting lines. Copper tubes also don’t produce spiral grooves. You also have the issue of removing the core.

@Megalithic12000 Petrie proposed jewelled saws in 1883, before experimental archaeology existed. Stocks tested this directly. Copper saws with sand abrasive produce the same groove patterns. Published and reproducible. I'd start with his work.

@pinutos @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory Out come the insults. How much is it you charge again for your information? 😂 😂 😂

@Roderickrodder @farmer_tr @4gottnHistory lol. It’s your claim. I’ve given answers for my claims. As Reid says, you’re just a troll and I’ve given you enough rope for a day.