@plantblazer If the plane of the earth were vast, and non-local, the earth would block the stars.
Pretty basic stuff.
Also, I can substantiate. You're sub-50 IQ.
google.com/search?q=can+t…
English
Flatus Earth (Parody Account)
3.4K posts
Flatus Earth (Parody Account)
@RoundEarthGod
The sun is a mass of incandescent gas, a gigantic nuclear furnace; Where Hydrogen’s converted into Hel-i-um at a temperature of millions of degrees.
The sun is far away Katılım Şubat 2023
410 Takip Edilen139 Takipçiler
@RoundEarthGod Ypuve labeled eye levek with images of people looking to the ground.
Stars aren't below the surface you spastic.
If there was someone who saw a star occluded by a mountain, someone else sitting on top that mountain could still see that star.
It's prettyy basic stuff
English
To date, JRR Tolkien has provided a more detailed explanation for his fantasy earth than flat earth has.
Behold! Literally the most detailed map of flat earth in existence.
Feel free to provide your own if you disagree.
English
@plantblazer I can have an eye level, and look at the ground. Nothing violated
Stars aren't below the surface because the bottom paradigm is retarded. There's no vast flat surface.
They would be.... if earth were flat. It's pointing out the ridiculous spasticity of flat earth, yes.
English
@plantblazer The text is at eye level, dip shit.
There is a human depicted. The assumption is anyone with an IQ in the double digits will know that is eye level (altitude of eye).
The goal wasn't to make it retard proof, it was to prove you're a retard and it worked.
GIF
English
@RoundEarthGod Yes, eye level not shown in either image ding dong
Now you've shown a distance to horizon, what is that for a 5 foot observer at the shoreline?
English
@plantblazer Flat earth is retarded, yes.
If I were a flat earther, I would be a retard, yes.
Because a non-local flat plane does not allow a dip angle to celestial objects.
It's a debunk of retard flat earth paradigm. Duh.
google.com/search?q=does+…
English
@RoundEarthGod And your eye level shows someone looking to the ground with stars under the surface. I mean are you retarted?
English
@plantblazer Now do the top image. It's consistent. The text is at eye level
Holy hell you have a sub-50 IQ.
English
@plantblazer Read the label you illiterate.
"Below eye level" text is AT eye level.
The stars are above the dip angle. So that is NOT the eye level.
Holy Hell you have a sub-60 IQ.
English
@RoundEarthGod That you labeled eye level.
No dip angle shown, just an imaginary tangent and someone looking to the ground with stars drawn underneath in extreme cope.
So ypu require a distance to horizon, what is that for a 5 foot observer at the shoreline?
English
@plantblazer Read the label, you illiterate.
"Below eye level".
Where are the stars? Above the dip angle line?
Clearly not eye level.
Holy hell you have a sub-60 IQ.
English
@RoundEarthGod This is your ding dong claim that only you assert
You've also claimed a distance to horizon.
Now what was that for a 5 foot observer at the shoreline?
English
@_free_f0rever_ @plantblazer You made up some stuff in your echo chamber. It's not a deflection, is dismissal of anti-scientific fluff.
The results of observation match the globe model. Saying 'require' seems like begging the question is your go-to methodology.
English
@RoundEarthGod @plantblazer There is no measurement or model accurately depicting our shared physical reality that requires the sphericity of the ground.
The sphericity of the ground is a myth that is invalidated objectively by the physical properties of water, as I mentioned above before your deflection.
English
@plantblazer Where you are looking is not your eye level, idiot.
English
@RoundEarthGod Why would eye level have anything to do with earths shape?
Your image showed eye level looking down, you clown
English
@plantblazer That's the dip angle, you illiterate.
English
@RoundEarthGod You have eye level as looking down in your image you spaz
English
@_free_f0rever_ @plantblazer So you believe a Tolkienology. We knew that.
No, I do not observe a motionless horizontal expanse when measurement enters the chat.
Any efforts to do so end up distorted and un-navigable.
Unless you have something more accurate... the globe is the default observation.
GIF
English
@RoundEarthGod @plantblazer Sure.
We *all* observe, perceive and experience a motionless horizontal expanse.
(Even you)
My “model” is simply the acceptance of this obvious truth and the rejection of impossible sci-fi theories that are a radical deviation from it.
English
@plantblazer No I don't you idiot.
Eye level and dip angle are different.
The dip angle's existence debunks flat earth.
We've been over this.
google.com/search?q=eye+l…
English
@plantblazer I use real definitions.
You make stuff up.
We are not the same.
x.com/i/grok?convers…
English
@plantblazer I use real definitions.
You make them up.
We are not the same.
You can neither substantiate nor cite sources.
x.com/i/grok?convers…
English
@RoundEarthGod Show us you don't know what eye level means on repeat 🤣
English
@_free_f0rever_ @plantblazer I am so convinced by your argument I'd love to see your model for consideration.
I'll donate 100 of any sensible model you provide to a local school.
Please provide it.
English
@RoundEarthGod @plantblazer Sorry, but your Ad hom deflection doesn’t hold water.
Just like your model.
English
@IfbShxwn @PBJ4Supper @TheGlobeIsDead You're not actually curious. You'll just run back to the ficitonal flat earth tolkienology.
But knock yourself out.
x.com/i/grok?convers…
English
English
