RoscoeMax

Was feeling a down today but saw my reflection after a walk and remembered I’ve been putting in a lot of hard work on my body and mind and I’m actually seeing the results. Let’s go 2026!!

@Baloney_and @Doomerzoomer She’s definitely a “fixer upper” but with a little elbow grease she could be a solid 6.5

@Doomerzoomer Its good to see women putting on a little weight these days and being comfortable

all a man needs in life is a modest lil medium ugly girl like this

So much fitness advice on this app is trash.

@hlovo_ I shouldn’t laugh but god dammit I’m cracking up 😂 😂

He has to move to a different country 😭😭 Dude got arched 😭

@Chizitere_xyz Men do not care about any of that. You can be a waitress at Waffle House and we wouldn’t care. It’s about how you make us feel. Are you loyal, supportive, understanding, affectionate, respectful, gentle, etc. If so, we’ll try to give you the world.

Men are not "intimidated" by your degree, your corporate job, your tax bracket, or your fierce independence. They genuinely do not care about your resume. What modern women call "intimidation" is actually just a man walking away because your combative energy, constant need to argue, and refusal to yield is completely exhausting. You aren't intimidating; you are just insufferable to come home to.

@LorenaTamayo77 @AngelporrasXx Enjoy that lifestyle. I’ll look forward to your video crying about being lonely in 5 years.

@AngelporrasXx Hombres cobardes que no aceptan que los tiempos cambiaron, y ahora las mujeres de alto valor decidimos decirle SÍ a todas esas oportunidades que rechazamos en el pasado solo para complacer a una sociedad misógina y machista. Pero eso se acabó. Llegó nuestro turno de disfrutar.

Mi esposa tuvo una aventura de meses con alguien del trabajo. Lo descubrí por accidente, no por honestidad. Ayer decidí no perdonarla. Le pedí el divorcio sin negociación. Su familia dice que debería intentarlo, que “todos cometemos errores”. Lo que no dicen es que algunos errores se repiten durante meses con plena conciencia. No voy a reconstruir algo que se rompió con decisiones sostenidas. El amor también tiene dignidad. ¿Soy radical por irme, o soy el único que entiende que no todo se perdona? Prefiero el dolor de empezar de nuevo que la duda constante de quedarme.

@6oss_x And she’s not different. She’s just beautiful, that’s it. She might even be a freak but all woman are, you just have to get that out of the “shy” ones. Bottom line-don’t let beauty trick you into thinking she’s rare, there are beautiful women everywhere. Go find a good one.

Stop trying to fix broken women. Love won't heal her. Money won't change her. The only thing you'll lose is your peace. Protect your energy, not her chaos. But you can ruin your life for trying to fix her.

When I tell the story, I tell the part where I fucked up too that’s the difference between me and you. If you don’t like how I tell the story about what YOU DID TO ME, thats YOUR FAULT.

@SimpPolice911 It’s nice to see men who have self respect.

Bride invited her ex boyfriend to her wedding and this was how her fiancé reacted

@KAHALA123Y Real men don’t quit on the things they value. They’ll keep trying, keep working at it. But once it becomes clear she won’t change and she disrespects them, a good man will leave and never look back. That isn’t quitting. It’s self-respect.

A man doesn’t beg twice. The first time, he sets his pride aside because he genuinely cares. He explains himself. He tries to fix things. But if that moment is ignored, disrespected, or taken for granted… something in him dies. And he becomes a man who takes no shit.

If alcohol is still in your life, all other fitness advice is secondary Quit drinking Everything else gets easier after that

@imfynerthanfyne Agree. Stop with the bullshit. You know where I’m at all day and what I’m doing, so just stop.

ngl constantly being accused of fw somebody else a turn off 😭

@BillAckman @X Agree. Don’t budge. She’s despicable.

I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?

@AfsaRosette Aries

What zodiac sign have you found to be the most emotionally avoidant in relationships?

@obsrvate Apple 🍎 meet tree 🌳

Pooh Shiesty's mom went live revealing the reason her son robbed Gucci Mane and kidnapped him was because he owes Pooh over 25 million from his music while he was locked up and didn't want to pay him or release him from his contract 😳 "I raised a real slime" "My son don't play"

@AfsaRosette I’m there now. Took 6 months to get here but going back or taking them back would feel like a complete betrayal to myself. Even if I do miss the passion we had for each other.

Instead of texting, write down why it didn’t work. Instead of stalking, write what peace now feels like. You’ve got to rewrite the story until going back literally feels like a betrayal to yourself. You don’t miss them, you miss the version you created in your mind.

Going no contact only works when you teach your brain what you deserve. Your brain craves familiarity not love. It clings to what it knows even when it’s toxic. You relapse when you romanticise the good & skip over the hurt. So flip the script, replay the lies, the disrespect.

@mymixtapez You lie

Feds say there’s no hard evidence that Pooh Shiesty or Big30 had a gun or threatened Gucci Mane during the robbery, and no “concrete evidence” was found in Big30’s car or Pooh Shiesty’s homes. 👀

@RoyIsThaTruth Worst take ever. He’s an adult. He chose that lifestyle. Now he can live with the consequences. No excuses.

Everyone calling Pooh Shiesty stupid needs to stop talking and start listening. I’ve been saying this for years. Maybe y’all will finally hear me now. Why are we having these “he’s slow” conversations? Please. Listen. Ask yourself one question. How many things would have to be different in your life to get you to make decisions like that? His father was arrested with him. You know what’s the only thing worse than having no father? Having one that teaches you wrong. That man rented the car. Was in the room. Was part of the plan. This wasn’t Shiesty going rogue. He was trained. Just like the rest of us get trained by the people we love to listen to them. Period. There’s a curse on that 1017 label. Artists keep dying and catching cases. Pooh’s own cousin Scarr was signed to Gucci. When Scarr died, Gucci wanted the chain back from his family. That shows how he is. Ralo even said Gucci told him when he got cut “how much I had to pay the record label back.” But it’s something going on that we just can’t see all of yet. And once again it’s real simple to chalk something off to being stupid and ignore the whole thing underneath because you don’t want to see the truth and lose sleep at night. If you think this wasn’t something bigger that made a man and his daddy and two best friends take it this far to get him out, y’all are the ones that are crazy. What looked stupid to the internet was actually fight or flight. A man trying to escape something he realized was going to kill him or try to cage him forever. He reacted. And that’s literally being a human. When you’re trapped you don’t think about how the exit looks. You just run. And THAT is the difference between the people on here just talking and the people who remember what it was like when they were in their own version of his shoes before. 🫳 🎤

@NotDeadBret For real. Just do you bro, nobody actually cares. A chick isn’t going to ask you, “but, are you natural”.

The I did it without a GLP guys are more annoying than the TRT is cheating natty guys. Great you lost some weight, be quiet and move along.

@allie__voss What’s he do for work? Yeah, I’m sure he’s on welfare and disability and our tax dollars are paying for this slob to eat himself to death.

I think we should be able to institutionalize people before they get to this point

@frogcowgirl Might have some sugar in his tank bc what guy calls cologne “perfume”. Who even tells someone what kind cologne they’re wearing when going out with friends. Shit is weird

this is psychotic